Chinese Air Force (PLAAF) News & Discussions

[LKJ86]

 

[LKJ86]

Seriously, China is still using F-7? please don't to put our pilot's life as target practice for enemies.

Mainly for training and 哭穷.

 

[Figaro]

Seriously, China is still using F-7? please don't to put our pilot's life as target practice for enemies.

To be fair, I highly doubt China would ever put the F-7 in the frontlines during wartime. At best, they will be used for low tier interception missions ... the PLAAF knows they are essentially metal coffins against the F-35 or even F-16.

 

[LKJ86]

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

哭穷.

lol ok

 

[khanasifm]

Seriously, China is still using F-7? please don't to put our pilot's life as target practice for enemies.

Still have quite a few check orbit, last time the number of f7 and a5s were over 300-400 range assuming 6 -8 brigades eq aircraft each having about 50 Ac

F-8 are also there pretty much older gen

Even j-6 showing up may be in UVA and other roles

I think adding j-10 and j11/15/16 series get them ~500-600 or so so majority it plaaf still need to replace quite a few older gen

http://www.scramble.nl/orbats

 

[Grandy]

The curious case of the reappearing Dark Sword/Anjian

twitter/5uQd7WZPb3

Images of a remotely piloted fighter jet designed by Chinese aircraft makers caused immediate paranoia on Tuesday at Business Insider, which dubbed the aircraft a “nightmare for the US.”

The Dark Sword jet brings several threats to the table, BI reported. For example, the aircraft has supersonic flight performance, as indicated by "F-22-style vertical stabilizers," air combat expert Justin Bronk of British think tank Royal United Services told the outlet.

The US Navy initiated an unmanned combat aircraft program in the early 2000s, but it was eventually terminated. Northrop Grumman's X-47B aircraft demonstrator conducted flight tests in 2013 from an aircraft carrier, but the Navy decided to develop a drone to perform aerial refueling missions for carrier operations instead. That program, now known as the MQ-25A Stingray, aims to put drone tankers onto carriers by the mid-2020s.

In addition to its speed, Dark Sword could give China an edge by relieving Beijing from having to train so many pilots, Bronk said, especially if the fighter-style drones can be mass produced. Large numbers of Dark Swords could "at the very least soak up missiles from US fighters," he said. "If you can produce lots of them, quantity has a quality of its own."

"At the very best," the supersonic plane would become a viable fighter aircraft in its own right, Bronk noted, in which case the US could be confronting a massive force of remotely piloted supersonic aircraft that might even exhibit greater maneuverability than manned adversaries since there is no pilot physically inside the plane whose vitals must be protected, BI reports. Piloted aircraft are limited in their maneuverability by g-forces exerted on the pilots inside, as too sharp a turn can force blood out of the pilot's head and cause loss of consciousness.

Nevertheless, the expert said that since "we only see what the Chinese want us to see," the plane's specifications on paper don't imply its actual fighting capabilities.

 

[Title1234]

Seriously, China is still using F-7? please don't to put our pilot's life as target practice for enemies.

Example LAO border just uses J7 is enough , no need for J10.lao royal airforce has no fighter aircraft.

 

[LKJ86]

 

[Deino]

View attachment 478841 View attachment 478842 View attachment 478843

Where is this base?

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Example LAO border just uses J7 is enough , no need for J10.lao royal airforce has no fighter aircraft.

Laos is not even an enemy, why we need J7 at their border?

 

[LKJ86]

 

[Pepsi Cola]

Laos is not even an enemy, why we need J7 at their border?

Politics change all the time.

 

[Deino]

View attachment 478992

Again ... please where is this?

 

[Daniel808]

Again ... please where is this?

China