What's new

Cleric comes out in support of women protection bill

Khan_21

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
-6
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Cleric comes out in support of women’s protection bill - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: As critics from religious groups and parties make headlines with their opposition to the Punjab Protection of Women against Violence Act 2016, one cleric has come forward to support the law instead.

Pakistan Ulema Council (PUC) chairperson Hafiz Mohammad Tahir Ashrafi on Monday said those elements that used to call for banning girls’ education had no connection to Islam.

“These people are speaking in ignorance, but the women protection bill will assist in ending violence against women,” Mr Ashrafi said. “There is no point in the criticism by some scholars that this bill will distort the family system of the country”.

While speaking to a delegate of the PUC Women’s Wing and women seminary students on Monday, the liberal cleric said that instead of criticising almost all the reformist laws, ulema and the country’s religious leadership should come forward with progressive suggestions.

“I would call upon the clergy to play a responsible role for girls’ education, to help eradicate other social ills like dowry and so on from the country,” he said.

Mr Ashrafi said that since it was established, PUC has been making endeavours and raising its voice for women’s rights.

PUC is also one of the few religious councils that did not protest the execution of Mumtaz Qadri.

On the day of the execution, Mr Ashrafi said the “execution of Mumtaz Qadri [was the] implementation on laws of the state”, and it was the government’s responsibility to ensure the protection of its citizens and make sure the laws of the state are implemented.

He said that civilised society would be turned into ashes if killing and warfare was allowed on the grounds of emotion and affiliations.

Addressing women seminary students, the PUC chairperson said: “Islam does not allow men to resort to violence against women, and the teaching of Islam witness to the fact that Islam orders punishments for men who resort to torture against their daughters, wives and women of their homes.

Always found tahir ashrafi to be level headed . Welcome change
 
.
While I welcome his stance, why did it have to be Ashrafi of all people? This is gonna do more harm than good, and give ammo to those nut jobs that say only drunks are supporting this bill.
 
.
Do we need a support of drunken clerics on this ??
 
. .
Is it still a bill or has it been passed and signed in to a law?
I guess I should refer to it as law now, considered that (you're right) it did get passed. CII tried to overstep their boundary, by suggesting that the government may have commit treason, but then got their shit slapped by the public.

Do we need a support of drunken clerics on this ??
Unfortunately, he's still very influential, so yes.
 
. .
I guess I should refer to it as law now, considered that (you're right) it did get passed. CII tried to overstep their boundary, by suggesting that the government may have commit treason, but then got their shit slapped by the public.
Is there any legal impediment for the Act to function now?
Or Can it be rolled back for any reason (other than your State Assembly repealing it) ?

I am not well versed with Pakistani legal systems therefore I ask these questions.
 
.
Is there any legal impediment for the Act to function now?
Or Can it be rolled back for any reason (other than your State Assembly repealing it) ?

I am not well versed with Pakistani legal systems therefore I ask these questions.
It's law, no way to repeal other than high court, or parliament.

There is a legal challenge in court, but it's expected to fall flat on it's feet. The government is simply going to outspend the guy (challenging the law) into submission, as it has numerous times in the past.
 
. .
Being an American Christian, it's not my fight but that would seem to be problematic. :agree:
The worst thing about this is that, despite him being a known drunk and getting into fights with other members of the CII, he's still influential enough to consistently get a seat at the CII.

If there is any strong argument to abolish the CII, it's him.

Yet, progressive and sane Pakistani have found themselves having to rely on this guy.
 
.
Is there any legal impediment for the Act to function now?
Or Can it be rolled back for any reason (other than your State Assembly repealing it) ?

I am not well versed with Pakistani legal systems therefore I ask these questions.
It can only be struck down if the Courts find it ultra vires of the Constitution.

Which is unlilely since its a procedural law for the most part (foolish media reporting aside, domestic violence is and has been plenty illegal) and the powers given to the Trial Court are discretionary rather than mandatory in nature.

(I am a lawyer BTW).
 
. . .
Huh? What's funny about what I said? o_O
your government thinks everything in the world is it's fight. the high horse they sit on they've made themselves the world police. and like the american police itself, they're corrupt and cunning and abuse their authority without accountability.
 
.
your government thinks everything in the world is it's fight. the high horse they sit on they've made themselves the world police. and like the american police itself, they're corrupt and cunning and abuse their authority without accountability.
Quite a lot of extrapolation from one single comment I made, having only to do with agreeing with a Pakistani poster, as to the fitness of the Imam in question. Been saving that up, have you? :lol:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom