CJP asks why SC should deal with political matters when its decisions are criticised at rallies

[Indus Pakistan]

questioned why the Supreme Court should deal with political matters

Why? Because you already indulge in political matters when you intruded Deputy Speakers ruling.

 

[Rank]

Ya these motherboards working 24/7, thats why Pakistan Justice and law @ 130 out of 139....

 

[Adnan12333]

These courts should be closed forever bcoz we know no one will ever get justice from here.

 

[Asimzranger]

Olx pay bechday yay court

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,

https://twitter.com/x/status/1515803967254675467

.,.,.,,..,

 

[khansaheeb]

Why did the dodgy supreme court judges interfered in the first place, they have only themselves to blame the mess they have currently created, they have blatantly interfered into parliamentary affairs and over ruling the speaker, these dodgy judges should be ashamed of themselves.

They gave back a favour for their appointments.

 

[TigerOfMysore]

Why are you asking it from me, or trying to impose your interpretation when the respected SC has already interpretated it for the nation?

And if you disagree, then you have the procedure to take votes and overrule the SC decision.

There is no process to overrule a SC decision. No votes that can undo the ruling. So not sure what you are saying.
what you keep missing is SC has NO JURISDICTION in this space. This is a constitutional grab that they have no right on. The same way the military has no right constitutionally to impose Martial Law outside of the civilian structure, the same way the SC has no legal basis to involve itself in the process and workings of the Parliament.
What the executive should have done was to take on the contempt and not enforced it - they should have made it a constitutional crisis and refused to accept this overreach. They did a dis-service to the Parliament by folding.

 

[ghazi52]

,.,.,.

,.,.,.,.,

 

[Lone Nazi]

apni marzi se suo moto lya tha.
uspy criticize kro to roty hain ye stooges

 

[ghazi52]

Imran Khan stay in Pakistan.......

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7086401178484952326

,.,.,.,.,

 

[JohnWick]

12 mid night only pimps prostitutes and pakistani judges work

And after the SC judgement of 5-0 only Pakistani politician can incinerate the Law !

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7086384182485683461

,,..,

 

[Lehrasap]

There is no process to overrule a SC decision. No votes that can undo the ruling. So not sure what you are saying.

Please don't pose as if you don't know it.

You could win majority in the national assembly and parliament and then make a new LAW which invalidates the ruling and reasoning of SC in this case.

In the present situation, I fully agree with SC's decision and there is a limit to it, otherwise the majority party with its speaker becomes a dictator and ruins all the rules of parliament. They are politicians, and they have no morality except for usurping all the powers.

Till the time, the parliament does not have the laws of how to stop the dictatorship and lawlessness of the majority party along with its speaker, it should be the domain of SC to put the limits and stop them.

what you keep missing is SC has NO JURISDICTION in this space. This is a constitutional grab that they have no right on.

Again, it is your interpretation, not of the respected SC.

SC and its decision is legally much more respected than any politician including Imran Khan and his supporters.

They did a dis-service to the Parliament by folding.

Respected SC disagree with you.
You are standing on the wrong path of law.
You want to allow even the Evil Intentions of the majority party in Parliament and become a dictator, which respected SC does not allowed, and rightly so.

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,.,
کبھی ان کیلئے بھی رات کے 12 بجے عدالت لگاو نا جج صاحب پلیز

#امپورٹڈ_حکومت_نامنظور

Please bring a court order for them at 12 o'clock at night ....

.