Chinese interest in Gandhian teachings growing

[Koovie]

Can you tell me a little about the economic part ? I understand the Marxist one fairly well , I think but dont have a clue about what Mr.Gandhi said or taught ...

In short: He advocated that India should be completely self sufficient. This means that each town or village should sustain itself. Furthermore, he rejected competition, large industries, etc because they were inhuman, bad etc etc and the usual BS.

Even Nehrus semi socialism was 14542354353 times better than this thinking.

 

[shuttler]

The rising number of riots against CCP show just that



Countinue worshipping your CCP masters-I can understand your respect for them.You need their approval to open your mouth,have kidsrofl and they pay you (50 cents per post)-They have the power to do anything and you are at their mercy...

haha....pathetic.

You are just pitiful. I am writing on my free will in my spare time while watching tv and listening to my soft hi-fi music playing in the background

I sure have more respect for my government comparing to how bad your government is.

And it is funny to see so many delusional indians are chest thumping their indian democracy which is synonymous to dire bottom line governance

 

[gslv mk3]

You are just pitiful. I am writing on my free will in my spare time while watching tv and listening to my soft hi-fi music soothing in the background I am sure have more respect for my government comparing to how bad your government is.

And it is funny to see so many delusional indians are chest thumping their indian democracy which is synomous to dire bottom line governance

Yeah,continue showing your respect,otherwise you'd be

 

[Srinivas]

Gandhian teachings ? - guys its useless. Follow your art of war. That is much more useful.

You will be surprised to see even in some Chinese movies non violence , forgiving your enemy are depicted which closely resembles Gandhian principles.

 

[shuttler]

Yeah,continue showing your respect,otherwise you'd be

of course.

We have our own beautiful and versatile language. we learn little English as a whole in our education system. We are going stronger everyday using English as our second or third language because of our more frequent contact with foreigners outside. This is just an obvious example of how we have walked the miles on our own - haha So what!
.
Credit to our thinking and the opportunities provided by our government

 

[gslv mk3]

of course.

We have our own beautiful and versatile language. we learn little English as a whole in our education system. We are going stronger everyday using English as our second or third language because of our more frequent contact with foreigners outside. This is just an obvious example of how we have walked the miles on our own - haha So what!
.
Credit to our thinking and the opportunities provided by our government

useless rants,I know you did understand what I said.

 

[scorpionx]

of course.

We have our own beautiful and versatile language. we learn little English as a whole in our education system. We are going stronger everyday using English as our second or third language because of our more frequent contact with foreigners outside. This is just an obvious example of how we have walked the miles on our own - haha So what!
.
Credit to our thinking and the opportunities provided by our government

The good old "Frog in the well" story.Philosophers,scholars from both side of the border are visiting their neighbors for 2000 years,learning history,cultures from each other.And you still leaving in the stone ages

 

[shuttler]

useless rants,I know you did understand what I said.

it is you who have nothing to offer

 

[Srinivas]

Completely wrong Ghandiji is an aggressor than even Bhagat singh. What Ghandiji did was channeled his aggression and pointed it towards British.
He also said when you are weak and not in a situation to fight the method of non violence is the best one.

People like Bhagat Singh and Subhash chandra bose tried to do it in a violent way, what it will achieve against the British?

They will be eventually captured or their family members will suffer because of British persecution since at that time India is not in a position to fight British even a Guerilla warfare.

In contrast to both the men who chose violent ways Ghandhi stood infront of the British and lead the movement which even terrified the British. Every move of Ghandi went like a cold chill in British administration.

I don't think even Subhash chandra bose can do that with his army.

India which now we are seeing is capable and can be aggressive so no need to follow Ghandhi principles exactly.

Gandism was never been our Ideology ... its somethings which makes Us & our people feel inferior to our enemy ... Like ChaaChaa Nehru once said my soldiers can defend their country even with bamboo sticks ... & at the end what did he get ... defeat 1962 ...

our ideology should be of Bhagat Singh , Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj , Guru Gobind Singh & Veer Savarkar ... with the Courage of the Rajputs , valor of the Marathas , Fearlessness of the Gourkas ... not this Non-violence &hit called Gandism ...

It has never been our culture ... to beg in front of our enemy for mercy ... in our culture accepting death is much more glorious then suffering dishonour from the hands of enemy ...

Remember what Lord Sri Krishna said in Geeta ... Never forgive your enemy who has come with a sword in his Hand with the aim of capturing your Motherland...

i dont follow this Gandi Vandi...

 

[shuttler]

The good old "Frog in the well" story.Philosophers,scholars from both side of the border are visiting their neighbors for 2000 years,learning history,cultures from each other.And you still leaving in the stone ages

yes the 'frog in the well' indians and still quoting Tianmen Sq as example while your colossal failure of looking into your massive woes

We dont need indian culture. again I repeat: sell it to your friends like VN, JPN, USA, AUS, ISR, RUS ...

dont even mention about buddism and kungfu. The former you have masscred it, The latter is our effort of creation, improvisation and proliferation

 

[scorpionx]

yes the 'frog in the well' indians and still quoting Tianmen Sq as example while your colossal failure of looking into your massive woes

We dont need indian culture. again I repeat: sell it to your friends like VN, JPN, USA, AUS, ISR, RUS ...

dont even mention about buddism and kungfu. The former you have masscred it, The latter is our effort of creation, improvisation and proliferation

We did not massacre Buddhists.Read history,the buddhists massacred themselves. And I love Kunfu Panda,nice movie

 

[Srinivas]

Hindutvas fantasies and fallacies

What is there to laugh my friend, Hinduism is the one where you find a separate clan of warriors,

A fox came and kissed Indian rulers from the west for trade and then took over India using cunningness do not mean that this land do not have warriors. Or since some Islamic rulers who used unconventional techniques like hit and run to gain foot hold in India do not mean India has no warriors.

The same West and Islamic rulers under which India was exploited were under pathetic conditions and the conditions of them are deteriorating fast.

 

[ChinaToday]

One question for you
ever heard of Tiannamen square riots of 1989??

ever heard of golden temple ?

You will be surprised to see even in some Chinese movies non violence , forgiving your enemy are depicted which closely resembles Gandhian principles.

Gandhian principles allow gay marriage?

 

[shuttler]

We did not massacre Buddhists.Read history,the buddhists massacred themselves. And I love Kunfu Panda,nice movie

you are driving Buddhism into nothing but a 1% statistics in your religious demographics. All buddhists have taken their solace in Myanmar, S Lanka, Thailand, most East Asia including Greater China

 

[KRAIT]

You are asking explanations from someone who got banned for using racial slur against Pakistanis here. I remember well, debunking many of his preconceived Indo-phobic ritualistic believes with proper source, he never had anything intellectually logical to comeback, except some silly verbal diarrhea.

Actually I was respectfully bashing him as it was evident he doesn't know about what Gandhism is at first place.