CJ Making a Mole Out Of Procedural Lacuna

[Oruc]

Why would govt put army chief in this position in the first place.

 

[Inqlab-e-Pakistan]

Next 26 hours most important i am expecting 3 things if decision not came in this time period from supreme court.

1. Action from 111 Bargade. (Most likely)
2. COAS refuse extension (Chances 50/50)
3. Emergency. (Chances High but SC strike down)

 

[ejaz007]

Is resignation of PM on the cards.

 

[Yaseen1]

i not think,if allowing nawaz to go is considered then govt is also considered as hypocrate as their spokesman confirmed that his platelets are low without keeping in consideration risk that report is fake and avoiding making such comments and also govt not approached for apeal in sc like they are approaching for extension of coas so you cannot make public fool

When you let corrupt go then reapect for judge and court will he no more.

Extension is not new
3 years extension givem by gillani to gen kiyani in 2010
Then another extension given by nawaz to raheel sharif

So who is hyprocate here?
And here SC creating movie while sleeping when NS was leaving and taking Suo Moto.

Now your reply will also involve hypocrisy.

 

[crankthatskunk]

Shameful from a CJ who said he wants to avoid exposure and more interested in speeding the justice for the common people.

Last week when he responded to the comments/requests made by PM in his speech. His tone and demeanour was very insulting for the PM.

There is absolutely no doubt that the judiciary let Nawaz out of the country.
Justice Khabees Min Iblees made sure that he writes his judgement in such a way to pave way for Nawaz departure to London.

This is not the first time that COAS had been given extension in Pakistan.
Where were these judges for decades!!!
This is the question the nation should ask from Khosa.

Next would be the shenanigans of retired justice, head of ECP. Hand picked by the looters Butts and Zardaris.
I am certain he is going to show to the nation his importance before he complete his term.

These old men are bitten by their own prides, ridiculous totally.

 

[Mrc]

Next 26 hours most important i am expecting 3 things if decision not came in this time period from supreme court.

1. Action from 111 Bargade. (Most likely)
2. COAS refuse extension (Chances 50/50)
3. Emergency. (Chances High but SC strike down)

No action is acceptable . Army is not bajwas personal londi....

If kicked out he shud go or will be taken out

 

[Yaseen1]

in musharaf tenure sc failed to turn down emergency so how they can do this now if imposed

An emergency is not going to deter the Supreme Court. Please remember that the SC can also strike down emergency declaration.

 

[The Eagle]

there is high risk of imposition of emergency if this extension is not allowed and there are reports that this was discussed in cabinet meeting so I think cj any such decision may lead to severe situation which we cannot afford at current circumstances if gen bajwa and govt want extension at any cost

Please avoid Geo News etc. There are procedures set in line for such kind of situation like COAS can go on leaves as well and who can ignore the fact of Death. The severe situation argument may be interesting in regard to political point scoring but situation isn't bad like the media is propagating.

 

[ejaz007]

Gen Bajwa's extension: Who is the petitioner?

Listen

Riaz Rahi

ISLAMABAD: It has been a pattern in recent times of heating judicial activism that an intriguing individual comes up with a petition on burning political/ constitutional issue and triggers a debate and suddenly disappears.

Same was repeated on Tuesday when a petitioner threw almost certain extension/ re-appointment of Army Chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa in doubt. It was Riaz Rahi who challenged General Bajwa’s tenure first and later moved an application to withdraw the petition but the top judge, however, rejected the plea, observing it fell into the domain of public interest under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution.

In April 2018, Riaz Rahi challenged appointment of Justice Qazi Faez Isa as judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The timing and ground of the petition against the Chief of Army Staff was very important as General Qamar Javed Bajwa has to retire tomorrow, Nov 28, 2019. Similarly, the timing of filing petition against Justice Qazi Faez Isa as the SC judge and his appointment as the Balochistan High Court chief justice in August 2009 looked like one such effort to undermine the credibility of a jurist who otherwise was known to be as an upright man among the legal fraternity. Now judge Faez Isa is facing a trial in the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) as well as in the apex court.

In March 2018, Riaz Rahi filed two contempt petitions against ex-premier Nawaz Sharif. On Dec 2013, the IHC rejected Riaz Rahi’s petition challenging the constitution of a special court for the treason trial of former president Musharraf. On July 10, 2017, Riaz Rahi filed a petition seeking a halt on transfers and postings of all public servants on the directions of then PM Nawaz Sharif until the final decision of the Panama case was announced in the apex court. All petitions were dismissed and this list goes on with Justice Faez Isa’s fine of Rs10, 000 imposed on Aug 13, 2015. The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Justice Shaukat Siddiqui imposed a fine of Rs100,000 on Riaz Rahi in 2014 and then after a few months, Justice Athar Minallah of the IHC fined him Rs10,000 on filing frivolous petitions challenging the judicial policy and electoral system of the country and for withdrawal of security from former CJP Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. Justice Sheikh Hakim Ali of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur bench, had jailed Riaz Rahi for one month for contempt of court and also fined Rs30,000 in 2005 when he, during the hearing of his case, misbehaved with the judge. In March 2010, Riaz Rahi challenged reinstatement and appointment of the then CJ Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and Justices Ghulam Rabbani and Khalilur Rehman Ramday but later his entry into SC premises was temporarily blocked. On Dec 17, 2013, Riaz Rahi challenged the creation of a special court to try former president Pervez Musharraf for high treason in the IHC. On April 15, 2009, Riaz Rahi filed a writ petition in the IHC challenging the notification of Justice Sheikh Hakim Ali as a Supreme Court judge. On August 8, 2017, Riaz Rahi lodged petition against ex-PM Shahid Khaqan Abbasi’s order of forming a committee to probe MNA Ayesha Gulalai’s allegations in the IHC.

Riaz Rahi, despite repeated attempts made by The News to take his viewpoint, did not respond.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/575030-who-is-the-petitioner

 

[The Eagle]

No action is acceptable . Army is not bajwas personal londi....

If kicked out he shud go or will be taken out

If kicked out? will be taken out? and what kind of language is that personal----? why being triggered as & when it is about military? We can talk in civil manners.

 

[AZ1]

Shameful from a CJ which said he wants to avoid exposure and more interested in speeding the justice for the common people.

Last week when he responded to the comments/requests made by PM in his speech. His tone and demeanour was very insulting for the PM.

There is absolutely no doubt that the judiciary let Nawaz out of the country.
Justice Khabees Min Iblees made sure that he writes his judgement in such a way to pave way for Nawaz departure to London.

This is not the first time that COAS had been given extension in Pakistan.
Where were these judges for decades!!!
This is the question the nation should ask from Khosa.

Next would be the shenanigans of retired justice, head of ECP. Hand picked by the looters Butts and Zardaris.
I am certain he is going to show to the nation his importance before he complete his term.

These old men are bitten by their own prides, ridiculous totally.

How dare you raise these question. Its condempt of court and dont ever say anything about court because all are working fine.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

 

[Xestan]

in musharaf tenure sc failed to turn down emergency so how they can do this now if imposed

SC did issue verdict against it and asked every member of the Armed Forces to not follow the unlawful directives. But well, officers decided to commit treason and Musharraf will definitely pay for it someday. But now is different. We have a civilian setup. Contempt of court and another Prime Minister will be gone.

 

[Yaseen1]

shaukat Aziz, then p.m was never charged with contempt charges by sc

SC did issue verdict against it and asked every member of the Armed Forces to not follow the unlawful directives. But well, officers decided to commit treason and Musharraf will definitely pay for it someday. But now is different. We have a civilian setup. Contempt of court and another Prime Minister will be gone.

 

[maithil]

So turns out that wrong section in Army rule was amended last night. Either government is seriously lacking competence.