What's new

Chinese Weapon Exports

. .
dvhwg_0uyaenzlu.jpg
 
. .
@Figaro

1599774662829.png





What do you think of this slightly older news? It is also rumored they took a stock in the whole company


The anti-tank variant has a four-round launcher that raises from the rear compartment and appeared to be armed with the Poly Technologies GAM-102 anti-tank missile that uses an imaging infrared seeker to guide itself to its target. The IMUT video showed the missile being tested from a Dongfeng CSK141 light armoured vehicle but not an ST-100.

The precision attack missile variant was shown with two different types of weapon, one of which was seen labelled as the CM-501GA, another Poly Technologies product. The video included test footage that it said showed the missile hitting a target 41.3 km away with an accuracy of 0.12 m.

The other weapon resembled the CM-501XA loitering munition, which Poly Technologies says has an endurance of 30 minutes and a range of 70 km. Both the CM-501GA and CM-501XA can be carried in the same vertical launcher.
 
.
@Figaro

View attachment 668721




What do you think of this slightly older news? It is also rumored they took a stock in the whole company


The anti-tank variant has a four-round launcher that raises from the rear compartment and appeared to be armed with the Poly Technologies GAM-102 anti-tank missile that uses an imaging infrared seeker to guide itself to its target. The IMUT video showed the missile being tested from a Dongfeng CSK141 light armoured vehicle but not an ST-100.

The precision attack missile variant was shown with two different types of weapon, one of which was seen labelled as the CM-501GA, another Poly Technologies product. The video included test footage that it said showed the missile hitting a target 41.3 km away with an accuracy of 0.12 m.

The other weapon resembled the CM-501XA loitering munition, which Poly Technologies says has an endurance of 30 minutes and a range of 70 km. Both the CM-501GA and CM-501XA can be carried in the same vertical launcher.
I saw this, Egypt has a real need for MRAPs IMO, much more so than any APC or IFV. The fact they are using Chinese subsystems is interesting though ... I'd thought they would have gone for Russian given the very strong defense corporation between those two.
 
.
I saw this, Egypt has a real need for MRAPs IMO, much more so than any APC or IFV. The fact they are using Chinese subsystems is interesting though ... I'd thought they would have gone for Russian given the very strong defense corporation between those two.
To be fair, China offers much better equipment and more comparable to Western technology. Russia is moving very slow, and their missile systems in general just seem dated if you know what I mean. I hope this deal included TOT in some form.
 
. . .
.
Jordan A-300 MLRS (?)
1592577652021.png

 
.
Jordan A-300 MLRS (?)
View attachment 673943
I pointed this out a while ago my friend but you did not respond.
 
.
I pointed this out a while ago my friend but you did not respond.
Good catch. It indeed looks like Chinese MLRS having reached world leading standards at this point .... artillery was always a strong point for the Chinese and they indeed seem to have pressed on with this advantage. How many A-300 MLRS units will Jordan be ordering?
 
.
Good catch. It indeed looks like Chinese MLRS having reached world leading standards at this point .... artillery was always a strong point for the Chinese and they indeed seem to have pressed on with this advantage. How many A-300 MLRS units will Jordan be ordering?
I don't know the number as that is usually not shared with public but they are already operating Chinese WM-120 apparently which is a modified WM-80 improved in range, and some other specifications. This means the Chinese must be reliable as Jordan is a repeat customer, and that China willing to sell a long range MLRS unlike America, and Western European countries.

1601262325844.png
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom