What's new

Chinese troops incursions in Indian controlled territories - News updates and Discussions

PLAAF have 1500+ total fighter jets and PLAN have some 400 total fighters . leave aside rest of bombers tankers AWACS and special missions . they are light year ahead of india in drones comparing china and india is now a disgrace of china . their military power is matching now usa
Bro, believe me when I say this. China's inventory is anyone's guess and it's normally under published than what they want the others to believe.
:pakistan::china::cheers:

chakkaveer chakra
What is this, bud?

I think you are inspired from some Mullah, and you want to press button to nukes on India..
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

India don't need any sugar daddy like our neighbor, we can fight and sustain a war with China or any other country.

On previous post you said, CCP do not have guts,it has to fight 3 powerful nation,
now you are saying you can fight alone, i think you woke up from dream

if you are dreaming for Russia and US to support you,
Reality is that, Russia and US only sell weapons to India, you can call them business/trade partner,
Russia is China ally lol..

And US do not make friends, it only use countries for its interest, like it use Saddam
 
On previous post you said, CCP do not have guts,it has to fight 3 powerful nation,
now you are saying you can fight alone, i think you woke up from dream

if you are dreaming for Russia and US to support you,
Reality is that, Russia and US only sell weapons to India, you can call them business/trade partner,
Russia is China ally lol..

And US do not make friends, it only use countries for its interest, like it use Saddam

My statement.
India don't need any sugar daddy like our neighbor, we can fight and sustain a war with China or any other country.

it is not a dream but a simple REALITY,any failed/rouge nations accept it or not
 
I thought Pakistanis don't trust Indian sources. Everyday lots of threads are being opened on news by 'lying, thieving, Indian sources'. I think some folks need to make up their mind.

PS: I trust many Indian sources.
 
My statement.
......we can fight and sustain a war with China or any other country.

it is not a dream but a simple REALITY,any failed/rouge nations accept it or not

Your War with China in Past:


Your Super Power country with Failed Nation:

{Watch it at 2:00-2:14}
 
Last edited:
You are the most coward, shameless nation on earth the humanity has ever seen. The Chinese are in your territory but you can't do anything and playing it down right from your top military general to Govt officials because you know Chinese will kick in your *** if try to do something. Chinese keep taking territories by salami silicing and you keep surrendering all the time. You can only bark if the opponent is Nepal.

Then you keep repeating lies to hide your utter humiliation like pak giving territory to China which was never the case, then 71 where Pak was fighting 1000 miles against its 6 times bigger enemy.

You don't have anything other than 1000 years of slavery, insult, cowardliness which you are known for.
India does not recognise the unilateral decision by Pakistan to cede Kashmiri territory to China, the area ceded should be returned back by China.

Similarly Pakistan does not recognise Indian annexation of Kashmir on 5th Aug, This is natural.

As for your 1000 year gibberish, Arabs did successfully invade Indian subcontinent and the most impacted regions are obviously present day Pakistan and Bangladesh, it’s just natural for conquering nations to impose its culture and religion in those who are subjugated.

Similarly high percentage of Christians in Goa is due to Portuguese rule in the region.

Also, Aryan invasion of India gave rise to Hinduism here. So your argument of 1000 year rule has no standing as the biggest proof is you yourselfs.

If you remove every conqueror then you are left with aboriginal population very similar to the Andamanese and Nicobar indigenous people.
 
That is a small BORDER SKIRMISH we annexed entire Sikkim in 1967, China tried but we teach them a strong lesson.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_clashes

You are sharing same article which we discussed already yesterday, i think..
Fake Victory Declared by Indian on Indian Source, no neutral source

On wikipedia page:
Casualties
According to Chinese reports, the number of soldiers killed were 32 on the Chinese side and 65 on the Indian side in Nathu La incident; and 36 Indian soldiers and an 'unknown' number of Chinese were killed in the Cho La incident.[7]

On the other hand, the Indian Defence Ministry reported: 88 killed and 163 wounded on the Indian side, while 340 killed and 450 wounded on the Chinese side, during the two incidents.[5][6]

Indian Claim: Indian Dead 88, Chinese Dead 340
Chinese Claim: Indian Dead 65, Chinese Dead 32
How India can be declared winner on Indian claim ? Then China is also winner on Chinese Claim

No Neutral Reliable Source, And Wikipedia pages can be created and edited by any one... And you are sharing again and again sh*tty article

ExWq4PB.png
 
You are sharing same article which we discussed already yesterday, i think..
Fake Victory Declared by Indian on Indian Source, no neutral source

On wikipedia page:
Casualties
According to Chinese reports, the number of soldiers killed were 32 on the Chinese side and 65 on the Indian side in Nathu La incident; and 36 Indian soldiers and an 'unknown' number of Chinese were killed in the Cho La incident.[7]

On the other hand, the Indian Defence Ministry reported: 88 killed and 163 wounded on the Indian side, while 340 killed and 450 wounded on the Chinese side, during the two incidents.[5][6]

Indian Claim: Indian Dead 88, Chinese Dead 340
Chinese Claim: Indian Dead 65, Chinese Dead 32
How India can be declared winner on Indian claim ? Then China is also winner on Chinese Claim

No Neutral Reliable Source, And Wikipedia pages can be created and edited by any one... And you are sharing again and again sh*tty article

ExWq4PB.png

Small correction we took-over Sikkim in 1973 and it became one of Indian state.

U may call it loss!! :rofl::rofl::rofl:

quick-redeployment-measures-in-place-by-army-in-doklam.jpg
 
India does not recognise the unilateral decision by Pakistan to cede Kashmiri territory to China, the area ceded should be returned back by China.

Similarly Pakistan does not recognise Indian annexation of Kashmir on 5th Aug, This is natural.

As for your 1000 year gibberish, Arabs did successfully invade Indian subcontinent and the most impacted regions are obviously present day Pakistan and Bangladesh, it’s just natural for conquering nations to impose its culture and religion in those who are subjugated.

Similarly high percentage of Christians in Goa is due to Portuguese rule in the region.

Also, Aryan invasion of India gave rise to Hinduism here. So your argument of 1000 year rule has no standing as the biggest proof is you yourselfs.

If you remove every conqueror then you are left with aboriginal population very similar to the Andamanese and Nicobar indigenous people.

Pakistan did NOT give any inch of territory to China what Pak holds no matter how many times you keep parroting the lies. Pakistan just accepted the Chinese claims of Shaksgam valley which was always in Chinese custody. In return Pak gets hundreds of sq miles of land from Chinese custody.

You lost Aksi Chin to China. Then you keep losing territories to China by Salami Slicing tactics. China comes across LAC, pitch tens and then make it no mans land be it Daulat Beg, Galwan River valley, Pangong Tso lake.

We were the ones who ruled from Kabul to Bengal for 1000 years.

You don't have anything significant in your history in which you can find solace. Out of utter humiliation, you glorify small achievements and when these small achievements are not available then you create them by yourself. 26/27 Feb is a living proof i.e. 300 terrorist killed, launching pads destroyed, F16 shot down etc. while the whole world saw who was humiliated.
 
Small correction we took-over Sikkim in 1973 and it became one of Indian state.

U may call it loss!! :rofl::rofl::rofl:

You Indian need more edits on Wikipedia for Propaganda
Read 2nd Paragraph, 2nd line


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikkim


The Kingdom of Sikkim was founded by the Namgyal dynasty in the 17th century. It was ruled by a Buddhist priest-king known as the Chogyal. It became a princely state of British India in 1890. After 1947, Sikkim continued its protectorate status with the Republic of India. It enjoyed the highest literacy rate and per capita income among Himalayan states. In 1973, anti-royalist riots took place in front of the Chogyal's palace. In 1975, the monarchy was deposed by the people. A referendum in 1975 led to Sikkim joining India as its 22nd state.[9]

Also Read here:

Recent history[edit]
In 2000, the seventeenth Karmapa, Urgyen Trinley Dorje, who had been confirmed by the Dalai Lama and accepted as a tulku by the Chinese government, escaped from Tibet, seeking to return to the Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim. Chinese officials were in a quandary on this issue, as any protests to India would mean an explicit endorsement of India's governance of Sikkim, which China still recognised as an independent state occupied by India. The Chinese government eventually recognised Sikkim as an Indian state in 2003, on the condition that India officially recognise Tibet as a part of China;[44] New Delhi had originally accepted Tibet as a part of China in 1953 during the government of Jawaharlal Nehru.[45] The 2003 agreement led to a thaw in Sino-Indian relations,[46] and on 6 July 2006, the Sikkimese Himalayan pass of Nathu La was opened to cross-border trade, becoming the first open border between India and China.[47] The pass, which had previously been closed since the 1962 Sino-Indian War, was an offshoot of the ancient Silk Road.[47]
 
Arabs did successfully invade Indian subcontinent and the most impacted regions are obviously present day Pakistan and Bangladesh, it’s just natural for conquering nations to impose its culture and religion in those who are subjugated.
WTF man! What are you talking about? I have nothing to do in this thread, but your above comment is pretty ill informed and low IQ stuff.

Arabs never conquered Bengal/Bangladesh. Just open the world map and see where Bangladesh is located. They cant do it without conquering most of india, which they didnt.

You should research about Islamisation of Bengal, then try to open your mouth in an international forum.
 
India says China has invaded and installed "80 Tamboo" in India.

 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom