Chinese Airforce Activities in South China Sea Revealed [Translated]

[Viva_Viet]

omg god I'm speechless```this clearly shows my assumption of how ignorant and naive vietnamese are very correct, there is no single jet fighter has a combat radius over 3000KM, unless assisted by alians`and the funny part is that you dont even know the difference between combat radius and ferry range (3000km is ferry range)``lol``yet keeping putting not even amerture but nonsencial stuffs on PDF a defence forum`

and you are talking about modify a 100+km range missile to over 800+km``lol, can vietnam even make a reliable assault rifle? let alone modifying a missile defence system which is way out of you country's technological capability```it took US 15 years to upgrade SM missile to SM-6 which has over 200KM and you believe with backward vietnam can do better than that? lol again another vivid evidence of vietcon's systematic brainwashing project`
and during vn war, the russians and chinese helped you to modify SAMs not vietcons`

and do you even read post`? in modern air combat (not your stone age viet dog fight), to shoot down a plane is a collective work of a holistic system of intellegence, radar detection, radar guidance, command,controll, BVRAAM and electronic warfare, vietcon has none of those subsystems``but only few poorly maintained Su-27/30s``if you dont know where the ennemies are how are you going to shoot them down? like the way vietcon did in vn war spraying AKs in the jungle hoped hit some poor unlucky guys?

Bro, to shoot dow your Oil tanker aircraft, our pilots need one way ticket only like Kamikaze, so that will be 3,000 km , after that, parachute do the Job

in modern air combat (not your stone age viet dog fight), to shoot down a plane is a collective work of a holistic system of intellegence, radar detection, radar guidance, command,controll, BVRAAM and electronic warfare, vietcon has none of those subsystems``

so, how much Russia offer for those system bro ??We can affort to buy them, but may be we don't need, coz you air force is inexperience,and US. may offer those system also, we don't need a hammer to kill a mosquito

the russians and chinese helped you to modify SAMs not vietcons`

can you send me the link , bro ??

 

[Rechoice]

read my post above then you will get an idea why vn could shoot down B-52 in 70s```unless you still believe modern combat still condcuting the way more than 40 years ago``maybe in vn's case.

I read, but your comment is foolish. You don't know what happen in fact we shoot down B52. Following theory we may lost in war with US. I remind you that in 1972, US used "Electronic war", it mean active electronic noise shall control all radar receiver screen, no seen target, no permit switch on radiator system, they could immediately fire back with air-earth missile when detect radar signal ...But we win.
No talking in case you do not know what is this.

 

[mhb56]

I shall remind you, that the whole 1972 Vietnam war was an experiment practice and learning experience. One of them, was the testing of our weather modification technologies on board of our airplane by our air force in one your village in the jungle. I presume that the PRC might already have such capability now, Ex: the current flood in Beijing and other parts in China. So Vietnam, your current conventional force are useless against them so let have a deal between two cousins. If, they lash out this beast on you, it will be uncontrollable , we already saw that with their current disaster recently seen last week in order to fight the water problem they have. Remember of Operation Popeye!

 

[Viva_Viet]

I shall remind you, that the whole 1972 Vietnam war was an experiment practice and learning experience. One of them, was the testing of our weather modification technologies on board of our airplane by our air force in one your village in the jungle. I presume that the PRC might already have such capability now, Ex: the current flood in Beijing and other parts in China. So Vietnam, your current conventional force are useless against them so let have a deal between two cousins. If, they lash out this beast on you, it will be uncontrollable , we already saw that with their current disaster recently seen last week in order to fight the water problem they have.

We having deal now, but they can not violate our EEZ.But are you trully American ??Coz your gov.'s helping us now, like Uranium enrichment, nuclear electricity .v.v.If US. think: it's usless to help VN, US. would run away like 1975 already

 

[mhb56]

I like you guys sense of humor, you are funny!

 

[rcrmj]

Bro, to shoot dow your Oil tanker aircraft, our pilots need one way ticket only like Kamikaze, so that will be 3,000 km , after that, parachute do the Job



so, how much Russia offer for those system bro ??We can affort to buy them, but may be we don't need, coz you air force is inexperience,and US. may offer those system also, we don't need a hammer to kill a mosquito
can you send me the link , bro ??

it costs not only tens billions U.S dollars but even vietnam bought them you dont have the technological know-how to operate it``this was what PLA faced in early 80s it took us 30 years to learn, develop, build and operate those systems. but in vn, you dont even have a concept of what is information centric warfare`

 

[Viva_Viet]

it costs not only tens billions U.S dollars but even vietnam bought them you dont have the technological know-how to operate it``this was what PLA faced in early 80s it took us 30 years to learn, develop, build and operate those systems. but in vn, you dont even have a concept of what is information centric warfare`

it costs not only tens billions U.S dollars ??Oh, maybe we've bought it long time , or we've sent some men to Russia to stay there and lean for long time already.Or we may invent it our self after sending men to Russia.

Your men are diffrent with us,we learn combat skil and technology very fast. You need 30 years, but mabe we need 10years only.See Us.pilots during Vn war, they have lots of trainning hours, and our pilots is less trainning hours than them so much, but we still can shot them dow .

 

[rcrmj]

I read, but your comment is foolish. You don't know what happen in fact we shoot down B52. Following theory we may lost in war with US. I remind you that in 1972, US used "Electronic war", it mean active electronic noise shall control all radar receiver screen, no seen target, no permit switch on radiator system, they could immediately fire back with air-earth missile when detect radar signal ...But we win.
No talking in case you do not know what is this.

read my post carefully again``if you think factuals about fighter jet performance listed in my post are foolish and how about your funny friend of saying S-300 shooting 800+km targets and su-30 has 3000km combat radius``lol

in 1972 there wasnt a systematic concept of electronic warfare, those conter measure deployed by USAAF to deal with vietnam radar were merely to solve some imminent problems, but it did not develop it into a extreemly effective and power systems nowadays major military powers have.

accroding to your funny theory, there is no need to develop faster computers as those computers in 70s can do the 'same' job the modern computers do``

during 10 years of the conflict, there were more than 1000+ flights missions carried out by B52, most of the time they all within vn air defence range, if by that you counldnt shoot down some you'd put russian and chinese assistance into shames.

just to answer my simple questions, does vn have anything that can fly, detect, guide and shoot 500+km targets? dont give me those vn can upgrade this and vn did that in 72 irrelevant nonsenses`

 

[Viva_Viet]

I like you guys sense of humor, you are funny!

See, If US let CHina conquer VietNam, Us. will lose the influence in ASEAN countries,coz the Hoa(Chinese ethnic living in ASEAN) are controlling ASEAN's economy now, such as Singapore, ThalLand, Malaysia, so they won't fight against China.your allies Australia will be in danger and Us.-Australia may need one more Battle of Coral Sea

That the main reason why US. is helping us now , help us and help your allies Australia also.

 

[Rechoice]

read my post carefully again``if you think factuals about fighter jet performance listed in my post are foolish and how about your funny friend of saying S-300 shooting 800+km targets and su-30 has 3000km combat radius``lol

in 1972 there wasnt a systematic concept of electronic warfare, those conter measure deployed by USAAF to deal with vietnam radar were merely to solve some imminent problems, but it did not develop it into a extreemly effective and power systems nowadays major military powers have.

accroding to your funny theory, there is no need to develop faster computers as those computers in 70s can do the 'same' job the modern computers do``

during 10 years of the conflict, there were more than 1000+ flights missions carried out by B52, most of the time they all within vn air defence range, if by that you counldnt shoot down some you'd put russian and chinese assistance into shames.

just to answer my simple questions, does vn have anything that can fly, detect, guide and shoot 500+km targets? dont give me those vn can upgrade this and vn did that in 72 irrelevant nonsenses`

Hi hi.
You read may be so much propaganda from your media. For S-300 pls discuss with may friend.
One thing I could advise you that, in case of China could not control electronic wave in all region, please give up dream to make war adventurer in East Sea of Vietnam.
Second, if you have family relatives joint to war, please tell them that shall do as best as possibly to get away from any kind if missiles made in China, be course the 的可靠性 realisbility is very poor, easy lost out from the control. May exploded on base

 

[Viva_Viet]

read my post carefully again``if you think factuals about fighter jet performance listed in my post are foolish and how about your funny friend of saying S-300 shooting 800+km targets and su-30 has 3000km combat radius``lol

in 1972 there wasnt a systematic concept of electronic warfare, those conter measure deployed by USAAF to deal with vietnam radar were merely to solve some imminent problems, but it did not develop it into a extreemly effective and power systems nowadays major military powers have.

accroding to your funny theory, there is no need to develop faster computers as those computers in 70s can do the 'same' job the modern computers do``

during 10 years of the conflict, there were more than 1000+ flights missions carried out by B52, most of the time they all within vn air defence range, if by that you counldnt shoot down some you'd put russian and chinese assistance into shames.

just to answer my simple questions, does vn have anything that can fly, detect, guide and shoot 500+km targets? dont give me those vn can upgrade this and vn did that in 72 irrelevant nonsenses`

just to answer my simple questions, does vn have anything that can fly, detect, guide and shoot 500+km targets?

So, how about Su-30 Mk2 with Kamikaze tactic , bro ??

For the tens billions U.S dollars system, mabe we had it already, it's not so expensive and we can send men to learn in USSR (Russia now) long time already, bro

 

[rcrmj]

it costs not only tens billions U.S dollars ??Oh, maybe we've bought it long time , or we've sent some men to Russia to stay there and lean for long time already.Or we may invent it our self after sending men to Russia.

Your men are diffrent with us,we learn combat skil and technology very fast. You need 30 years, but mabe we need 10years only.See Us.pilots during Vn war, they have lots of trainning hours, and our pilots is less trainning hours than them so much, but we still can shot them dow .

your entire military budget is merely 2billion``you lot realy know how to mental masturbate````learn fast? another obscured vietcon propaganda?

if a very big if vn learns things fast then you wouldnt be using russia/chinese rifles and ammunitions, buying small boats from other countrys, and your military hardware and philosophy is in absolute WWII standard```

and our pilots is less trainning hours than them so much, but we still can shot them dow

any more of these craps from your kindergarten comic books? during 10 years of operation US carried out more than 5 million sorties which suffered 1700+ casualties and 70% of them where done by AAA and 20% by technical faliure` not your government glorified artificial reports

a retard with a gun can shoot a highly trained SEAL dead``

again you people have to drag irrelevant vn war into every single arguments while neglecting that fact that the world is changing with ever fast pace in modern combats`

 

[rcrmj]

Hi hi.
You read may be so much propaganda from your media. For S-300 pls discuss with may friend.
One thing I could advise you that, in case of China could not control electronic wave in all region, please give up dream to make war adventurer in Ease Sea of Vietnam.
Second, if you have family relatives joint to war, please tell them that shall do as best as possibly to get away from any kind if missiles made in China, be course the 的可靠性 realisbility is very poor, easy lost out from the control. May exploded on base

if you have very basic knowledge about modern air combat and C4SI system u'd keep your ignorant mouth shut to keep from embarrassing youself.

and my other advice for you to read posts in context, your funny friend put those hidious claims like su-30 combat radius is 3000km and s-300 can shoot down 800km targets, i was merely responding to those two points``but i guess i defies your delusions created by your vietcon media or whatever method they employ to brainwash you lot``

in terms of chinese realiability you dont need to worry about that, we are the top 5 arm exporters in the world, even your twisted government bought and buying lots from us to help you shoot down some US crafts.

 

[rcrmj]

So, how about Su-30 Mk2 with Kamikaze tactic , bro ??

For the tens billions U.S dollars system, mabe we had it already, it's not so expensive and we can send men to learn in USSR (Russia now) long time already, bro

your pilots are going to be headless flies without your land based antique radars' guidance`show me any source vietnam has anything that can support a long range interception mission? the fact is none`

 

[mhb56]

I heard that Taiwan has better C4ISR than yours, is it true?