What's new

Circumcision helps stop wart virus

Status
Not open for further replies.

TruthSeeker

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
6,390
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Circumcision helps stop wart virus, study finds

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON | Thu Jan 6, 2011 6:31pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Researchers have documented yet another health benefit for circumcision, which can protect men against the AIDS virus, saying it can protect their wives and girlfriends from a virus that causes cervical cancer.

Wives and girlfriends of circumcised men had a 28 percent lower rate of infection over two years with the human papilloma virus or HPV, which causes warts and cervical cancer, they reported in the Lancet medical journal on Thursday.

"Our findings indicate that male circumcision should now be accepted as an efficacious intervention for reducing the prevalence and incidence of HPV infections in female partners. However, protection is only partial; the promotion of safe sex practices is also important," Dr. Maria Wawer and colleagues at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore wrote.

Wawer's team piggybacked the HPV study onto a larger study that has shown circumcised men are less likely to be infected with the human immunodeficiency virus that causes AIDS.

"We enrolled HIV-negative men and their female partners between 2003 and 2006, in Rakai, Uganda," they wrote in their report in the Lancet medical journal.

They were able to get details on HPV infections for nearly 1,000 of the women, all identified by men as long-term sex partners such as wives. After two years, 27.8 percent of the steady partners of circumcised men had HPV infections, compared to 38.7 percent of the partners of uncircumcised men.

HPV infection is best known as the primary cause of cervical cancer, but it causes genital warts and can also lead to cancers of the anus, penis, head and neck.

There are dozens of strains of HPV, which are highly contagious and which infect the majority of the population within a few years of beginning sexual activity. Most people clear the virus but in some, it can cause changes that lead to cancer.

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide and is expected to kill 328,000 this year, mostly in developing countries.

GlaxoSmithKline and Merck make vaccines against HPV but they are not available to most women in developing countries.

Circumcision removes the foreskin of the penis, which is rich in immune system cells targeted by HIV and perhaps other viruses. Taking off the foreskin likely makes the penis less likely to carry a range of microbes, Wawer's team said.

"Male circumcision has now been shown to decrease HIV, herpes simplex virus-2, and HPV infections and genital ulcer disease in men, and also HPV infection, trichomoniasis, and bacterial vaginosis and genital ulcer disease in their female partners," Wawer's team wrote.

"Thus, male circumcision reduces the risk of several sexually transmitted infections in both sexes, and these benefits should guide public health policies for neonatal, adolescent, and adult male circumcision programs."

Circumcision helps stop wart virus, study finds | Reuters
 
. .
I guess science is now proving that why 1400 years ago we were told to have this done asap ;)

And God told the Israelites even before he told you!! (We Christians, too....). In fact, it is interesting that circumcision is a practice advanced primarily by People of the Book(s). Something else we have in common.
 
.
"Thus, male circumcision reduces the risk of several sexually transmitted infections in both sexes, and these benefits should guide public health policies for neonatal, adolescent, and adult male circumcision programs."

I guess science is now proving that why 1400 years ago we were told to have this done asap ;)

It was told to the Jews long before Islam.
Besides, both Judaism and Islam allow sex only within marriage.
So if the partners are faithful to each other, there wouldn't really be any chance of contracting Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
So where's the need for circumcision, which isn't 100% protection anyway?
 
.
do yoga and pranayam instead.
wart virus ? u can even get rid of cancer.
 
.
It was told to the Jews long before Islam.
Besides, both Judaism and Islam allow sex only within marriage.
So if the partners are faithful to each other, there wouldn't really be any chance of contracting Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
So where's the need for circumcision, which isn't 100% protection anyway?

both Judaism and Islam allow sex only within marriage.
Add Christianity to that list:
You shall not commit adultery.

So if the partners are faithful to each other, there wouldn't really be any chance of contracting Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Incorrect, hygiene is also a major factor such as yeast infection, Candidiasis of the penis and other such infections can be avoided by simple hygiene practices not to mention circumcision actually prevents the build up of Smegma in the male sexual organs preventing candidiasis which can be a major problem for men.

So where's the need for circumcision, which isn't 100% protection anyway?
Read what i wrote above, the need for circumcision is actually scientifically good practice especially if you consider that all three of the major religions spread in a hot environment where urine trapped in the foreskin would cause amongst many other things horrendous skin diseases and warts.

Just my two cents.
 
.
Read what i wrote above, the need for circumcision is actually scientifically good practice especially if you consider that all three of the major religions spread in a hot environment where urine trapped in the foreskin would cause amongst many other things horrendous skin diseases and warts.

Just my two cents.

do u believe the maker of this universe, the almighty god is actually so stupid that he making humans like this ?
 
.
Myths about Circumcision

Dr Peter Ball MB,B Chir

John Dalton Bsc,Msc


Modern, non-religious circumcision began in the Victorian era as a means of deliberately desensitising and denuding the penis in order to discourage masturbation, which doctors then believed was the cause of insanity, epilepsy, hysteria, tuberculosis, short-sightedness, and death.

In 1891, Jonathan Hutchinson, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, in his article "On Circumcision as a Preventative of Masturbation," wrote:

Measures more radical than circumcision would, if public opinion permitted their adoption, be a true kindness to many patients of both sexes. [Jonathan Hutchinson. On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation. Archives of Surgery 1891;2:267-268]

The myth that circumcision improves hygiene originated at this time to mean the improvement of moral hygiene.

Clarence was addicted to the secret vice practised among boys. I performed circumcision. He needed the rightful punishment of cutting pains after his illicit pleasures.[N. Bergman. Report of a Few Cases of Circumcision. Journal of Orificial Surgery 1898;7:249-251.]

By the turn of the century, amputation of the foreskin was "scientifically proven" to cure and prevent malnutrition, paralysis, bed-wetting, hip-joint disease, headache, alcoholism, criminality, club-foot, and heart disease.
Even in the 1930s, some doctors openly declared in the British Medical Journal that sexual oppression of young men was their motivation.

Nature intends that the adult male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the glans of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that masturbation is much less common in the circumcised. [Cockshut RW. Circumcision (letter). Br Med J. 1935; 19 October: 764.]

New myths about circumcision have arisen and continue to arise. These are as unfounded and misguided as the excuses used in the Victorian era. Even if they were not, amputation of a healthy part of the body is a poor and barbaric means of disease control. On this basis one could recommend amputation of the toes under the pretext of preventing athlete's foot for example, and pre-pubescent castration would have a very high success rate in the prevention of venereal disease.

It is generally agreed that there are no proven physical health benefits from new-born male circumcision [Prof Liam Donaldson, Chief Medical Officer for England; Letter to NORM-UK, 6th September 2000]

In reality, non-religious circumcision is being perpetuated for a number of reasons: ignorance, arrogance, perversion, general disregard for patients' bodies, denial (perhaps because the surgeon is himself circumcised), and, in some countries, profit for the commercially motivated who can get paid both for the surgery and for 'donating' the amputated foreskin for research.

Despite the obviously irrational cruelty of circumcision, the profit incentive in American medical practice is unlikely to allow science or human rights principles to interrupt the highly lucrative American circumcision industry. It is now time for European medical associations loudly to condemn the North American medical community for participating in and profiting from what is by any standard a senseless and barbaric sexual mutilation of innocent children. [Paul M. Fleiss. Circumcision. Lancet 1995;345:927.]

Circumcision does not prevent penile cancer.
Circumcision does not prevent cervical cancer in the female partners of circumcised men.
Circumcision does not prevent sexually transmitted diseases.
Circumcision does not prevent AIDS or HIV infection.
Circumcision does not improve penile hygiene.
Circumcision does not prevent infections.
Circumcision does not prevent urinary tract infection.
Circumcision is not painless.
Circumcision does not prevent masturbation.

Does circumcision cure or prevent things?
 
.
I would like to remind women, that if female genital mutilation is a mutilation and unecessary and painful and unconsentual and so on... so is male genital mutilation, i.e. circumcision.

You don't gouge your eye because you fear eye diseases or cut your feet because they are smelly, you just try to keep good hygiene.

Originally, the Jews only cut the extra tip, it is only 2000 years ago that to deterate those not-religious or trying to hide or leave the faith, some rabis decided to cut everything. This has nothing to do with god or hygiene or even moral!!! It was non-religious Jews who invented foreskin restoration, i.e. epispasm (I forgot the exact term, something like Judeo pendulum, how do you say 'weight' in latin?)
 
.
do u believe the maker of this universe, the almighty god is actually so stupid that he making humans like this ?

Oh dear... I would rather examine the merits of science and it's applications on mankind, rather that carry on a fruitless debate on faith.

Forgive me but my faith with the divine is personal and i don't like brandishing it and nor do i like to express it.

Many thanks for your rebuttal however.
 
. .
do u believe the maker of this universe, the almighty god is actually so stupid that he making humans like this ?

Cut your thing or we will cut it for you from root !!! What kind a BS is this???
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom