Chinese VP meets Vietnamese army chief

[FairAndUnbiased]

Japanese?????



But why Chinese have such a short memory. Jap topics really hurts u guys.

That's not China (PRC). That's ROC. ROC was totally different than PRC.

 

[Contract Killer]

That's not China (PRC). That's ROC. ROC was totally different than PRC.

So you mean to say its not Chinese who fought the war with Japs?? It was Political party?? If so, then why you all still grieve for those massacres and brutality done by Japanese?? Why don't you just let it go saying that since it was done during ROC, hence during those days we Chinese were not brave?

Also it means If tomorrow PRC is changed in China, then even blood/ Thinking/ attitude of Chinese changes??

Sorry but it is strange logic.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

So you mean to say its not Chinese who fought the war with Japs?? It was Political party?? If so, then why you all still grieve for those massacres and brutality done by Japanese?? Why don't you just let it go saying that since it was done during ROC, hence during those days we Chinese were not brave?

Also it means If tomorrow PRC is changed in China, then even blood/ Thinking/ attitude of Chinese changes??

Sorry but it is strange logic.

1.) The massacres were indeed done by Japan, to Chinese people.
2.) However, the government responsible for defending Chinese people was not the PRC, and current leadership holds no responsibility for ROC weakness.
3.) Because the victims are Chinese, the current leadership has every right to complain and protest. However, they simultaneously hold no responsibility for the attack, because it was the ROC's job to defend the country and they failed.

 

[Contract Killer]

1.) The massacres were indeed done by Japan, to Chinese people.
2.) However, the government responsible for defending Chinese people was not the PRC, and current leadership holds no responsibility for ROC weakness.
3.) Because the victims are Chinese, the current leadership has every right to complain and protest. However, they simultaneously hold no responsibility for the attack, because it was the ROC's job to defend the country and they failed.

If i go by your own logic, then Its not people of India who were weak, but the leadership of that time are to be blamed? that means Congress and there policy was weak.

So if BJP comes in power, they will not hold responsibility of 62. And things will change immediately.

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

No, they are asking for mercy. The last fight between China and Vietnam is 1988 which PLAN almost wiped out their navy.
Johnson South Reef Skirmish - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It should be called collective massacres are more accurate. Cannot say it was a "navy battle" because Vietnam side had only transport ships and construction troops, who did not have any weapons. Meanwhile China side used warships with heavy weapons. I think they were more difficult to fire if at that time Vietnam had warships there.

It is the clearest evidence to prove the illegality of China's claims on the Spratly Islands. Before the China has robbed some coral reefs from Vietnam, they did not have own any islands in the Spratly Islands.
China always claims they had owned the islands long ago, so where were they before 1988?

The massacre above would be nothing strange if we know that the Chinese army has killed tens of thousands of Chinese students in only one night, who also did not have any weapons....

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

We can't really blame them for hating us...Vietnamese are forgottern people of China...our emperors had not properly took care of them beside having 3000 concubines in the imperial palace...otherwise we wont have any issue and we could have count them on our side.

take a look of the below picture, how differencialte the southern chinese people to these Vietnamese

Hát bội opera

The southern Chinese origin were BaiYue (Bách Việt), meaning "hundreds of Viets tribes". BaiYue was collection of tribes Viets ethnic, but were invaded and assimilated by Han Chinese from the north. Only 2 of the "hundreds" of Viets tribal are Âu Việt và Lạc Việt resisted successfully, they were Vietnamese present today.
So, we can say that the southern Chinese origin who BaiYue, and some provinces such as Quảng Đông (Guangdong), Guangxi (Quảng Tây), formerly of Vietnam's territory.
So nothing strange if they have some cultural similarities.

Also see here:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/172515-china-riles-vietnam-island-cruise-4.html#post2812583

 

[EastSea]

The southern Chinese origin were BaiYue (Bách Việt), meaning "hundreds of Viets tribes". BaiYue was collection of tribes Viets ethnic, but were invaded and assimilated by Han Chinese from the north. Only 2 of the "hundreds" of Viets tribal are Âu Việt và Lạc Việt resisted successfully, they were Vietnamese present today.
So, we can say that the southern Chinese origin who BaiYue, and some provinces such as Quảng Đông (Guangdong), Guangxi (Quảng Tây), formerly of Vietnam's territory.
So nothing strange if they have some cultural similarities.

Also see here:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/172515-china-riles-vietnam-island-cruise-4.html#post2812583

Young boys Vietnamese.

Minority young boys Chinese living in Vietnam in the past. Two ethnicities Viet (Nan Yue) and Catonese (dong Yue) is slighly different.

 

[Beast]

It should be called collective massacres are more accurate. Cannot say it was a "navy battle" because Vietnam side had only transport ships and construction troops, who did not have any weapons. Meanwhile China side used warships with heavy weapons. I think they were more difficult to fire if at that time Vietnam had warships there.

It is the clearest evidence to prove the illegality of China's claims on the Spratly Islands. Before the China has robbed some coral reefs from Vietnam, they did not have own any islands in the Spratly Islands.
China always claims they had owned the islands long ago, so where were they before 1988?

The massacre above would be nothing strange if we know that the Chinese army has killed tens of thousands of Chinese students in only one night, who also did not have any weapons....

Clearly , you are high on drugs. No weapon and they dare to go ashore and challenge Chinese troops there? Who are you trying to kid? Yr Vietnam troops no match for Chinese and then you try to paint a different story, they are construction troops with no even a Ak-47 with them? HAHAHA....

If you want to lie, please rephase and make a more convincing one. It will only make Vietnam looks bad. And its already look bad enough....

The southern Chinese origin were BaiYue (Bách Việt), meaning "hundreds of Viets tribes". BaiYue was collection of tribes Viets ethnic, but were invaded and assimilated by Han Chinese from the north. Only 2 of the "hundreds" of Viets tribal are Âu Việt và Lạc Việt resisted successfully, they were Vietnamese present today.
So, we can say that the southern Chinese origin who BaiYue, and some provinces such as Quảng Đông (Guangdong), Guangxi (Quảng Tây), formerly of Vietnam's territory.
So nothing strange if they have some cultural similarities.

Also see here:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/172515-china-riles-vietnam-island-cruise-4.html#post2812583

Another terrible lie.. Guangdong and Guanxi are clearly under the ancient China's dynasty where Vietnam identity not even exist so how can you claim both province is under former Vietnam???

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

Clearly , you are high on drugs. No weapon and they dare to go ashore and challenge Chinese troops there? Who are you trying to kid? Yr Vietnam troops no match for Chinese and then you try to paint a different story, they are construction troops with no even a Ak-47 with them? HAHAHA....

If you want to lie, please rephase and make a more convincing one. It will only make Vietnam looks bad. And its already look bad enough....

At that time Vietnam had only some small transport ships, with construction soldiers. They were transporting materials to coral reefs to build the gantry house, like in the photo below. At that time, china used warships to kill them, the soldiers without weapons along with their small transport ships.
In the World, only the chinese proud that they killed civilians in Vietnam in 1979 and the Vietnamese transports with construction troops in 1988, which if in other countries, they will feel ashamed and want to hide it.
That's why today most of the young Vietnamese hate China.

Another terrible lie.. Guangdong and Guanxi are clearly under the ancient China's dynasty where Vietnam identity not even exist so how can you claim both province is under former Vietnam???

Quảng Đông, Quảng Tây (Guangdong, Guangxi) and Northern Vietnam are lands previously under the Nam Việt (Nan Yue), Việt Nam today. But Quang Dong, Quang Tay (Guangdong, Guangxi) were conquered by the Han chinese.
So Quang Dong, Quang Tay (Guangdong, Guangxi) formerly were the territory of Vietnam.
There are many historical documents about this. You can self-study.

Vietnamese History: A Chronological Outline | Asia for Educators | Columbia University