SledgeHammer
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 491
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
It's kind of funny to read that, when we know how much the weight difference between the T90 and the Arjun is and he probably will lose in most performance comparisons too, which is why he should focus more on development and delivery, rather than on barking around in front of the media.
Russian tank designs with 3-men crew and an auto-loader is smaller in size, Western tank designs with 4-men crew (4th guy is the loader) is bigger to fit four persons, hence heavier. Besides western tank designs (including Arjun) rely on heavier armour, a manual loading design itself is safer than auto-loaders, and won't malfunction also. Surprisingly, Arjun falls in the weight category of 4-men crew western tanks.
So what IA was thinking when they specifically asked for a 4-men crew tank with heavier arnour based on western design?
The only known problem with Arjun 2 tank is its size which cannot let it move easily on trains so let it be along front line with pakistan where u dont need to move much often.
How can size be an issue now when army asked for a bigger 4-men crew tank in the first place?
Last edited: