China's role in Indian occupied North East .

[Kai Liu]

I checked the O-page 23 map. It's mostly related to the South Chinese haplogroups. From the YFULL site there are two of Tripura that share a common ancestor with other Chinese about 3300 years ago. It's not strange that Manipur Meitei has a genetic link with Southern Chinese.

Break your Union with India try to regain your independence. The best wishes from China!

No one is gonna doubt if anybody say this old gentleman is Chinese:

 

[halupridol]

Apparently a manipuri, a meitei
@swnjo sounds legit, , just like the old apatani one

 

[rott]

.


Imo, almost all them can pass as chinese, chinese vary in looks so much .

The people you posted are cute but definitely not a dominant representative community like meetei or naga or mizo. Those are likely more minor community at best.NE have lots of different communities like china.
Dominant community like meetei is actually famous for their nose shape( even known as "roman nose" people among NE communities) and possess more refined facial structure in whole NE.Meetei have better nose and more structured face than typical east asian too.

meetei nose samples ;

We can instantly identify that those people aren't dominant community meetei the nose and skin tone are big giveaways,and they are quite unlikely to be even naga or mizo the other two major community in NE.You seem quite unaware of the unique race stock.
Look at our grandpas ,even they all have roman nose

I am sorry bro, but they look nothing like Han Chinese. They are very pretty no doubt. But they look like Thai to me.

These girls are Han Chinese if you can see the difference.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

No one has mentioned this, but it seems the best course of events would be regime change in Bangladesh.

Not a question of if, but when Bangladesh shifts towards China and Pakistan, it would make taking the chicken neck very easy for China and assuring NE states along with Bihar and Assam secede from India.

Some members are adamant about Burma. This intolerable state is oppressing all of its minorities, worst of all Rohingya, but also Shan and Chin who are related to chinese. Why give Burma another minority to persecute? They will get what is coming to them.

 

[Leishangthem]

I am sorry bro, but they look nothing like Han Chinese. They are very pretty no doubt. But they look like Thai to me.

I never said they look like anyone else .
I simply pointed out the distinct "NOSE SET" in major NE ethnicity like meetei.

btw,I've also seen enough han in taiwan,their looks vary from person to person by a lot. I've also met Koreans in DELHI,they were quite dark compared to avg NE people in skin tone bc India is scorching hot and you get tanned in minutes.
Further south in Asia the mongoloids are Austronesian based in gene, they look distinct from NE people which have strong epicanthic fold, tapered eyelid or monolid with moon crease eyeshape and are defined as sino-tibetan in gene set .The makeup of is thai /indian inspired in the indo region so they may give an unique perception,they look distinct as NE rather than someone else but they can assimilate in both further east or south of asia because their appearence is like in between East & south asian.
These are tons of people that fits your han perception ,but that was not the point I was making.

 

[Sanchez]

I never said they look like anyone.
I simply pointed out the distinct "NOSE SET" in meetei ethnicity.

btw,I've also seen enough han in taiwan,their looks vary from person to person by a lot. I've also met Koreans in DELHI,they are quite dark compared to avg NE people in skin tone,it's bc India is scorching hot .

Hopefully you can invite more Meitei or Manipuri friends here. There's another thing about polo. The world believe that it originated from Manipur but it was also popular in early Chinese dynasties.

I am sorry bro, but they look nothing like Han Chinese. They are very pretty no doubt. But they look like Thai to me.

These girls are Han Chinese if you can see the difference.

这个就是湖北汉人吧！汉人还有北方汉，南方汉，长相有差别的。

 

[Nilgiri]

No buddy, even if you consider just one you need to take in the average. Like if you take one factor of height into consideration, you cannot compare one person to another person. It would not be fair. That's the reason, surveys out there need to be taken on averages.

China may be down in Badminton now because of some idiots in the National team. But they will be back. They are already starting to come back.

Well all I am saying is if we look at Indian badminton in 80s, compare to 90s then 2000s and to now....there is marked improvement because of increase in interest, funding and infra....given badminton is essentially a spectator sport.

90%+ of olympic sports are not spectator sports to be honest (and highly westernized centric)....there is no real market demand to watch them in high enough number (in between olympics)....so it becomes basically a competition of subsidy for them between govts.

Like am I going to say China is several times worse than India at Chess....just because China never produced a world champion so far? No....because China also clearly improving from cold war time to the 90s and then 2000s and then now (you now easily have 1 - 2 players who could feasibly be world champ at some point)....and Chess in China also suffers from the larger lack of interest in it (esp before)....similar to most olympic disciplines in India (and Indian govt dont want to fund them beyond any significant level purely for prestige, again especially before).

Where there is merging in interest and intensity, is where there can be genuine comparison. That's why there ought to be maybe a sporting competition purely between China and India on sports of higher interest in both. Badminton, Table Tennis, soccer, hockey, basketball come to mind....maybe China should look into Kabbadi and Cricket too

 

[beijingwalker]

Like am I going to say China is several times worse than India at Chess....just because China never produced a world champion so far? No....because China also clearly improving from cold war time to the 90s and then 2000s and then now (you now easily have 1 - 2 players who could feasibly be world champ at some point)....and Chess in China also suffers from the larger lack of interest in it (esp before)....similar to most olympic disciplines in India (and Indian govt dont want to fund them beyond any significant level purely for prestige, again especially before).

Where there is merging in interest and intensity, is where there can be genuine comparison. That's why there ought to be maybe a sporting competition purely between China and India on sports of higher interest in both. Badminton, Table Tennis, soccer, hockey, basketball come to mind....maybe China should look into Kabbadi and Cricket too

Funny joke? You are talking about mind games and chess is not a Chinese mind game which extremely few people know how to play, we play Chinese chess 中国象棋， and Go 围棋. despite of the fact that few people play chess in Chins, we are still the world champions.
Chess Olympiad: China Win Gold In Open Section, India Finish Sixth
https://sports.ndtv.com/chess/chess...ld-in-open-section-india-finish-sixth-1927573

What are Kabbadi and Cricket ? We are talking about Olympic events, which are not Chinese sports, if you are talking about non Olympic sports, in Chinese national sports meet, we have tons of Chinese sports events which no one can come close to us in them.

 

[Kai Liu]

Well all I am saying is if we look at Indian badminton in 80s, compare to 90s then 2000s and to now....there is marked improvement because of increase in interest, funding and infra....given badminton is essentially a spectator sport.

90%+ of olympic sports are not spectator sports to be honest (and highly westernized centric)....there is no real market demand to watch them in high enough number (in between olympics)....so it becomes basically a competition of subsidy for them between govts.

Like am I going to say China is several times worse than India at Chess....just because China never produced a world champion so far? No....because China also clearly improving from cold war time to the 90s and then 2000s and then now (you now easily have 1 - 2 players who could feasibly be world champ at some point)....and Chess in China also suffers from the larger lack of interest in it (esp before)....similar to most olympic disciplines in India (and Indian govt dont want to fund them beyond any significant level purely for prestige, again especially before).

Where there is merging in interest and intensity, is where there can be genuine comparison. That's why there ought to be maybe a sporting competition purely between China and India on sports of higher interest in both. Badminton, Table Tennis, soccer, hockey, basketball come to mind....maybe China should look into Kabbadi and Cricket too

Lol....Olympic contain hundreds of sports... The only overall competition recognized worldwide for measuring athletic abilities...
Even for badminton, where is india????
Badminton Word championship:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BWF_World_Championships

Chess?? It even can not considered as sport....

indian logic:
Me vs Bill Gates
Cooking Skill 1 - 0 Bill Gates
Daily expenses budget Me 2 - 0 Bill Gates
Wealth Me 2 -1 Bill Gates
Risk of Kidnap Me (low) 3 -1 Bill Gates (very high)
Potential (Me veri young) 4 -1 Bill Gates (very old)
Pollution (Me use MRT only - veri low) 5 -1 Bill Gates (use car, private jet & copper - very high)
Results Me 5 - 1 Bill Gates

indians are jokes.. using trivial things to do their "fair" comparison.... Lol.....

 

[beijingwalker]

With 1.3 billion people, India can not even win one gold medal in the Olympic Games, that's indeed mind blowing.

 

[rott]

Well all I am saying is if we look at Indian badminton in 80s, compare to 90s then 2000s and to now....there is marked improvement because of increase in interest, funding and infra....given badminton is essentially a spectator sport.

90%+ of olympic sports are not spectator sports to be honest (and highly westernized centric)....there is no real market demand to watch them in high enough number (in between olympics)....so it becomes basically a competition of subsidy for them between govts.

Like am I going to say China is several times worse than India at Chess....just because China never produced a world champion so far? No....because China also clearly improving from cold war time to the 90s and then 2000s and then now (you now easily have 1 - 2 players who could feasibly be world champ at some point)....and Chess in China also suffers from the larger lack of interest in it (esp before)....similar to most olympic disciplines in India (and Indian govt dont want to fund them beyond any significant level purely for prestige, again especially before).

Where there is merging in interest and intensity, is where there can be genuine comparison. That's why there ought to be maybe a sporting competition purely between China and India on sports of higher interest in both. Badminton, Table Tennis, soccer, hockey, basketball come to mind....maybe China should look into Kabbadi and Cricket too

"Friendlies only please: ***********@gmail.com"
okay....

 

[Sam.]

are you reatrded?

Look in the mirror.

 

[rott]

Look in the mirror.

I can a brown, fat lips, big nose and full of hair.

 

[Leishangthem]

Not meitei, but a people related to them:

http://eastasiaorigin.blogspot.com/2018/03/ethnic-origin-of-naga.html?m=1

Most Indians are either too fat or too thin. Those that are too fat, for men, often have premature man-boobs(bulging nipples), while those that are too thin look like a walking pile of bones n charcoal. I seldom see an 'OK-sized' Indian.

Here's Meetei(left) & Naga(right) side by side. They can sometimes look quite distinct from eachother in nose and face structure specifically.
.British use to refer the local Sino-Tibetan NE tribes as Naga.

But since naga meitei chikim has lived in close proximity to each other for thousands of years they are also referred to as blood brothers and assimilated with each other a lot in manipur so Naga ,meetei,chikim can also look pretty similar now. * but I personally feel naga have a tint more tibetan ad mix from the eyes.

Here's clip of ,a meetei boy and naga girl sampling street food in DELHI
*Note how they're called chingchonng by Indians on their way.

 

[Sanchez]

Here's Meetei(left) & Naga(right) side by side. They can sometimes look quite distinct from eachother in nose and face structure specifically.
.British use to refer the local Sino-Tibetan NE tribes as Naga.

But since naga meitei chikim has lived in close proximity to each other for thousands of years they are also referred to as blood brothers and assimilated with each other a lot in manipur so Naga ,meetei,chikim can also look pretty similar now. * but I personally feel naga have a tint more tibetan ad mix from the eyes.

Here's clip of ,a meetei boy and naga girl sampling street food in DELHI
*Note how they're called chingchonng by Indians on their way.

The girl on the right side looks more South Chinese or Vietnamese to me! But as you said the Meetei girl looks more to Central or Northern Han. I wondered how many cross racial marriages with Hindus there are nowadays.