Clinton Warns Pakistan of "severe consequences."

[SinoIndusFriendship]

MacArthur also said that China would never foolishly attack the US Army, "home by christmas", blah blah blah and his general ended up dead, north korea was saved and south korea lost enough civilians and infrastructure to hold back their economic development for 20 years.

If the US occupied Pakistan, then Tibet and Xinjiang are both in danger, just like how our Northeast and Beijing itself was in danger if US occupied north korea, and how Guangdong was in danger if US occupied Vietnam.

For a small battle skirmish between (weak) Indian forces against (valiant) Pakistani Army, China doesn't need to get involved.

But against a (strong) USA Army-Navy-Airforce waging a full-scale war against Pakistan (like it did on Korea and Vietnam) then Rest Assured China will come to the rescue!

 

[waraich66]

Khasani bili khamba nauchay

 

[kidwaibhai]

No Body is invading Pakistan. What the article is talking about is more trainers on the ground so that they can speed up the training of the Army and FC thats it. The article specifically states that Pakistan will never allow any use personal to take a combat role during operations anywhere in the country.

 

[Kompromat]

We can cut their supply line and let them ask russians to give them a route.

 

[graphican]

That will prove a blessing for Paksitan. The temperature that stays between 80-90 degrees will eventually reach 100 and this nation needs more than anything.

As iqbal said "Khuda tujhe kisi tufan se aashna kar day"

 

[Paksindhi]

LET'S CUT THERE FEET'S, SO THERE WILL BE NO QUESTION OF BOOT'S.

 

[Kinetic]

For a small battle skirmish between (weak) Indian forces against (valiant) Pakistani Army, China doesn't need to get involved.

Do you need some history lesson here? Why making fun? lol Why post off topic troll?

But against a (strong) USA Army-Navy-Airforce waging a full-scale war against Pakistan (like it did on Korea and Vietnam) then Rest Assured China will come to the rescue!

Pakistan fought many wars previous, in how many wars China came to your rescue?

China doesn't have capabilities to face US Pacific command. Learn about both's capabilities.

 

[karan.1970]

All the rhetoric aside, America doesn't have many friends in this part of the world except perhaps India which is ever ready to prove it's loyalties, but in the Afghan scenario, it's of little value since India and Afghanistan don't share any common border.
In such a difficult situation, the last thing the Americans could afford is to alienate it's ally for WOT. As an Indian National, you more than any one else should have the knowledge of how the leaders resort to chest thumping triads for home consumption. By making such a statement, i would say the lady has killed two birds with a stone.

I think Pakistan in the past overestimated the permanence of its value to USA (during USSR era in Afghanistan) and is making the same mistake again. Once US is out of Afg, there is really no value that Pakistan will hold for USA from a WOT perspective. See Iraq now..

About chest thumping, I guess thats something common to the whole subcontinent with the talks of Islamic bomb and so on..
One should just hope that one never has to find out how serious the lady is while making this statement. Being wrong on this one may not be very pleasent for Pakistan

 

[karan.1970]

Its funny to see that how USA and HC had become so nice after the US Pak strategic meet and every one here couldnt get enough of her pictures of giggling with Q and so on.. And now, she is a frustrated old lady, dumped by Q and has lost her head.


Hillary Clinton, Pakistani Foreign Minister Get The Giggles





Clinton warns Pakistan of ‘severe consequences’

 

[TechLahore]

As opposed to serious consequences in the sense of the action not being taken against these groups presently?

Let me assist you in parsing the post... 'these groups' being the future hypothetical groups to whom these imaginary attacks have been traced back to. As you will see in another thread here, there is a huffingtonpost piece which tears apart the nyt's tabloidesque claim about shahzads connections to the Taliban. There were no substantive connections and now the white house is making the right sort of noises on this front also.

Much of the discussion here is way off, in my opinion, to the extent that it envisages future US-Pak conflict scenarios. It ain't happenin'. I can understand your excitement at a statement such as this which can easily be twisted into a 'Beware! The Americans are coming!" sort of two-bit headline, but the fact is that no such threat was made and no action against the Pakistani state was even talked about. I will point out that CSF reimbursements over $600M were remitted to Pakistan right after this NYC incident. Too much is being made of it. Time to move on... The CNN front page certainly has.

 

[Ghareeb_Da_Baal]

Wondering if US is going to go after Saudi Arab first because of 9/11. They can then come after Pak. for times square after dealing with SA.

 

[yashchauhan]

^^^China helping Pakistan in war with US....are out of your mind....US is the biggest market for Chinese goods....and if US pulled of its investments then EU will also....and then China will fall....don't forget that China still is an export oriented economy unlike India which is domestically driven (small exports)with technology,innovation and entrepreneurship...now please don't highlight outsourcing because its not even worth a percent of our GDP!!But the good thing is that China is trying to come out of it while India is trying to increase its manufacturing which is already growing at the rate of 15% per annum.

China wants to remain in the mainstream of the world...and there is no such mutual friendship between China and Pakistan...China is trying to teach India a lesson through Pakistan...true friends are India and Russia or US and UK...time tested and stuborn..and if god goes good...then one day India and China....that's what you call true equal and mutual friendship....remember friendship is always between equals....rest are just exploitation...

 

[Marxist]

US warns Pakistan over terror: Report

WASHINGTON: The United States warned Pakistan after the failed Times Square bombing that it must crack down on Islamic militants or face severe consequences, The New York Times reported on late Saturday.

Citing unnamed US and Pakistani officials, the newspaper said US military commander in Afghanistan General Stanley McChrystal met with the Pakistani military commander General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani in Islamabad on Friday.

He urged Pakistan to quickly begin a military offensive against the Pakistani Taliban and Al-Qaeda in North Waziristan.

The meeting came as US investigators grilled Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistani-born US citizen whose large but poorly made bomb failed to detonate in New York's Times Square a week ago. He was arrested Monday aboard a plane preparing to take off for Dubai.

Shahzad, the 30-year-old son of a retired Pakistani Air Force officer, faces five terrorist charges in the United States.

US media reports said Shahzad's family knew at least two key Pakistani militants involved in terrorist activities.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Pakistan, in remarks published late Friday, that it faced "very severe consequences" if a terror plot like the Times Square bombing were traced to the country, although she also acknowledged Pakistan's increased cooperation against terrorism.

The Times said the new pressure from Washington was characterized by the Pakistani and US officials as a sharp turnaround from the relatively polite encouragement adopted by the administration of President Barack Obama in recent months.

It came amid increasing debate within the administration about how to proceed in the war on terror that included even "a boots-on-the-ground presence" on Pakistani soil, the report said.

Though the bombing in Times Square failed, Shahzad's ability to move back and forth between the United States and Pakistan has heightened fears in the Obama administration that another attempt at a terrorist attack could succeed, the paper said.

"We are saying, 'Sorry, if there is a successful attack, we will have to act'" within Pakistan, one of the US officials is quoted in the report as saying.

US warns Pakistan over terror: Report-Politics/Nation-News-The Economic Times

ANTARA News: US warns Pakistan over terror: report

---------- Post added at 11:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 AM ----------

 

[Airtel]

Clinton warns pakistan . USA can't survive without pakistan for one day in afghan.

Pakistan should refuse USA aid and shoot down their drones.

 

[LicencetoKill]

^^^China helping Pakistan in war with US....are out of your mind....US is the biggest market for Chinese goods....and if US pulled of its investments then EU will also....and then China will fall....don't forget that China still is an export oriented economy unlike India which is domestically driven (small exports)with technology,innovation and entrepreneurship...now please don't highlight outsourcing because its not even worth a percent of our GDP!!But the good thing is that China is trying to come out of it while India is trying to increase its manufacturing which is already growing at the rate of 15% per annum.

China wants to remain in the mainstream of the world...and there is no such mutual friendship between China and Pakistan...China is trying to teach India a lesson through Pakistan...true friends are India and Russia or US and UK...time tested and stuborn..and if god goes good...then one day India and China....that's what you call true equal and mutual friendship....remember friendship is always between equals....rest are just exploitation...

Tell me what india was before 10 or 15 years your currency value was lower than Pakistan.
With China you will also go 70% of your money is coming from call center, if some thing happen to USA all your call center will be closed next day.