" Chinese Flankers are a unique family of aircraft ! " - reconfirmed

[The enlightened]

The dumb one reinvents the wheel while the smart one just improves on it.

Does the smart one also claim that he invented the wheel, or that it just looks like the original wheel but is a new product???????

 

[tvsram1992]

Great article.

These 85 IQ Indians laughing at china is like Africans laughing at china. No wonder India is such a backward 4th world dump.
Indians can't even make their own guns and bullets and laughing at china, you can't make this sh*t up.

They just cannot handle china's success of our domestic industry.

Indians don't have the IQ to invent nor do they have the IQ to reverse engineer, yet they are the first one to laugh at others, just sums up their 4th world country up perfectly. If they want to know why they were colonized for 300 years and why they never progress. The reaction to this article and the jealousy of china's magnificent turbofan engine WS-10 proves why India is such a very backward country, no matter how much they grow, they will always be backward until they change that mentality.
Other countries will progress faster than Indians.

Boy if India thinks they will stop china's domestic industries, both civilian and military, by laughing at us, it is they who will be kissing our Chinese a$$e$ in the 21st century. China is determined to become self sufficient in every industry.

One thing is for sure, with these developments no one will want to mess with china.

we have balls where as you have IQ's

 

[The enlightened]

Hey guys can someone create new threads about these 3 latest Chinese developments. I'm posting on my phone, it's difficult for me to do a good job posting them.
It's important we show our success.

GIS developers foray into social apps_Insight--China Economic Net

China's 4G standard targeting 30% global mkt share in 10yrs_Insight--China Economic Net

China makes headway in mass memory system - People's Daily Online



India hasn't developed sh*t, your entire software industry is foreign companies, nothing Indians developed.
India is too backward to developed.

Yes we can't develop nothing.
Now that you are sitting on the DF-41 road and mobile[ as seen in your location entry, are you also going to rain India with the megatons.

 

[DF-41 ICBM]

Oh ya i too can posts indigenous software hardware developed by us...
The issue is we developed that ourselves..
Not by stealing....
And i have already set ur a$$ on fire... Dip it in SCS...

India hasn't developed sh*t, your entire software industry is foreign companies, nothing Indians developed.
India is too backward to developed.

 

[Hafizzz]

Whatever you say or produce to prove your point, but the truth is that it is Clone of SU27 with little bit of chinese gadgets, just to satisfy her self proclaimed indigenous claim.

LOL. AT least China can duplicate and even surpass the original copy whereas India can't even duplicate anything but yet Indians claim that everything they have or produce are "indigenous".

 

[DF-41 ICBM]

We should also post how our mighty WS-10 turbofan engine is already installed in the J-11B.

Let the haters feel the a$$burrrrrrrrrn

Muahahahahahahahahahahhahaha

 

[Hafizzz]

We should also post how our mighty WS-10 turbofan engine is already installed in the J-11B.

Let the haters feel the a$$burrrrrrrrrn

Muahahahahahahahahahahhahaha

China is now moving beyond the point of acquiring foreign equipment and is focused solely on developing her own. India has to resort to buy while China simply reverse engineers and copies. This means while India can only get a certain amount of equipment at a time, China can produce as many as she wants. In this sense, China's military advances are already ahead of India's.

Once again I will use the SSN example. China already has 4 operational SSNs built in Chinese shipyards while India's indigenous SSN is still a prototype. India is still looking to Russia to buy a nuclear powered submarine.

 

[The enlightened]

China is now moving beyond the point of acquiring foreign equipment and is focused solely on developing her own. India has to resort to buy while China simply reverse engineers and copies. This means while India can only get a certain amount of equipment at a time, China can produce as many as she wants. In this sense, China's military advances are already ahead of India's.

Once again I will use the SSN example. China already has 4 operational SSNs built in Chinese shipyards while India's indigenous SSN is still a prototype. India is still looking to Russia to buy a nuclear powered submarine.

Yes. That's a big advantage they have and in a prolonged war, this would serve them pretty well. But we still have reasons to doubt the quality of reverse engineered products despite what Knop says.

 

[Hafizzz]

Yes. That's a big advantage they have and in a prolonged war, this would serve them pretty well. But we still have reasons to doubt the quality of reverse engineered products despite what Knop says.

Really ?

Russian Ground Troop Says Chinese Arms Better Than Russian Arms ~ ASIAN DEFENCE NEWS

 

[The enlightened]

Really ?

Russian Ground Troop Says Chinese Arms Better Than Russian Arms ~ ASIAN DEFENCE NEWS

So suddenly, Russian news sources are believable now?
H(cough)y(cough)p(cough)o(cough)c(cough)r(cough)i(cough)t(cough)e(cough)s
Now ask me how Asian Defence News is Russian. Common ask me.

 

[zer_0]

The dumb one reinvents the wheel while the smart one just improves on it.

Next time if china copies Porsche,BMW design keep that in mind

 

[Beast]

Next time if china copies Porsche,BMW design keep that in mind

BBC NEWS | Business | Kalashnikov upset by Indian 'copy'

The Russian company behind the world's most infamous rifle, the Kalashnikov AK-47, is up in arms over an alleged copy made by India's state weapons maker.
Representatives from Izhmash, the gun's original manufacturer, discovered what they see as an Indian rip-off of the AK-47 at an arms fair in Delhi.

But India's Ordnance Factory Board says the weapon is different enough to count as a distinct design.

AK-47 copies are produced in dozens of countries, but only a handful have formally licensed it.

The row blew up, Izhmash representatives told Agence France Presse news agency, when the man who invented the AK-47 in World War II visited OFB's pavilion at the arms fair and saw what he thought was a copy of his brainchild.

"I don't see any permission being given to India to manufacture the rifle" and sell it for export, said Izhmash's Andrei Vishnyakov.

Russia is India's largest supplier of weapons - although not of AK-47s.

'Threat'

The new weapon has yet to appear on OFB's website, which advertises products ranging from pistols to main battle tanks.

Still, OFB staff were keen to deny the accusation.

"The cocking mechanism is different, the lever has been changed and the barrel is chrome-plated," OFB gun designer Mohammad Ali told AFP.

For general manager MK Garg, Izhmash's complaint rests on a false premise.

"The Russian Kalashnikov was made in 1947 and no patent in the armament industry is valid beyond 30 years," he said.

"It seems they are threatened by our product."

Who owns what?

Izhmash has run into copyright problems before.

Russian companies spent two years disputing who controlled rights to the AK-47 before Izhmash finally won sole control in 2002.

But the millions of copies sold in arms bazaars over the world - and appearing on at least one national flag (Mozambique's) as well - have yet to produce much in the way of royalties.

 

[OrionHunter]

What kinda bullsh!t is the OP trying to convey? Whether Chinese planes are 'cloned' or 'derivatives', the fact remains that these are basically a Russian design concept. Period!

So don't clutch at straws trying to prove the non existent Chinese 'expertise' in concept design! The Chinese are copycats and that's the bottom line!

Cheers!

 

[Beast]

What kinda bullsh!t is the OP trying to convey? Whether Chinese planes are 'cloned' or 'derivatives', the fact remains that these are basically a Russian design concept. Period!

So don't clutch at straws trying to prove the non existent Chinese 'expertise' in concept design! The Chinese are copycats and that's the bottom line!

Cheers!

Indian equally guilty.. Look above the post

 

[DF-41 ICBM]

What kinda bullsh!t is the OP trying to convey? Whether Chinese planes are 'cloned' or 'derivatives', the fact remains that these are basically a Russian design concept. Period!

So don't clutch at straws trying to prove the non existent Chinese 'expertise' in concept design! The Chinese are copycats and that's the bottom line!

Cheers!

So the did Japanese copy the car. Is Toyota a copy of European cars?
Everyone copies.

You copy and you build on that to improve it. Therefore you have a starting base.
China used the Russian airframe and installed everything else domestically overtime.
That is a domestic aircraft.

China can now produce this without getting approval from anyone or sell the fighters to anyone.

Yes the airframe is russian design, everything else is domestic Chinese technology.

We have our own domestic industry, now we reverse engineered it, found out all the things we needed to find out and now we don't need them anymore.
We are now becoming self sufficient in many areas.

India has zero domestic industry, you need significant talent to reverse engineer, if you can't then you must innovate from scratch wasting R&D. India cannot innovate and it don't have the ability to reverse engineer. What's the result of it.....IMPORT EVERYTHING.

Trust me, if India knew how to reverse engineer, they would do it in an instant, the problem is, reverse engineering is not easy, you need expertise and know how to improve upon it.

First you imitate then you innovate.
Imitation is the first step to innovation.
You learn from imitation to build your own industry.