What's new

Chinese Government Does Not Tolerate Muslim Jihad, Executes 13 Terrorists

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good riddance.

Cleaned the thread up from Indian terrorist sympathizers and trolls, banned a couple of Indian terrorist sympathizers and trolls.

Thank you sir, for removing the Indian terrorist sympathizers like @sarthak from this thread. :cheers:

Whats up Brother; long time no see ? :)

On Topic: Good....very good; a strong handed approach is needed to tackle terrorism whether based on religious, ethnic or linguistic lines !

Though I wonder if recruiting Counter-Terrorist Units from within these same Muslim majority areas and perhaps bringing Hui or other more integrated Muslims from the other parts of China as Imam or Community leaders, may accelerate this process of de-radicalization and aid in fighting against the menace of terrorism !

What do you think @Chinese-Dragon @Hu Songshan ?

It's a good idea. Although Uyghur-Hui conflicts are also pretty bad.

Hui are the largest Muslim minority group in China, but they are ethnically/culturally almost identical to Han Chinese (apart from the religion) so the Uyghur extremists hate them as well.
 
.
Thank you sir, for removing the Indian terrorist sympathizers like @sarthak from this thread. :cheers:



It's a good idea. Although Uyghur-Hui conflicts are also pretty bad.

Hui are the largest Muslim minority group in China, but they are ethnically/culturally almost identical to Han Chinese (apart from the religion) so the Uyghur extremists hate them as well.


ahahahah........good point, As i said these scums who call themselves muslim(more like they are foolish unreasonable extremists, who have nothing to do with other moderate/sane muslims) will kill/execute/behead/stab anyone who goes against their view of extremist jihad/islam, even their fellow 'muslim brothers'. These are people who have been brainwashed/indoctrinated and cant be saved, they deeply believe in what they are doing is right, so as far as you stand up against them/and speak out against their point of view, then you will immediately be regarded as an infidel(just like they regard even fellow muslim Shias, and other mulsim minorities groups in syria/iraq who dont hold their extremists wahabist view of islam as infidels/devils.lol). I cant say it enough, these scums dont give a shit whether you are white,black, muslim,arab, han, hindus etc, as far as you dont agree with their view, then you will be immdiately be laballed with all kinds of infidel names and beheaded/targeted. They even target innocent civilians randomly who have nothing to do with them or religion at all.:disagree: Thats why im for goverments world wide to not to killt them when they strike, arrest them first and torture them tuntil they beg for death, then give it to them. :butcher:Killing them on sight is too easy on them. make them suffer as well(just like they do with their victims which they stab/behead).
 
.
Nope i mean the muslim extremists/some radical Imams here who brainwash/indoctrinate our muslim youths about imposing foolish Shariah laws in their neighbourhoods/streets. I live here, so i know more about it than you. There are streets here where they try and impose their islamic religious shariah laws, teling our girls not to wear revealing skirts, trousers, people not to drink alcohol, etc. Who they hell do they think they are to come and impose their laws in a foreign country who has welcomed them with open arms? They shouldn't take that for granted. Afterall, can a christian/buddhists ever come to a middle eastern/muslim country and try this shit/impose his religion in the middle east? He will be immediately executed in a second. :agree: If they want to live in medieval times, they should go back to theiur countries of origins and impose such laws, not in ours. Lets see how their native mulsim country will treat them when they go back and try the same Shariah shit.:lol:. So why will these radical muslim extremists expect us to stay calm and accept it when they themselves will never accept for a christsian/budhhist etc to do that in their own country? :disagree: We shouldnt either. Thats why im for our government deporting anybody who tries to impose such laws in our country and ban them for life.

Everything you say is right but, what I am saying is, it is not the full story.

Let's examine your points:
- no go ghettos: ethnic ghettos, where outsiders fear to enter, have been around in every country for centuries. They are nothing new to Muslims.

- sharia law: whatever Muslims want sharia law only want it for themselves, not all of Britain. Such self-imposed laws are using existing precedent of Jewish and Catholic communities using such religious laws. Again, this is nothing new to Muslims.

- extremists: the -- literally -- handful of extremists who make noise are impotent and only serve as useful idiots for the media and government. The media loves the sensationalism which these guys provide, and they, in turn, come up with more and more extreme idiocies to get media attention. The government loves these guys because it can beat its chest about upholding 'freedom of speech' while using these idiots to enact draconian laws to circumvent these exact same freedoms.

The only danger that these extremists pose is to Muslim communities themselves and nobody would be more happy than Muslims if these extremists were jailed or deported. However, as I explained above, the government will not do that, and the wider Muslim community will continue to be held hostage to their antics.

Not just that, they try to intimidate others into following their religion by preaching in streets/gyms/schools..

Every religion preaches in many places.

The government should at least make it illegally for girls under 16 to wear so that when she reaches an age which she can decide whether she wants to wear it or not.

By your logic, the government should ban circumcision. It should ban Catholic schools and Jewish seminaries, so parents can't send their children there. It should ban any religious education to children under 16.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
Global anti-terror agenda should not miss out Xinjiang
By Wen Dao

With the rise of the Islamic State (IS), terrorism continues to wreak havoc on global peace and stability. By sweeping across almost half of Iraq, causing atrocities, and revealing its ambition to establish its own state, the extremist IS has apparently opened up a new vision for its fellow terrorist groups, including its "frenemy" Al Qaeda.

In the first issue of Resurgence, an English-language magazine recently founded by Al Qaeda Central Command, there is a strong focus on the Asia-Pacific region, with an article entitled "10 Facts about East Turkistan." Besides distortions of the history and status quo of China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and instigating hatred between the region's ethnic groups, the point of the article is directly articulated, implying that Al Qaeda is looking at the bigger picture.

Al Qaeda's trajectory reveals some new characteristics of global terrorism, among which the convergence of different terrorist groups and the pursuit of a caliphate are prominent.

The old and fragmented pattern is being changed. Terrorist groups are no longer limited to their own independent activities but are trying to find consensus amid competition. More offshoots of Al Qaeda have pledged allegiance to the IS, whom they believe will lead them to this strong caliphate.

Despite internal conflicts, the convergence of these terrorist groups is posing the greatest threat to world stability.

The victory of the IS in Iraq has clearly boosted the terror group's confidence.

In late June, it released a map of its visionary caliphate, whose vast land stretches from Spain to Xinjiang.

This sudden focus on China means Al Qaeda, by taking advantage of the rise of global terrorism and the withdrawal of NATO in Afghanistan, is attempting to expand its influence. It will pose an unprecedented challenge to Xinjiang's security as the Chinese government and security forces will not only face domestic separatists and terrorists, but also must fight against the encroachment of global terrorism.

Under general circumstances, Xinjiang's prominence in the anti-terrorist undertaking will be highlighted and the area will be irreversibly included in this global war on terror.

Xinjiang's security and stability will not only rely on the effectiveness of domestic government policies or the strength of regional anti-terrorist efforts, but be deeply influenced by the global scenarios in this regard.

Beijing's iron fist to fight terrorism should be extended beyond its borders, which will help it secure the stability of its westernmost land. International cooperation is playing a bigger role in anti-terrorism, and China must enhance its efforts as a part of it.
 
.
Every religion preaches in many places.



By your logic, the government should ban circumcision. It should ban Catholic schools and Jewish seminaries, so parents can't send their children there. It should ban any religious education to children under 16.
I believe every child should choose his/her religion only when he/she reaches an age in which she can logically have a choice independently otherwise it's actually a violation of freedom of religion.
 
.
I believe every child should choose his/her religion only when he/she reaches an age in which she can logically have a choice independently otherwise it's actually a violation of freedom of religion.

I agree with you completely bro. You couldnt be more correct. My wife told me the same thing, she doesnt want our son to start any religion until he is grown up enough to make up his own choice. I was surprised by this, since her parents her catholics and true believers and she does go to church as well(well when she finds time.lol), so i thought she will also want our son to follow her religion, but no she decided it was better to allow him choose one by himself when he is mature/grown up enough to be able to mkae his own decisions. I agree completely with this, people shouldnt force their kids to follow their reliogious views/religion, be it christians, Buddhists, Hindus, or muslims etc. If not, its violation of religion as you said and should be condemned.:agree:
 
.
Obviously,the best way to stop terrorism is to improve the regional development situation.There won't be much terrorism if people are all busy improving their living condition.I tend to trust the influence of a good secular life.
But,It's difficult to develop the economy without a stable society.SO,it's really easy to get trap into the endless loop of worse economy and worse security situation.Forgive me,I think Pakistan also have the same problem.
 
. .
More extreme Terrorists was executed,less innocent people will be killed.

 
.
take a stand.. which is the right perspective?
depends on the interest of the particular country. If you take chinese interests obviously they are terrorist but for india and pakistan xinjiang doesn't matter much.
if you take kashmiri separatist for instance who are doing the same - they are terrorist for india but freedom fighter for pakistan and when indian compares these two incidents and trying to show the hypocrisy of pakistan than he gets a warning for trolling :D
 
.
if you pick the sword of Jihad and are caught the penalty should be death every time.

I dont know, But so many people dont know the meaning of Jihad.
I mean, if your literally struggling to teach someone something even tho their too stupid to understand.

Then it is Jihad your doing. lel.
(Arabic stuff, idk)




I COULD BE WRONG YOU KNOW.
but idc.
 
.
Good Job - Muslims of China should integrate with main stream and ripe the fruit of economic rise of China - Pockets of their govt. is full with money, they should stop listening to Mullahs and ask govt. for development and industrialization in their region.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom