What's new

Climate Change l Global Warming l Update, News & Discussion

So? Making solar panel emits CO2. Also, mining for those rare earth elements emits CO2 they use diesel in mining machinery.
Shut up i already explain you factories use catalyst to release it as harmless gases or trap inside their chimneys and this already explain you diesel engines have more complete combustion so they emit less and less CO2 you're the most/worst stubborn troll here in PDF @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Shut up i already explain you factories use catalyst to release it as harmless gases or trap inside their chimneys and this already explain you diesel engines have more complete combustion so they emit less and less CO2 you're the most/worst stubborn troll here in PDF @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

In your imagination maybe. You can't beat CO2. CO2 is God's creation. Humans are God's puny little pets.
 
. . . .
.

It's okay. CO2 was 10 times higher than today when Cambrian explosion happened. Corals love CO2. You can keep fish in coca cola where CO2 is tens of thousands ppm. Coca cola is rated safe to people, fish, corals. I drink coca cola all the time.


A bit warmer is good. Pakistan has 200 million people. Sweden has 8 million people. People like warm.

And as for factories capturing CO2 tech take look
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage

No factory does that. Nowhere to put all that CO2 unless they rocket it into space.


They control CO with catalytic converter. They don't control CO2.


First 10 ppm CO2 absorb 98% of whatever IR CO2 absorbs. The remaining 2% that pass through is negligible.

The ozone layer, our Earth’s sunscreen, absorbs about 98 percent of this devastating UV light.

https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ozone-layer/

The total mass of ozone in the atmosphere is about 3 billion metric tons. That may seem like a lot, but it is only 0.00006 percent of the atmosphere. The peak concentration of ozone occurs at an altitude of roughly 32 kilometers (20 miles) above the surface of the Earth. At that altitude, ozone concentration can be as high as 15 parts per million (0.0015 percent).

https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/SH.html
 
.
It's okay. CO2 was 10 times higher than today when Cambrian explosion happened.
you're too stupid to understand, tell me that which population in Cambrian explosion we had @undertakerwwefan
A bit warmer is good. Pakistan has 200 million people. Sweden has 8 million people. People like warm.
you're seeing one sided picture you're neglecting drawbacks of CO2 to the atmosphere @undertakerwwefan
No factory does that. Nowhere to put all that CO2 unless they rocket it into space.
almost every factories in western world would do that according to govt laws @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
They control CO with catalytic converter. They don't control CO2.
Yes they control all harmful gases including CO2 @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:
First 10 ppm CO2 absorb 98% of whatever IR CO2 absorbs. The remaining 2% that pass through is insignificant.

The ozone layer, our Earth’s sunscreen, absorbs about 98 percent of this devastating UV light.

https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ozone-layer/

The total mass of ozone in the atmosphere is about 3 billion metric tons. That may seem like a lot, but it is only 0.00006 percent of the atmosphere. The peak concentration of ozone occurs at an altitude of roughly 32 kilometers (20 miles) above the surface of the Earth. At that altitude, ozone concentration can be as high as 15 parts per million (0.0015 percent).

https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/SH.html
what is trying to Prove, CO2 is harmful to atmosphere and that all @undertakerwwefan :hitwall:
 
. .
you're too stupid to understand, tell me that which population in Cambrian explosion we had @undertakerwwefan

you're seeing one sided picture you're neglecting drawbacks of CO2 to the atmosphere @undertakerwwefan

almost every factories in western world would do that according to govt laws @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

Yes they control all harmful gases including CO2 @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy:

what is trying to Prove, CO2 is harmful to atmosphere and that all @undertakerwwefan :hitwall:

So what? US CO2 emission is a drop in the bucket compared to China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea CO2 emission.

almost every factories in western world would do that according to govt laws @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

Which factory? Such a machinery would be extremely CO2 intensive to operate so I doubt they do that.
 
.
. .
No factory controls CO2.
BARKING-DOGS-WHY-THEY-BARK-AND-HOW-TO-STOP-THEM-Featured-image.jpg
Dog-Scooting-750x405.jpg

@undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:
 
. .
https://www.thewhig.com/news/local-...ht-word-for-climate-change-kingston-prof-says

images


KINGSTON – If the word fits, use it, said a Queen’s University biology professor who has spent his career researching the impact of climate change.

Prof. John Smol, the Canada Research Chair in Environmental Change and president-elect of the Academy of Science with the Royal Society of Canada, said Kingston city council’s climate emergency declaration on Tuesday night was an important step to getting real local action.

“It uses the word emergency and that is a good word to use when you are talking about climate change and what we are doing to the planet because it is an emergency. I believe it is the most important issue that has faced humanity ever,” Smol said.

“In 100 years, that is going to be the major issue that everyone is talking about, if we survive, and what we are doing and why weren’t they doing it.

“It is an emergency and it is about time we started using these words.”

City council unanimously voted to declare a climate emergency “for the purposes of naming, framing and deepening our commitment to protecting our economy, our ecosystems and our community from climate change.”

Smol said the declaration could allow council and city staff to consider the cost of climate change when making decisions about programs, services and infrastructure.

Prior to Tuesday night’s vote, Colleen Gareau, a co-founder of Kingston Climate Hub, said the city needs to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 16 per cent within the current term of council to put it on track for a 1.5 C temperature increase.

The sectors that produce the most greenhouse gases – transportation and buildings – could be the quickest way to meet stricter emissions reductions, Gareau said.

Electrifying the Kingston Transit fleet, getting cars off the road, and putting in place building standards that reduce emissions would help meet emissions targets, she added.

“It is something as simple as having the building a little cooler in the winter and a little warmer in the summer,” Smol said.

Passing the declaration, especially with an unanimous vote, puts Kingston in position to be a leader in climate change policy and demonstrates that the city is taking the problem seriously, Smol said.

“Kingston has always been a city that often, not always, but often can punch above its weight.”

Using the word emergency could also help clear up a disconnect that persists between what the scientific evidence shows and the skepticism many people continue to hold.

Smol said a 2017 peer-reviewed analysis showed that between 1991 and 2015, 54,164 peer-reviewed scientific papers (99.94 per cent) concluded that human activity caused climate change. Only 31 research papers concluded that human activity was not to blame.

But a 2018 Abacus Data poll showed that one-third of Canadians are not convinced of the connection between human activity and climate change.

“You hear about the climate controversy. There is no controversy,” Smol said. “I would have loved to be wrong. I would love someone to show ‘John you are wrong.’ I would be delighted.

“I take no pleasure in what is happening, but we are in a very serious situation.”
 
.
Back
Top Bottom