What's new

Chinese media slams the West’s hypocrisy in CharlieHebdo reaction

As an Australian, you people need China most of all. Hilarious that you don't even see the irony in your statements. :rofl:



Did you kill innocent women and children shopping in a market? Did you kill innocent people lining up to buy train tickets? If so, you deserve to die. But if not, why are you comparing yourself to terrorists who attack non-combatants? :crazy:



I figured Indians would understand. After all, you guys elected an anti-Muslim murderer as your president and are proud of it. I wonder how many more pogroms Modi will lead now that he rules the whole country? Jai Hind! :rofl:
Avoid trolling if you could. People who call modi murderer call NATO-Canada as murderer too. Nothing has been proved in court.
 
TL;DR So, a country which jails anyone against govt, supports freedom of speech and it is not hypocritical?
 
Another fine example of Western rubbishing the real news and twisting facts. typical cheap western move. Al Jazeera was bought over by saudi and its now uses as a lackey news agency to serve American.

Has China really put a ban on fasting? – The Express Tribune Blog

The fact is muslim in China is far better than those in US and Europe.


Al Jazeera is practically run by the CIA according to a reliable Turkish journalist and experienced Middle East expert (he is of Syrian descent but has a Turkish wife and lives in Turkey). He was almost in all war zones in the ME in the last 30 years, from Iraq-Iran to Armenia-Azerbaidjan and beyond.

Netherlands to ban the burka - Telegraph

France's burqa ban upheld by human rights court | World news | theguardian.com

Somehow only China is single out while other exercise those moves by west is consider righteous?


The West supported Chechen terrorism against the Russians, and they will definitely do the same to China, if given the slightest chance. They are probably funding Uyghur terror, but I don't know much about that issue.

They are foes of the west, so yeah, this is akin to the periodic brainfarts by Putin or the hilarious ramblings by North Korea.


Oh look, another Western bootlicker ... how cute.
 
The west may be hypocritical but then again everyone is when it suits them, its human nature..atleast we arent as fucked up as the Chinese government, we dont outright ban things we dont like and persecute peoples beliefs, banning hijabs in muslim cities etc and blocking media we dont want our people to see. Muslims on a whole live a good life in most Western countries, I cant imagine the same can be said about muslims living in a communist country or the Christianity obsessed Russia.

Al Jazeera is practically run by the CIA according to a reliable Turkish journalist and experienced Middle East expert (he is of Syrian descent but has a Turkish wife and lives in Turkey). He was almost in all war zones in the ME in the last 30 years, from Iraq-Iran to Armenia-Azerbaidjan and beyond.




The West supported Chechen terrorism against the Russians, and they will definitely do the same to China, if given the slightest chance. They are probably funding Uyghur terror, but I don't know much about that issue.




Oh look, another Western bootlicker ... how cute.

Exactly, as you have admitted you know **** all about any of the issues. Your information comes from the internet, just like conspiracy theorists who tout their theories, they have no real knowledge/professional aspect of what they talk about, they read something on the internet just like you and spout it off as truth. Can you even deny that? do you really know anything that you have personally discovered or do you just read dubious websites and forum talk and then pass it off as information that you are somehow privy to. Your a forum dweller and that usually means your outside world contact is limited to your local area, you probably go onto that strange sputnik website full of western outcasts who like to talk about how the jews did everything.

In other words, if you have nothing to say, say nothing at all. Its strange but there are many of you on the internet, probably due to a lack of friends or nobody to talk your nonsense to because its baseless.
 
Oh look, another Western bootlicker ... how cute.

Ooh, your powers of deduction are exceptional. I can't allow you to waste them here when there are so many crimes going unsolved at this very moment. Go, go for the good of the city.
 
Chinese media slams the West’s hypocrisy in CharlieHebdo reaction

Chinese newspapers have condemned the attack on the offices of a satirical magazine in Paris while pointing out the hypocrisy and “double-standards” of Western countries’ reaction to terror attacks.

China’s Communist party-run Global Times on Friday said condemnations of terror attacks in Russia and China are not as forthcoming from Western countries as opposed to the quick and unified reactions to the attack on Charlie Hebdo in France.

“The world is always unified in its response to terrorist attacks that happened in the West, but when it’s the West’s turn to react to such attacks in countries like China and Russia, they often beat about the bush,” said the editorial on Friday.

“Even after China officially determines their terrorist nature, Western mainstream media puts quotation marks when describing these bloody assaults as “terrorist,” saying that it is a claim of the Chinese government,” it added.

On Wednesday, three masked gunmen stormed the Paris offices of the satirical magazine that has become notorious for its caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad and killed 12 people.
On social media sites like Twitter, people showed their support online using the #JeSuisCharlie hashtag.
US President Barack Obama said he strongly condemned the “horrific shooting” while speaking in French, US Secretary of State John Kerry pledged US solidarity with France,”Tous les Américains se tiennent à leurs côtés (All Americans stand beside France)”.

In stark contrast, a Chinese envoy to the UN in Geneva last year had to express Beijing’s dissatisfaction over the international community’s sluggish response in treating Xinjiang violence as “terrorism”.
Meanwhile, the editorial in the Chinese state-run Global Times on Friday questioned the western narrative on the attack as revolving around “press freedom”.

“We notice that many Western leaders and mainstream media outlets highlighted their support for press freedom when commenting on the incident. This remains open to question. Press freedom lies as part of the West’s political and social systems and is a core value. But in these globalized times, when their acts contradict with the core values of other societies, the West should have the awareness to ease conflicts, instead of heightening them in accordance with its own values in a zero-sum manner,” said the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist party.

“As the West holds absolute dominance in global opinion, non-Western societies can scarcely get their disagreements heard by the world. The West has to consciously control its use of “soft power” that can verbally abuse those it doesn’t favor,” it added.

Global Times
, a newspaper owned by China’s Communist Party, is known for its strident editorials.
The editorial on Friday said while “what Charlie Hebdo has published is not completely defendable”, there can not be any justification for a violent attack.

“Terrorist attacks are absolutely inexcusable, but meanwhile, it would be wise not to intensify the sensitive elements against the complicated backgrounds. Condemning terrorism doesn’t necessarily mean supporting controversial cartoons,” it said.
Editorials of state-owned media in China, like Global Times, generally reflects the Communist Party viewpoint.

Charlie Hebdo
, a left-leaning French satirical weekly, had, since 2006, been sued, threatened and firebombed for its sporadic publication of cartoons mocking the Muslim prophet Muhammad.
Charlie Hebdo publisher Stephane Charbonnier was among those killed in Wednesday’s attack.
In an interview to Los Angeles Times in 2013, Charbonnier said, “The message is: There’s no taboo subject in France”.

The publisher said he hoped the public will get so used to the drawings that little or no violence will result, or that Islam will be “trivialized” like any other religion.

“So let’s talk about Islam the way we talk about everything else,” he said.

Chinese media slams the West’s hypocrisy in CharlieHebdo reaction | The BRICS Post
Very much required, some common sense prevails after all at a time when the West is mindlessly supporting lampooning, ridiculing and deliberately provoking Muslims.
Here is what Rupert Murdoch said:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150110_185923.jpg
    IMG_20150110_185923.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 28
Don't bring up left/right wing if you can't differentiate between the two and then get all defensive when you're called out on it. To be honest, I don't really care about your experiences or whatever. If you're OK with killing people holding sticks or cell phones that's none of my business. It's your own burden to bear.

lol, dude, if i should refrain f4om making comment about left or right, then probably you should say the same about you, you should refrain from making lost regrading military, war and battle knowledge, cuz it seems to me, you have none. Watching some blog and reading some books does not equate youto be knowledgable in Military, Battle and warfare. In fact, its far from it.

We are here to learn, you can rebutt me if you think i am wrong, but tell someone should not post in that field if that person does not have knowledge on that? Then who do you think you are?

Then you also have to know you are the one attacking me by asking me Was I actually lived in the States, i am simply telling you or asking you why you can deduce where do I lived from my political knowledge? If you think this is defensive, well, i probably got nothing to say. And if you have to say, then you will probably notice my Ingles is not really good too, should you also lass that judgment based on that?

Plus, seems like you are the one annoyed by my post, or else why quote me in the first place?

If you dont care why i did and what i say, why quote?
 
Last edited:
Avoid trolling if you could. People who call modi murderer call NATO-Canada as murderer too. Nothing has been proved in court.

You should tell your countrymen that since I'm only responding to what they wrote.

TL;DR So, a country which jails anyone against govt, supports freedom of speech and it is not hypocritical?

Your comment doesn't make any sense. Instead of TL;DR, you probably should have read the article instead of randomly posting. I know the literacy rate in India is pretty low but c'mon. Give it a try. Read if you're able.
 
Last edited:
You should tell your countrymen that since I'm only responding to what they wrote.



Your comment doesn't make any sense. Instead of TL;DR, you probably should have read the article instead of randomly posting. I know the literacy rate in India is pretty low but c'mon. Give it a try. Read if you're able.
Your comment makes so much sense. Canada must be proud to have you....
 
Global Times doesn't represent Chinese media,we have many other newspapers,they all side with French people
And death to Islamists

STFU, those liberal stooges in China don't represent us at all.

The Chinese people condemn the terrorist attack, but we also condemn the western hypocrisy.
 
STFU, those liberal stooges in China don't represent us at all.

The Chinese people condemn the terrorist attack, but we also condemn the western hypocrisy.
You can believe in the religion you want to believe,I also can make fun of religions of I want to make fun of,we are a secular society,religions are just not important in our society,even I favour Buddhism,but if one make fun of Buddhism,I also believe he has the right to make fun of Buddhism
 
You can believe in the religion you want to believe,I also can make fun of religions of I want to make fun of,we are a secular society,religions are just not important in our society,even I favour Buddhism,but if one make fun of Buddhism,I also believe he has the right to make fun of Buddhism
STFU, those liberal stooges in China don't represent us at all.

The Chinese people condemn the terrorist attack, but we also condemn the western hypocrisy.

Western newspapers and Westerners believe deserve we are to blame Xinjiang terror attack, if I wrote that the United States deserved 9/11 and the Boston Bombing or the UK deserved it's soldier getting beheaded or France deserves this attack then I would be considered a terrorist sympathizer, Westerners do that for Uighur terrorists. Chinese papers may express sympathy for them but Westerners they don't offer sympathy to us.

In a sense they got what was coming to them a large radical growing Muslim population in Europe, you can expect more of these. They support terrorism when it fits their interest, hypocrites of the highest degree.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom