What's new

Clinton Warns Pakistan of "severe consequences."

jees, wow!! this should be a guiness world ban record in an internet forum or something

now techy or agnosty should get a biryani treat from me, cant promise it though :D (i make a terrible biryani too and cant promise for a promising taste)
 
Last edited:
.
Rather harsh language for an ally even if it is aimed at the domestic audience. Also 60 minutes on CBS is not really aimed at the "Faux News" jingoist types, it's consistently the most serious and insightful program on US domestic issues. Interesting.
 
. .
^ disagree w our Indian participant, nemesis. See several other threads re white house toning it down and at one occasion refusing to respond to attacking questions about Pakistan. 'Serious consequences' here does not mean serious consequences for Pakistan, but serious consequences in the sense of the action taken against such groups.if Hillary meant to threaten Pakistan, she would have qualified this comment. She did no such thing. By the way, Pakistan's military is already super serious in this regard and is leading the charge and sacrificing more than any other military in meeting the challenge of terrorism. Every day we are annihilating these sw1nes wherever they are found. Without the PA's efforts, all would be lost for the world at large viz the spread of large scale terrorism...
 
.
disagree w our Indian participant, nemesis. See several other threads re white house toning it down and at one occasion refusing to respond to attacking questions about Pakistan. 'Serious consequences' here does not mean serious consequences for Pakistan, but serious consequences in the sense of the action taken against such groups.

As opposed to serious consequences in the sense of the action not being taken against these groups presently?
 
.
NEW YORK: The United States has warned of "severe consequences" if a successful extremist attack in America were traced back to Pakistan, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Friday in an interview with CBS' "60 Minutes."

The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for a failed bid to bomb New York's Times Square last Saturday. If proven, it would be the group's first act in the United States.

Pakistani-American Faisal Shahzad has been charged with driving the crude homemade bomb into Midtown Manhattan and said he acted alone, according to authorities. But investigators have uncovered possible links to the Pakistani Taliban and a Kashmiri Islamist group.

"We've gotten more cooperation. It's been a real sea change in the commitment we have seen from the Pakistani government. We want more, we expect more," Clinton said in the interview to be aired on Sunday. Excerpts were released on Friday.

"We've made it very clear that if -- heaven-forbid -- an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences," she said, without elaborating.

Shahzad, 30, who was born in Pakistan and became a U.S. citizen last year, has admitted to the failed plot and to receiving bomb-making training in a Taliban and al Qaeda stronghold in Pakistan, prosecutors said.

He has been charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and trying to kill and maim people, as well as other counts. Shahzad is yet to appear in court as he has waived his U.S. legal rights and is talking to investigators.

Clinton: 'severe consequences' in case of attack
 
.
WTF? why would there be severe consequences for Pakistan? How exactly is this our fault? Are they again threatening to bomb us back to stone age or this was just a ploy to force Pakistan to move further towards north and start another operation.
In either case the events and circumstances does not seem to favor Pakistan.
 
.
Severe consequences for who? The terrorists or the Pakistani government for not doing enough? How about protecting United States correctly and then blame the other people later. The guy almost ran away from this country. I call that a failure..a much bigger failure, than you would like Pakistan to improve upon.
 
.
swere consequences for whome? Pakistan or TTP?

These type of swere consequences were offered to Pervaiz Musharraf aswell are we at stone age yet?

The able zardari led government will be able to handle the situation like musharraf did let them strike TTP within Pakistan- No?
 
.
Severe consequences in case of attack: Clinton




NEW YORK: The United States has warned of “severe consequences” if a successful extremist attack in America were traced back to Pakistan, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Friday in an interview with CBS' “60 Minutes,” reports Reuters.

The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for a failed bid to bomb New York's Times Square last Saturday. If proven, it would be the group's first act in the United States.

Pakistani-American Faisal Shahzad has been charged with driving the crude homemade bomb into Midtown Manhattan and said he acted alone, according to authorities. But investigators have uncovered possible links to the Pakistani Taliban and a Kashmiri Islamist group.

“We've gotten more cooperation. It's been a real sea change in the commitment we have seen from the Pakistani government. We want more, we expect more,” Clinton said in the interview to be aired on Sunday. Excerpts were released on Friday.

“We've made it very clear that if — heaven-forbid — attacks like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences,” she said, without elaborating.

Shahzad, 30, who was born in Pakistan and became a US citizen last year, has admitted to the failed plot and to receiving bomb-making training in a Taliban and al-Qaeda stronghold in Pakistan, prosecutors said.

He has been charged with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and trying to kill and maim people, as well as other counts.

Shahzad is yet to appear in court as he has waived his US legal rights and is talking to investigators.

Better Relationship

Tension remained high in New York after Shahzad was plucked from an Emirates airline flight he boarded on Monday night even though he had been placed on a “no fly” list.

Several blocks of Times Square were shut down again on Friday for 90 minutes to investigate a suspicious package that turned out to be a lunch cooler.

Some analysts have speculated that if the Pakistani Taliban were involved in the Times Square plot, it could be responding to US drone attacks that have killed militants hiding in Pakistan as well as civilians.

The United States, which sees Pakistan's effort against militants as crucial to its fight against the Taliban in Afghanistan, has about 200 military personnel in Pakistan, including Special Operations forces on a training mission.

“We also have a much better relationship, military to military, intelligence to intelligence, government to government than we had before,” Clinton said. “I think that there was a double game going on in the previous years, where we got a lot of lip service but very little produced.”

“We've got a lot produced. We have seen the killing or capturing of a great number of the leadership of significant terrorist groups and we're going (to) continue that,” she said in the interview.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Friday the United States was prepared to provide more assistance to Pakistan if it wanted it in the wake of the attempted Times Square bombing.

DAWN.COM | World | Severe consequences in case of attack: Clinton
 
.
investigators have uncovered possible links to the Pakistani Taliban and a Kashmiri Islamist group.

Is this kashmir group LeT or some one else???/
 
.
Webby.. Just because a country failed to prevent an terror attack on itself(and its an impossible task which Pakistan knows too well), it will not give up its right to prosecute someone it feels is the attacker.. We all know that America is not India who can be tangled up in legal stonewalling by Pakistan. If they start believing (correctly or incorrectly) that Pakistan is complicit in an attack on US, nothing will stop them from doing another iraq in Pakistan...

But I think this statement domestically will be a foolish move by Clinton. The hawks in US political world will question the logic of waiting for a successful attack. Why would US want its citizens to be killed before it acts.. From an intention of the attacker's perspective, a failed attack is same as a successful attack..

Lets see how this pans out...
 
. .
Webby.. Just because a country failed to prevent an terror attack on itself(and its an impossible task which Pakistan knows too well), it will not give up its right to prosecute someone it feels is the attacker.. We all know that America is not India who can be tangled up in legal stonewalling by Pakistan. If they start believing (correctly or incorrectly) that Pakistan is complicit in an attack on US, nothing will stop them from doing another iraq in Pakistan...

But I think this statement domestically will be a foolish move by Clinton. The hawks in US political world will question the logic of waiting for a successful attack. Why would US want its citizens to be killed before it acts.. From an intention of the attacker's perspective, a failed attack is same as a successful attack..

Lets see how this pans out...

Your argument holds little or no value. What would Pakistan try to achieve by acting complicit or in other words support this terror act?

You also mention that nothing will stop U.S. doing another Iraq. There is a big difference in what Iraq was and what Pakistan is.

It is the failure of intelligence within the country. Pakistan can only do so much. The proof of that is the suicide bombing attacks within its borders. Would Pakistan be acting complicit in that sense?
 
.
I think I saw the name of Jaish mentioned somewhere...

so that mean Massod azhar is some involved with taliban.???

further investigations may tell more things.

Hillary is just kidding with pakistan..............they need pakistan at this time
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom