What's new

China’s Rising Military Not Ready to Win Wars, U.S. Report Says

Lord ZeN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
2,483
Reaction score
15
Country
India
Location
Japan
1200x-1.jpg


China’s military isn’t ready to win wars despite spending heavily to modernize, according to a report commissioned by a U.S. congressional committee.

The People’s Liberation Army suffers from “potentially serious weaknesses” that could limit its ability to conduct the operations required to fight and win future conflicts, the report by Rand Corp. a Santa Monica, California-based research group said.

“Although the PLA’s capabilities have increased dramatically, its remaining weaknesses increase the risk of failure to successfully perform the missions the Chinese Communist Party leaders may task it to perform,” the report said. It cited Taiwan contingencies, maritime claim missions, protecting sea lines of communications and some non-war military operations.


China has been modernizing its army as its economic expansion accelerated in the early to mid-1990s, with double digit spending increases on the armed forces in most years. President Xi Jinping, also chairman of the Central Military Commission, has ordered the PLA to prepare itself to win local wars supported by modern technology and by rooting out corruption.

China has the second-biggest military budget in the world after the U.S., which spent about four times more on defense than China last year. Its budget for this year is expected to be published next month at the meeting of the National People’s Congress. The Rand paper was commissioned to support the deliberations of the U.S.-China Economics and Security Review Commission, which reports to the U.S. Congress.

Lacking Quality
The PLA’s shortcomings fall into two broad categories, the report said. It’s hampered by an outdated command structure, the poor quality of its personnel, a lack of professionalism, and corruption. Its other weakness is combat capability, which covers logistical weaknesses, insufficient strategic airlift capabilities, limited numbers of special-mission aircraft and deficiencies in fleet air defense and antisubmarine warfare.

Still, China is using its growing military muscle to aggressively assert its territorial claims in neighboring seas and is embroiled in disputes with Vietnam and the Philippines in the South China Sea that have led to confrontations. In November 2013, China declared an Air Defense Identification Zone over a stretch of sea that overlaps with Japanese and South Korean zones.

‘Large Gap’
The Rand report said the PLA’s leaders were aware of its shortcomings, with military analysts referring to the “two incompatibles” reflecting their assessment that the PLA was still unable to cope with the demands of winning a war under “informationized” conditions and successfully carrying out the PLA’s other missions.

These shortcomings contribute to a “large gap” between China and the militaries of developed countries, especially the U.S., the report said.

The paper highlighted the challenges faced by the PLA Navy, whose new surface vessels and submarines “boast impressive capabilities comparable with those of a modern world-class navy.” The navy remains challenged when it comes to integrating such complex modern weapons and equipment platforms, and its personnel aren’t fully equipped to operate and maintain them, it said.

The air force faces similar problems: coping with multiple generations of aircraft, a shortage of key special-mission aircraft and “unrealistic” training.

A further challenge comes from China’s defense industry, which, while having made “tremendous progress,” suffers from corruption, lack of competition, entrenched monopolies, delays and cost overruns, quality control problems, bureaucratic fragmentation, an outdated acquisition system, and restricted access to external sources of technology and expertise.

The report concludes that U.S. military planners need to improve their understanding of the PLA’s shortcomings so that they can ensure the U.S. and its allies are able to prevent China from using force to achieve its policy objectives.

China’s Rising Military Not Ready to Win Wars, U.S. Report Says - Bloomberg Business

@Chinese-Dragon @Shotgunner51 @ChineseTiger1986 @Genesis @gambit @SvenSvensonov @Luca1 @Rafael @TaiShang @Raphael @cirr
 
Last edited:
.
When China start replacement of its old Soviet weapon systems which forms the majority of its weapons all other Asian countries would have inducted new weapons from West and Russians . Without Russia China won't be able to project it's powers . For example take India Japan Vietnam Taiwanese Singapore etc . All these will pose a big threat to Chinese . With friends like North Korea and Pakistan China is going no where .

That's why I call it a Immatured emerging power .
 
.
Not ready to win wars against who? The US? then yes I agree. Every other country? China is pretty ready.

When China start replacement of its old Soviet weapon systems which forms the majority of its weapons all other Asian countries would have inducted new weapons from West and Russians . Without Russia China won't be able to project it's powers . For example take India Japan Vietnam Taiwanese Singapore etc . All these will pose a big threat to Chinese . With friends like North Korea and Pakistan China is going no where .

That's why I call it a Immatured emerging power .
India poses no threat to China.
 
. .
Not ready to win wars against who? The US? then yes I agree. Every other country? China is pretty ready.


India poses no threat to China.

Really ... What if India sell destroyers to Taiwan and Vietnam fully armed with Bramos ? Dude one thing I will give it to Chinese . They foresaw the future of threat posed by India . Growing indian influence will directly threaten China. Lots to do with Aksai Chin and Tibet .

Just like US is winning wars :D
First Vietnam , Afghanistan , Iraq and Syria ..:sarcastic:
Oh ... It all about what you will consider as a victory ? Defeating and destroying enemy's weapons and turning the country into a failed land ? Then they already won it except Vietnam .
 
.
Really ... What if India sell destroyers to Taiwan and Vietnam fully armed with Bramos ? Dude one thing I will give it to Chinese . They foresaw the future of threat posed by India . Growing indian influence will directly threaten China. Lots to do with Aksai Chin and Tibet .


Oh ... It all about what you will consider as a victory ? Defeating and destroying enemy's weapons and turning the country into a failed land ? Then they already won it except Vietnam .

to me US lost in Vietnam , Afghanistan and in Iraq ... today US say Afghan Talibans are not Terrorist , so that is testimony of their defeat ...
 
.
to me US lost in Vietnam , Afghanistan and in Iraq ... today US say Afghan Talibans are not Terrorist , so that is testimony of their defeat ...
Any military, including your Pakistan, would love to have that kind of 'losses'. :lol:

Please stop trying to pretend to know what you are talking about .
 
.
to me US lost in Vietnam , Afghanistan and in Iraq ... today US say Afghan Talibans are not Terrorist , so that is testimony of their defeat ...
The examples you gave are examples of guerrilla warfare. There is no certain victory in that. You can not guarantee 100% success. Success is relative in guerrilla warfare.
Whereas, between armies and armed forces, US is miles ahead of any force and capable of winning wars any in part of the globe.
 
.
to me US lost in Vietnam , Afghanistan and in Iraq ... today US say Afghan Talibans are not Terrorist , so that is testimony of their defeat ...

What is the victory ? Killing all the enemy population ? Come on bro . We are in defence forum . Atleast we know what is victory and loss . So as per you statement Pakistan won all wars with India ? Because pakistan till survive ?
Fae an author told the exact thing what you said in her book Fighting till the end.

These are just for ur know self pats on ur back . But it's otherwise
 
.
Any military, including your Pakistan, would love to have that kind of 'losses'. :lol:

Please stop trying to pretend to know what you are talking about .

well no our army will not ... cause we dont want to take or pride in killing millions of people :D

i know exactly what i am Talking about .. its just you are american ... a Patriotic one :D
 
.
Not ready to win wars against who? The US? then yes I agree. Every other country? China is pretty ready.


India poses no threat to China.
He enlisted 5 countries there that he thinks poses threat to China, and all you could choose was India? Between HK, Taiwan, Japan, India , Vietnam. You think Only India poses no threat to China. That shows your logical understanding.
 
.
What is the victory ? Killing all the enemy population ? Come on bro . We are in defence forum . Atleast we know what is victory and loss . So as per you statement Pakistan won all wars with India ? Because pakistan till survive ?
Fae an author told the exact thing what you said in her book Fighting till the end.

These are just for ur know self pats on ur back . But it's otherwise

than what is victory ? killing innocent civilians ?? if that was the case than Nazi win ww2 hands down .. :P
 
.
than what is victory ? killing innocent civilians ?? if that was the case than Nazi win ww2 hands down .. :P
Victory in war is Capturing Land , Invasion and setting up your own bases in ur enemy territory , Surrender or dismantled enemy weapons and their army .

than what is victory ? killing innocent civilians ?? if that was the case than Nazi win ww2 hands down .. :P
But one thing bhai I don't know how you thought it . Pakistan Army follows the same law while dealing with India. It's in ur publications or something like that .
U can be proud to be a true Pakistani :D

It's a true complement :p: End of the day we need to support our men guarding our borders:toast_sign:
 
.
He enlisted 5 countries there that he thinks poses threat to China, and all you could choose was India? Between HK, Taiwan, Japan, India , Vietnam. You think Only India poses no threat to China. That shows your logical understanding.
Where did I say "only" India? Learn to read before criticising my understanding, when you can't understand English yourself.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom