What's new

China's War Plans For India

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really don't think you want to compare education in china and india. you will be very, very disappointed. not just primary schooling but higher education as well.

also, Geely bought Volvo completely, Dongfeng and Nissan are equal partners, CSSC built the F22P sailing in the arabian sea right now and CSIC builds civilian ships like the oil tankers. We are the largest shipbuilder in the world right now, surpassing South Korea. Sinopec and Petrochina are of course, oil companies with investments across the globe.
 
.
I really don't think you want to compare education in china and india. you will be very, very disappointed. not just primary schooling but higher education as well.

also, Geely bought Volvo completely, Dongfeng and Nissan are equal partners, CSSC built the F22P sailing in the arabian sea right now and CSIC builds civilian ships like the oil tankers. We are the largest shipbuilder in the world right now, surpassing South Korea. Sinopec and Petrochina are of course, oil companies with investments across the globe.

Why you have a problem in us comparing ourselves with you, I really dont understand. As I said earlier, we compare because we want to grow, not to drag you down. You are ahead of us, accepted. That's precisely why we compare us with you. Its a race man, you have the pole position, you need to maintain the lead and we need to close the gap. And in doing so, we will be moving ahead-both of us.

I know these companies my dear (esp Sinopec and CNOOC/Petrochina, coz our own OVL faces a lot of competetion while bidding for oil fields from these two). AFAIK (and I may be wrong) Geely bought volvo's Truck & Commercial vehicle business, not the passenger cars business. Nevertheless, its true that China is progressing in terms of building global brand leaders, but its a slow starter here. In this caser atleast, India is quite close to China (I mean, in terms of global high profile mergers & acquisitions by Indegenous companies).
 
.
Why you have a problem in us comparing ourselves with you, I really dont understand. As I said earlier, we compare because we want to grow, not to drag you down. You are ahead of us, accepted. That's precisely why we compare us with you. Its a race man, you have the pole position, you need to maintain the lead and we need to close the gap. And in doing so, we will be moving ahead-both of us.

I know these companies my dear (esp Sinopec and CNOOC/Petrochina, coz our own OVL faces a lot of competetion while bidding for oil fields from these two). AFAIK (and I may be wrong) Geely bought volvo's Truck & Commercial vehicle business, not the passenger cars business. Nevertheless, its true that China is progressing in terms of building global brand leaders, but its a slow starter here. In this caser atleast, India is quite close to China (I mean, in terms of global high profile mergers & acquisitions by Indegenous companies).

Stop replying and this will end!
 
.
Stop replying and this will end!

So that's all you have to say? C'mon man, u r supposed to be representing a would be greatest superpower. My unsolicited advise - start thinking like one. Grow up dear.
 
.
So that's all you have to say? C'mon man, u r supposed to be representing a would be greatest superpower. My unsolicited advise - start thinking like one. Grow up dear.

china never claim to want to be a superpower unlike some-other countries that cant stop comparing its self even though it always loses.
 
.
in any war, CJ-10s, DF-21s and HN-3s launched from H-6 bombers based in inner mongolia would paralyze indian command and control within hours.

WS-2 can bombard new delhi from askai chin.

JH-7's, J-8s and Su-30s equipped with antiradiation missiles escorted by J-10s and J-11s under the command of KJ-2000s will annihilate all indian SAM sites and destroy most of the indian air force on the ground.

after air supremacy is achieved over northern india, 500,000 soldiers from chengdu and lanzhou military regions backed by 2000 tanks can roll right into the ganges plain and take control of new delhi. when the indian government surrenders, it can have all its territory back except for the lands stolen from us in the past, and it will merely pay a small fine on the tune of several trillion dollars, to be paid for in oil, gold and natural resources, for all damage caused by its aggression in the past.

Wow I really impressed with your over confidence. Do you really think that it is that much easy to take India? OK let's talk technically, China has advantage in only border area due to its geography and military build up along Chinese side.

To attack on India, China can easily mobilize its troops but this advantage wouldn't last long due to Indian technological and air superiority. This would pose a serious threat to Chinese forces.

Now about missiles then India is actively developing its indigenous missile defense shield and in 2012 India would be able to defend itself from any missile threat. So chinese missiles wouldn't be able to paralyze Indian command.

And it's not easy to destroy SAMs by aerial attack because as you come to destroy SAM you'll also be in SAM's range and would be shot down by missiles. Bad idea man. Akash, SPYDAR, Patriot missile system would neutralize any aerial threat from China. Chinese air force would be destroyed during this attempt.

And finally when 500000 chinese troops attack along with 2000 modern tank you wouldn't retain a single inch of Indian territory for long time. IAF can easily get control over indian sky and would target chinese troops, supplies, transport systems etc. During that time India would be prepared for an massive and world's largest counter strike to give proper answer to chinese that india is not a burger which can be taken by kids.

How about this man?
 
.
This dumb thread is a prime example of Indian spamming our board with their superiority yy statement. Please close it mod.
 
Last edited:
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom