TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
India's open stance on refusing Rohingya to settle in India, Indian PMs acknowledgement with Mayanmars policy of targeting 'illegal Banglali' terrorists. Indias current Government will never want to become guardian of peace when it is itself trying to brutally surpress control over the Muslim majority state of Jammu & Kashmir. It can only agree upon Mayanmars policy and inheindsight will most likely refuse to support BD in any conflict with Matanmar. Likewise China has zero interest to indulge itself in another confrontation within its region especially with the situation it faces between US North Korea standoff, Japan and Phillipines becoming more assertive with China's islands grab campaign. China will therefore leave Mayanmar to fight with BD, if it came to it. OIC nations are indulged in their own various conflicts between the proxy wars of Saudi Arabia & Iran, they have very little interest in Bangladesh.
India just cant afford to go against BD, too much business interest, Modi or no Modi. We have too many people surrounding BD border will be supporting BD including Mamata didi. Modi has little say there. Assamese and bodos are not counted as any force.
China will try its level best to calm the situation down. Their biggest fear is USA siding with BD. As long as BD goes alone China wont mind and let BD settle north Rakhine.
At the end of the day, its Rohingya who are willing to die for their cause. They just need little help.
BD does not have any recent warfare experience. The only people dying are the innocent Rohingya and Mayanmar is openly getting away with it. BD isn't able to do anything and neither will if Mayanmar launches a campaign against BD.
Who else has? China? They last fought in Korean war right?
BD never had a naval warfare experience but see how we handled 2008 naval standoff with MM.