What's new

Congress turns against Pakistan

In fact I will make this easy for you.

Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over | World news | guardian.co.uk

They were ready to hand him over if they provided evidence.

And Bush's answer:
This senseless decision has what lead the region to where it is, not the deluded crap that is vomitted by some bharatis every now and then.
oh, That was AFTER taliban kept refuising to hand over OBL. When the war started, Taliban wanted to hand OBL over TO A THIRD COUNTRY!! They kept saying that to save themselves from the bombardment! Who do they think they are? All those years from late 1990s when US kept asking for Taliban to hand over OBL, they refused and then suddenly they want co-operation. US rightly said - go fvck yourselves. Even your ISI DG at that time was a sympathizer of Taliban.

The WoT would have averted if Pakistan had some sense, but washing its hands off Afghanistan. Its lofty ambitions, its policy of strategic depth, its India-centric short sighted vision and its pining for Kashmir are some of the few reasons for WoT.

And you nitpick one incidence to show how "sincere" taliban was? Again bull shyte and you sir are full of it by sympathizing with those tali tubbies.

Like I said, you just keep harping one single incidence without even knowing the depth of the matter. Thats why I said, your posts and knowledge is full of BS. "Willful denial".

Like toxicpus rightly put it, the blowback was inevitable. Keep blaming others for your own incompetence and mistakes.
 
. .
Unfortunately, it matters very little what the Congress thinks.

Ultimately, Congress writes the check since Congress approves the budget.

Off-topic, I am actually enjoying the predictable dance of all these Indians jumping for joy and living vicariously through American might. Whenever there is negative news about Pakistan, the usual suspects show up with their sermonizing and chest thumping.
 
.
Ultimately, Congress writes the check since Congress approves the budget.

Off-topic, I am actually enjoying the predictable dance of all these Indians jumping for joy and living vicariously through American might. Whenever there is negative news about Pakistan, the usual suspects show up with their sermonizing and chest thumping.

Talk about it the day it is any different for the Pakistani members on this forum .
 
.
oh, That was AFTER taliban kept refuising to hand over OBL. When the war started, Taliban wanted to hand OBL over TO A THIRD COUNTRY!! They kept saying that to save themselves from the bombardment! Who do they think they are? All those years from late 1990s when US kept asking for Taliban to hand over OBL, they refused and then suddenly they want co-operation.

The Taliban demanded proof of OBL's complicity in 9/11 before extraditing him. The US declined because they did not have proof at the time. The Taliban were in compliance with international norms; the US was not.

The rest of your rant is not worthy of a response.

They are both terrorists!

That wasn't his point. Not that it will stop Indians from grandstanding.
 
.
They are both terrorists!

dumbnut....you are in a thread which is at the moment discussing the role of taliban in harboring OBL who is a alqaeda leader.....so put you mind into it and by the way....you english needs improvement.....i asked the difference not the similarities!!
 
.
The Taliban demanded proof of OBL's complicity in 9/11 before extraditing him. The US declined because they did not have proof at the time. The Taliban were in compliance with international norms; the US was not.

The rest of your rant is not worthy of a response.



That wasn't his point. Not that it will stop Indians from grandstanding.

well said...the indians will just want to make their point across and not the matter in hand..
 
.
In a nutshell: The WoT wouldn't have happened had there been no Taliban in Afghanistan. There wouldn't have been any Taliban in Afghanistan, if Pakistan hadn't installed them in pursuit of a bizarre policy of 'strategic depth'. There wouldn't have been any Taliban itself, if Pakistan hadn't willingly fought an Amrican war in Afghanistan, all in the name of Kashmir.

WoT is just the manifestation of the flawed policy of using terrorism as tool of foreign policy. That cross is for you to bear and thats exactly what you are doing. The blowback was inevitable. 9/11 just expidited it.

Nah, I'll make it even shorter. The WoT wouldn't have happened had the US provided evidence that OBL is behind 9/11.

Your explanation is really bizarre. Seems like you and bharatis are now desperately trying to find even as ambiguous links that Pakistan can have to 9/11 as possible, and by those links then claim Pakistan is responsible for everything happening in the region. Sort of like one of 9/11 jihadist drinking Pakistani tea and then bharatis using that as a link.

Now here's a newsflash for you. Taliban didn't carry out the attacks. Al Qaeda did. Yes, AQ was in Afghanistan, but that is negated by the fact that AQ was ready to hand over OBL.

Secondly, you want to talk about Pakistan creating Taliban. Perhaps, selectively, you forget the role of US in doing so. But even that is not important considering whole thing could have been avoided had Bush not made a senseless decision.

So in a nutshell: The WoT wouldn't have happened had Bush not made a senseless decision and provide evidence to Taliban.



Gubbi - I will get back to you in the evening. Seems like more delusions from you, I am afraid.
 
.
Nahh, i'll make it EVEN simpler, especially for the troll brigages:

one could argue that the WoT, al qaeda, taleban et. al wouldnt even exist had the soviets not decided to go into Afghanistan in the first place!


as for Pakistan ''installing'' taleban in Afghanistan --that is baseless propaganda and far from reality. History has taught us that nothing can be ''imposed'' or ''installed'' in Afghanistan without the backing and consent of the people of Afghanistan. Those who believe otherwise are living in a fantasy world and have little to perhaps no knowledge about the history of the country.
 
.
A point was made as was a counterpoint. And also remember that so-called ''US aid’’ in terms of Pakistan’s GDP is a barely even a percentage. If you want to have a debate, then learn the facts first. Don’t dive into the deep end when you don’t even know how to swim.

Pakistan remains dependent on the IMF and international assistance (US AID + Friends of Pak group) to keep the country solvent.....Do you think Pakistan has any pull whatsoever in the IMF?
Was it not the US that had to bail your country out by prodding the IMF to approve the much needed loan that would otherwise have led to a collapse of your economy/bankruptcy? The US aid only helps...
I suppose in your mind...thats not aid.....but hey we knew a lot of your kind was delusional to begin with...

I don’t know, but at the same time it’s just shrug-worthy and can be flicked away casually like a spent Dunhill, since more often than not it’s hard to take anything indian says……sorry, but this is simply how a lot of us feel --at least its how I feel. I may be alone in this, I may not be.

Fair enough....and you're free to think so....considering the animosity Indians and Pakistanis exhibit on this forum...

The only point I was making was that stop looking for conspiracies in every nook and corner....Maybe sometimes Indians state facts to debate...not mock you...
So going by your logic....should we just disregard any POV of a Pakistani on Indian issues as biased and an attempt to mock?
From where Im sitting....Paranoia is the only word that comes to mind...


May I also remind you that our economy has suffered several hundred billion $ in damage when we joined the GWOT and when '' hit the fan’’ circa 2008/09 and even to date, to some extent. The aid is mere peanuts when compared to the forgone economic opportunity & losses incurred which otherwise would have been realized gains ---free of ''aid’’

For starters....This is your war now....So start treating it like one....

Your economy has obviously suffered due to WOT....but you're not the only one....India has faced insurgencies in Punjab, Kashmir, NE and Maoists for over 3 decades now....We have also gone through terrorist attacks, bombings etc etc....Yet we have managed to come out of it and back to the top....and no doubt Pak will do the same...

But whats sad is that your army and politicians use the excuse of WOT as a crutch to disregard the glaring problems that face your country....
Lack of financial reforms, the promotion of fundamentalist mentality in your madrasas, lack of education all contribute more to your economic problems and prevent FDI than just the instance of an ongoing insurgency...
But all we hear from your side is that its America's war that Pakistan is suffering for economically....

I think unless this mentality changes and reforms are made accross the board.....you cant just isolate the WOT as the cause for your economic woes....

India is a large country with a healthy GDP growth rate. It’s done well economically, though the growth has been uneven and unequal –which is often the case in developing countries. I think Hindustan would be best served addressing its widespread poverty and social problems before becoming a so-called ‘’donor’’ –though that isn’t my problem and none of my concern since Indian citizens are not my concern or priority.

You mentioned India as an aid recipient in the same line as Pakistan....I presented you with facts about what seperates us....

And India's problem is more with corruption than with programs to alleviate poverty and social issues....though thats not of concern for you....

For you, as Pakistan....you're facing an India that is exhorbitantly richer than you are in every field (as a nation)....Comparing yourself to the poor of India and finding solace in this equation is just selling yourself short...

And while we are all giving free funds advice....Pakistan would be much better served by concentrating on its economy, lack of education, social reforms, moving away from Islamic fundamentalism and reinging in your army/intelligence from supporting extremists than to compete with an India militarily....which at least in this decade is a lost cause for you..


nonsense, in my mind, is anti-Pakistan hysteria in hindustan…in your media and among your politicians who know politics real well by feeding lies to the public. A country where even pigeons get arrested for alleged ISI-links. That, to me, is true nonsense.

Do you really want to tread the line of your "politicians and leaders feeding lies to the public" when your own institutions (read army) have been selling the soveriegnty of your nation for a dime (since you dont consider it significant)?

Ill let you ponder over this before you decide to swim in that pool of your own piss...


It isn’t what I prefer. I'm a nationalist. I want what's best for my country. I only care about the well-being and interests of Pakistan. And I will work towards them.

Arent we all?

Rather than what I prefer, it’s merely just pointing fingers at your own loopholes, utter failures and embarrassments which you tried to use to wage psy-ops on Pakistan. In hindisight, it was a miserably failed strategy. You'd be better served in solving the social problems and outstanding issues which lead to terrorism in hindustan --majority of which is domestic homegrown terrorism (e.g. in your restive northeast)

So Im assuming that you're one of those that believes that 26/11 was the hand of Amar Singh and not Ajmal Kasab....

Besides...when was it that terrorism (against civilians) was a tool used by the NE insurgents? Care to elaborate?
As far as we know...civilian terrorism has been the forte of our neighbors and their lap dogs in Kashmir...

It’s invite only.

Bring something worthy to the mohagany table then talk.

Unfortunately it seems like the party comes to your table uninvited mostly....and rarely do they give a sh!t about your invitation or the "nalla" mahogany table....

I pray to god those party crashers stop intruding in your home as they have been doing for the past decade....
 
.
The Taliban demanded proof of OBL's complicity in 9/11 before extraditing him. The US declined because they did not have proof at the time. The Taliban were in compliance with international norms; the US was not.
Again BS. There was evidence linking OBL to Kenya and Tanzania embassy bombings of 1998. OBL was also implicated in USS Cole bombing in Yemen. These events occurred way back before 9/11. You also seem to have forgotten that Clinton had ordered cruise missile attacks on camps in Afghanistan in 1998. One of those missiles failed to detonate and ended up in Pakistani hands, evolving into the Babur cruise missile, you guys so happily flaunt. Seems that you people have limited memory. Is it the water?
Taliban was harboring a noted terrorist. Taliban was NOT recognized by any governments except for that of Pakistan. So pray, how dare you say that Taliban was following "international norms"? International norms apply only to legitimate governments, not the basterd ones.

The WoT wouldn't have happened had the US provided evidence that OBL is behind 9/11.

Your explanation is really bizarre. Seems like you and bharatis are now desperately trying to find even as ambiguous links that Pakistan can have to 9/11 as possible, and by those links then claim Pakistan is responsible for everything happening in the region. Sort of like one of 9/11 jihadist drinking Pakistani tea and then bharatis using that as a link.

Now here's a newsflash for you. Taliban didn't carry out the attacks. Al Qaeda did. Yes, AQ was in Afghanistan, but that is negated by the fact that AQ was ready to hand over OBL.
Oh so all those militants running amock in Af=Pak region were not a threat to anyone? OBL's involvement and execution of 1998 embassy bombings were nothing? All that evidence so painstakingly gathered was flimsy? And the why would US target one lone individual without any reason?
Like Pakistan's initial reaction, Taliban refused to accept US's evidence against OBL. That is why Clinton had to attack Taliban's Afghanistan in 1998. Go check that cruise missile attack again.
WoT was only a matter of time. ISI thought that they could get away with all this BS. Guess what Karma is a very beautiful sunny beach!!
Secondly, you want to talk about Pakistan creating Taliban. Perhaps, selectively, you forget the role of US in doing so. But even that is not important considering whole thing could have been avoided had Bush not made a senseless decision.
So in a nutshell: The WoT wouldn't have happened had Bush not made a senseless decision and provide evidence to Taliban.
Taliban was NOT a legitimate government. No one recognized taliban government. Why should Bush or any other nation give in to their demands? Oh, btw, US had NO role whatsoever in creating Taliban. It is 'hole' and soul Pakistan's illegitimate baby. Ask you knowledgeable peers and you will know. Everyone had evidence of OBL's involvement in terrorist attacks. And yet taliban refused to hand him over. And Pakistan was the only one who recognized and supported taliban. Game over.
Gubbi - I will get back to you in the evening. Seems like more delusions from you, I am afraid.
You guys are the ones who are living in denial, wishing for bad time to go away. Aint happening anytime soon.
 
.
So now that gubbi has been proven to wrong and in fact is the one deluded, one would at least expect him to have at least some degree of shame and not embarras himself further. But no, it continues. I guess I was right -- 10 years and delusion, and it ain't ending anytime soon. True qualities of a loser.

oh, That was AFTER taliban kept refuising to hand over OBL.

That's irrelevant. What happens was if they were ready to hand over him at any stage.
When the war started, Taliban wanted to hand OBL over TO A THIRD COUNTRY!!

Doesn't matter if it's a third country. Third country probably would've handed him over to the US.

They kept saying that to save themselves from the bombardment! Who do they think they are?

Doesn't matter if they were doing it to saying it to save themselves from bombardment. US should've first gave them the evidence then talk. Now it's pointless. Looks like the vomit from you will continue till eternity.

All those years from late 1990s when US kept asking for Taliban to hand over OBL, they refused and then suddenly they want co-operation. US rightly said - go fvck yourselves. Even your ISI DG at that time was a sympathizer of Taliban.

Taliban agreed Bin Laden handover | World news | The Guardian

Well, it seems the delusion wasn't even for 10 years, maybe even longer. May I ask you -- how old are you? It seems you have absolutely no shame after being proven wrong again and again, and your delusions and vomit being dissected again and again.

Here's what matters: Taliban agreed to hand him over. That could've stopped the war right there. But actually you wanted it to continue as it was in your interests, and that's why you've deluded yourself into believing it was the right thing to do.

The WoT would have averted if Pakistan had some sense, but washing its hands off Afghanistan. Its lofty ambitions, its policy of strategic depth, its India-centric short sighted vision and its pining for Kashmir are some of the few reasons for WoT.

No, the WoT could've been averted if US provided Taliban evidence. Quit the lies, quit the rhetoric, quit the circumstantial arguments.

And you nitpick one incidence to show how "sincere" taliban was? Again bull shyte and you sir are full of it by sympathizing with those tali tubbies.

I am merely proving your diatribe and vomit wrong about it completely being Pakistan's fault for where the region is.

Like I said, you just keep harping one single incidence without even knowing the depth of the matter. Thats why I said, your posts and knowledge is full of BS. "Willful denial".

Like toxicpus rightly put it, the blowback was inevitable. Keep blaming others for your own incompetence and mistakes.

You know, this is laughable. Incredibly laughable. As I said, at least you would've had some shame after being proven wrong again and again and humiliated. But it continues. Pot calling kettle black. Goodness gracious. .True qualities of a loser.
I am blaming others for what happened BASED ON FACTS. Not based on rhetoric and fact twisting to serve one's own worldview.
 
.
as for Pakistan ''installing'' taleban in Afghanistan --that is baseless propaganda and far from reality.

"Whether ISI officials helped create the Taliban or simply enlisted them as allies after the movement had already become influential, Pakistani support for the Taliban was crucial." - Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military by Husain Haqqani (now Pakistan's ambassador to the U.S.)
 
.
Again BS. There was evidence linking OBL to Kenya and Tanzania embassy bombings of 1998. OBL was also implicated in USS Cole bombing in Yemen. These events occurred way back before 9/11. You also seem to have forgotten that Clinton had ordered cruise missile attacks on camps in Afghanistan in 1998. One of those missiles failed to detonate and ended up in Pakistani hands, evolving into the Babur cruise missile, you guys so happily flaunt. Seems that you people have limited memory. Is it the water?
Taliban was harboring a noted terrorist. Taliban was NOT recognized by any governments except for that of Pakistan. So pray, how dare you say that Taliban was following "international norms"? International norms apply only to legitimate governments, not the basterd ones.

Firstly, Taliban was not just recognized by Pakistan. Seems like the delusions and denials have no end.

Second, it doesn't matter whether Taliban was an illegitimate government, since WoT was not started due to that.

Oh so all those militants running amock in Af=Pak region were not a threat to anyone? OBL's involvement and execution of 1998 embassy bombings were nothing? All that evidence so painstakingly gathered was flimsy? And the why would US target one lone individual without any reason?

Taliban wasn't a threat to anyone, no.

And for the 100th time, Taliban was ready to hand over OBL. So this whole thing about the militants being threat is largely oversimplified BS.

Why would US target him without reason? Well that statement right there tells me a lot about you. That you facts are irrelevant to you and circumstantial arguments such as that rule the roost. Does Saddam Hussein ring a bell? WMDs? It doesn't matter if they have reason, as long as they provide evidence. This is like me saying why would Pakistan accuse bharat without reason? Seems like logic and facts are alien to you.

Like Pakistan's initial reaction, Taliban refused to accept US's evidence against OBL. That is why Clinton had to attack Taliban's Afghanistan in 1998. Go check that cruise missile attack again.

I just proved you wrong in the previous post. Besides, whether they refused the evidence in 1998 is irrelevant as far as 9/11 was concerned. If they would've refused evidence at that point would you have a point.

WoT was only a matter of time. ISI thought that they could get away with all this BS. Guess what Karma is a very beautiful sunny beach!!

Ah well, seems like delusions will continue. You want to think about Karma, you could also talk about 9/11, 26/11, Kashmir militancy, etc. Stick to the topic. What BS did ISI thought it would get away with? Supporting AL Qaeda? But, oh wait, that never happened. Deluded retard.

Taliban was NOT a legitimate government. No one recognized taliban government. Why should Bush or any other nation give in to their demands?

It doesn't matter, again, because that's not why WoT was started. Look at Bush's own words. Nothing mention along the lines of what you're saying. They simple refused to provide any evidence.

Oh, btw, US had NO role whatsoever in creating Taliban.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

My word, you're calling me delusional. I am not even gonna bother saying anything about this.

It is 'hole' and soul Pakistan's illegitimate baby. Ask you knowledgeable peers and you will know.

Ask your knowledgeable peers and you'll know.

Everyone had evidence of OBL's involvement in terrorist attacks. And yet taliban refused to hand him over. And Pakistan was the only one who recognized and supported taliban. Game over.

No they didn't, you moron. They didn't provide the evidence to Taliban. That's what matters. You can present evidence in the media BUT YOU STILL NEED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO TALIBAN. You remember what happened after 26/11?

And as for Pakistan being only one who recognized Taliban, all I say to that is :rofl::rofl::rofl:

You guys are the ones who are living in denial, wishing for bad time to go away. Aint happening anytime soon.

My word. Not sure when was the last time I saw such a deluded and retarded bharati. And the funny thing is that you have the audacity to call others such words.
 
.
"Whether ISI officials helped create the Taliban or simply enlisted them as allies after the movement had already become influential, Pakistani support for the Taliban was crucial." - Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military by Husain Haqqani (now Pakistan's ambassador to the U.S.)

You could argue that, but he's arguing against the claim that Pakistan created Taliban, which is of course a lie.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom