Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You still beat us here by 300,000. Quite a feat, no?
30,000 (a 2% increase) in fact (as opposed to 300,000).
Let's not use real "Indian mathematics" now (not the stuff you stole from Pakistan and called "Indian" ).
And that stuff would be?
Your logic here is a JOKE
Exactly as it was meant to be.
Just pointing out that posting a number of links may not always prove that one is right as is being impled in this thread.
The links should point to credible sources. And still it is no substitute for common sense and an ability to see things in perspective.
Most of Panini's stuff, Brahmagupta's stuff, Pingula's works, and plenty more. These are all Pakistani mathematicians. See the other history threads for more.
Back on topic.
Agreed. But posting a number of credible, neutral, relevant links, does increase the chance the incident is correct.
Was there a country named Pakistan during their time?
Or even the ideology based on which the partition happened in 1947?
I thought Jinnah demanded Pakistan for the Muslims of India! Has something changed since 1947?
Most of Panini's stuff, Brahmagupta's stuff, Pingula's works, and plenty more. These are all Pakistani mathematicians. See the other history threads for more.
Now I may consider Pakistani arguments to come up with a post facto theory of their ancient nationhood as pathetic when their own textbooks tell them that their history starts with Arab invasion (Jahiliya before that!), but I guess, you are right that this is not the place to go into that.
But pl. don't quote Churchil. You won't like it when you come to know of his views about Islam.
Of course he did not hold Indians (that included Pakistanis then) in any high esteem. He was basically a person of double standards as far as the British empire was concerned.