Drone swarms vs conventional arms: China’s military debate (Nikkei's FT - 2017-08-25)
As is Washington. “Clearly the US and China are in some sort of weird swarm race,” says Paul Scharre, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security who writes on military robotics. “A swarm with 10 more individual drones isn’t necessarily better. What matters are the things you can’t see. It’s the algorithms that govern the swarm behaviour.”
China insists it is now on an even footing with the US on drones, with CETC saying it has “made some major breakthroughs”. But experts warn that mature swarm technology is still a long way off and will require developing the necessary technology to boost communication between the drones, methods to keep them in the air longer and a modern military capable of deploying the swarms effectively.
It is hard to assess the claim that China’s technology is superior to that of the US, says Mr Scharre. The US military operates about 7,000 drones. Analysts say there could be at least 1,300 currently in operation between the Chinese army and air force, although none have been used in offensive missions.
https://www.ft.com/content/302fc14a-66ef-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614
SORRY, link is under PAYWALL!
I didn't realize the article is put behind the Paywall, at that late hour I posted it I could access the whole article
but now it's gone and I keep no copy
-----------------------------------------------
Drone swarms China’s Way to Win Future War (2017-08-27)
Financial Times says in its recent article “Drone swarm vs conventional arms: China’s military debate” that there is debate in China’s military whether
China shall focus on expensive conventional arms such as aircraft carriers, stealth warplanes, etc. OR
pursue a new generation of weapons with revolutionary strategy that uses large number of cheap arms coordinated with advanced software to outdo the above-mentioned very expensive conventional arms.
The article specifically discusses the new system of drone swarm. It says that there is debate in Chinese military whether to stick to the old strategy of developing conventional expensive weapons or switch to new systems of much cheaper drone swarm.
China has a boom in developing, producing and exporting drones in which China’s private enterprises play a very important role as drones are both military and civilian.
The article says Chinese President Xi Jinping created a
Military-Civil Integration Development Commission with himself as head. This commission enables China’s private enterprises to play an increasingly important role in weapon development as they develop technology for both civilian and military application.
That shows that Xi, as the leader with centralized power approves the new strategy; therefore the debate is but the writer of the article’s invention.
The article says that swarm technology can reverse the trend of the deployment of fewer but more advanced and expensive weapon platforms. It regards drone swarm as the next generation of weapon that may outdo sophisticated technology systems by the sheer numbers of autonomous drones.
The article quotes
Elsa Kania, an independent researcher on Chinese military affair, as saying,
“The People’s Liberation Army anticipates that swarm intelligence and swarming tactics could serve as an asymmetric means to target high-value US weapons platforms.”
True enough on June 11
China Electronics Technology Group, a state-owned high-tech company,
showcases its world’s largest swarm of 119 drones controlled by software of artificial intelligence, breaking US-held record.
As China is now the world’s factory able to produce large quantity of low-cost goods, the article believes that the tactical trend of using lots of robots to outdo sophisticated weapons clearly favors China.
It says, “
Another trend favouring China is that next-generation defence technologies are more and more indistinguishable from the civilian technologies mass produced in cities like Shenzhen.”
“
A third trend favouring China is that software has become more important than hardware.”
It seems that the article believes that China will surpass the US militarily if robot warfare prevails in the future.
Commenting on Financial Times’ article, full text of which can be found at
https://www.ft.com/content/302fc14a-66ef-11e7-8526-7b38dcaef614.