What's new

Chinese Missiles News & Discussions

China test fires 'carrier killer' ballistic missile amid tensions with India, USA
Amid growing tensions with India and the United States of America, the Chinese have test-fired a ballistic missile which is being tipped as 'carrier killer'. On Monday, People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) announced that it had test-fired two ballistic missiles during recent drill, a short-range and an intermediate-range missile.

Published on: August 06, 2020 8:36 IST

capture-1596682419.jpg

Image Source : PLA OFFICIAL WEBSITE

Amid growing tensions with India and the United States of America, the Chinese have test-fired a ballistic missile which is being tipped as 'carrier killer'. On Monday, People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) announced that it had test-fired two ballistic missiles during recent drill, a short-range and an intermediate-range missile.

"We are in a highly alert state for combat, to ensure our actions are prompt and precise,” Liu Yang, the commander of the brigade that carried out the tests, was quoted as saying in a story on PLA news site 81.cn


The IRBM launched by the Chinese Army has a range of 2,500 miles and is being tipped as an 'aircraft carried killer', a potential threat to the USS Nimitz and other American Navy vessels in the region.

The drill was to test how 1quickly PLARF soldiers could respond to an incoming nuclear attack. In the video, uploaded to the PLA website, they are seen charging towards the mobile missile launchers. The report however did not confirm when the drill took place.

This comes after US Air Force's Global Strike Command test-fired the LGM-30 minuteman lll ICBM which has a range of 4,200 miles, just after midnight on August 4.

“The Minuteman III is 50 years old, and continued test launches are essential in ensuring its reliability until the 2030s when the Ground Base Strategic Deterrent is fully in place. Most importantly, this visible message of national security serves to assure our allies and dissuade potential aggressors,” 576th Flight Test Squadron commander Col. Omar Colbert said in the release.

China's relations with both US and India have been on a downward trend in the last few months. India has taken significant steps to counter Chinese involvement in the country by banning a number of Chinese apps.

US has meanwhile extended its support to India against the expansionist policy of China.

US Congressmen Eliot Engel and Michael McCaul wrote to External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar last night. "US-India relationship is all the more important as India faces aggression from China along your shared border, that is part of Chinese government's pattern of unlawful and belligerent territorial aggression across Indi-Pacific," the letter read.

"The United States will remain steadfast in support of India’s efforts to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. We acknowledge ongoing serious security and counterterrorism concerns in region and look forward to work with your govt to address these while upholding our shared commitments to democratic values on which our nations’ bond was built," the Congressmen futher added.

https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/wo...ndia-tension-icbm-india-china-standoff-639906
I can't understand why this seemingly INDIAN media use the Imperial System instead of Metric System.

Do Indian people use the Imperial System in their daily lives?

We, the Asian, don't measure in miles, we use kilometers. We don't use Imperial System in day-to-day life, we use Metric System!
 
. .
I would caution using the parade count though. Can we be certain they are not mockups? Moreover, even just because the DF-41 has a MIRV payload of 10 warheads does not mean it will carry 10 warheads. More likely, at least half would be used as penetration decoys.

I can't remember where I saw it but the link was on CJDBY pointing to a different website, with following comments underneath. Those people actually estimated the number more conservatively than you thought. DF-41 was estimated as carrying 6 warheads of 65kt TNT based on the sizes they got from the pictures or video clips of the parade. They also noticed the latest launch vehicle number of a typical brigade for ICBMs is 18.

I think I should make it more clear. They actually estimated the sizes and numbers based on what were visible at the parade and combined them with results from satellite photos of those newly built PLARF brigades or bases. Then they multiplied up number of launch vehicles and number of brigades.

Of course experienced PLARF watchers all know that those brigades or bases visible to satellites are actually training hubs. The real deployment could mostly be in or within support range of a huge system called Underground Great Walls. However numbers of those bases and vehicles can still give you some rough idea about the deployment scale of the missiles with a range for targets in the US.
 
.
A very good generalization from Indian source over the global situation of the past couples of decades. If we can win easily and naturally, why we have to fight?

"China had been winning without fighting, while the US was fighting without winning."
The impact on the global order of China’s rise will be visible over the next generation
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ise-will-be-visible-over-the-next-generation/
 
. . . .
It really is. Being able to launch attacks on carriers beyond the first island chain or attack carriers in the SCS from the Gobi desert is a remarkable capability.
Are we sure they are launching the rockets from the Gobi desert to the SCS for exercise? If this was the case, they would have launched a notice (e.g. NOTAM).
 
.
Are we sure they are launching the rockets from the Gobi desert to the SCS for exercise? If this was the case, they would have launched a notice (e.g. NOTAM).
I'm not talking about this launch, but what capability the DF-26 gives the PLA. Being able to attack American carriers in the SCS from deep in the Chinese hinterland away from any possibility of a preemptive strike or boost interception is significant.
 
. . . . . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom