What's new

China’s popularity in Bangladesh dips a bit over Myanmar issue

China's influence must be activated on the ground in Bangladesh
What???? There should be no foreign influence in Bangladesh. Not China's, not India's, not USA's and not Russian's.
 
.
What I can say is my high respect for anti western alliance declined due to the recent developments. Many things can be said, many conspiracy theories can be hatched about Western and Muslim countries but when the push comes to shove they proved to be helpful. If the socialists stand like this for social injustice then their camps are bound to be empty. So shameful by Putin, Duterte, Assad. Mugabe already out, that is one less support to Myanmar. Belarus another poodle of Russia. From Russia Chechens are sympathetic to this cause, same is opposition in Philippines. Russia which is considered more close to Bangladesh totally lost in this. Atleast China tried to maintain balance by offering mediation and visit of their FM was helpful.
 
Last edited:
.
West played a smart move by outclassing China in this issue. China could have stayed neutral knowing well that Russia will veto against it....Rather than staying neutral China explicitly showed its support to MYNAMAR.

Anyway, China knows very well the sentiments of BD and its people...China can very well support Myanmar with this issue and sale some submarines to BD...BD will forget all this Rohigya issue with China...BD is simply using Rohingys issue to gain attention and brgaining power to extract good deal from West and China too...

So every one is simply playing as per their intrest...It is the poor Rohingys who are being used as Cannon fodder by BD, China and West....
 
.
For this reason, I despise those traitors within the Chinese government even more. The damage they have done to our future is beyond estimation.

Aung San Suu Kyi is not our friend at all, I was against this woman since the beginning time I joined this forum. So many Chinese are superficial in their geopolitical view and could easily get manipulated and fooled.
you are the real traitor of chinese if you are really a chinese
 
. .
He is not Chinese but a CIA payroll or Muslim which settle in Canada, he can never become Chinese!
and what is your plan of balancing Indian presence in Indian ocean and Bay of Bengal ? i am 100% sure it is not Myanmar. Myanmar has strong good view about India and might potential India's partner.
On the other hand Bangladesh has strong anti-India position,so it makes your possible ally in terms of military and OBOR.
So what are you doing and suggesting mean lack of strategic depth. Nice going :enjoy:
@Chinese-Dragon @nop @pher
 
.
and what is your plan of balancing Indian presence in Indian ocean and Bay of Bengal ? i am 100% sure it is not Myanmar. Myanmar has strong good view about India and might potential India's partner.
On the other hand Bangladesh has strong anti-India position,so it makes your possible ally in terms of military and OBOR.
So what are you doing and suggesting mean lack of strategic depth. Nice going :enjoy:

How can Bangladesh give us strategic depth? It is surrounded on all sides by India, with a government installed by India.

China doesn't have a land border with Bangladesh, which wouldn't matter anyway since Bangladesh sold us out on the Sonadia port project. Imagine we had built a huge project like CPEC in Bangladesh only to have the port project torn out of our hands at the last minute.
 
.
and what is your plan of balancing Indian presence in Indian ocean and Bay of Bengal ? i am 100% sure it is not Myanmar. Myanmar has strong good view about India and might potential India's partner.
On the other hand Bangladesh has strong anti-India position,so it makes your possible ally in terms of military and OBOR.
So what are you doing and suggesting mean lack of strategic depth. Nice going :enjoy:
@Chinese-Dragon @nop @pher

Some immature Chinese members are acting like useful idiots, and they got thanked by the anti-China right-wing Hindutva, yet labelling me as a traitor.
 
.
How can Bangladesh give us strategic depth? It is surrounded on all sides by India, with a government installed by India.
Or Bangladesh almost divided India's two major parts which are connected through narrow space called Chicken neck corridor+ If India can't dominate Bay of Bengal means India will not able to dominate Indian ocean fully.
Ever thought about these ?
 
.
How can Bangladesh give us strategic depth? It is surrounded on all sides by India, with a government installed by India.

China doesn't have a land border with Bangladesh, which wouldn't matter anyway since Bangladesh sold us out on the Sonadia port project. Imagine we had built a huge project like CPEC in Bangladesh only to have the port project torn out of our hands at the last minute.

Why all of you suddenly got an issue with Bangladesh?

All the three countries are working toward the re-stabilization, and it should be a cease-fire between all members here.

Why don't you save more energy to fight the real China bashers? When fighting against the real Chinese haters, I rarely see you guys got involved.
 
.
you are the real traitor of chinese if you are really a chinese

Guys take it easy on the personal attacks, try to debate against his argument instead.

Why all of you suddenly got an issue with Bengladesh?

All the three countries are working toward the re-stabilization, and it should be a cease-fire between all members here.

Why don't you save more energy to fight the real China bashers? When fight against the real Chinese haters, I rarely see you guys got involved.

I never had any problem with Bangladesh, but not only have they sold us out on the Sonadia port, they are accusing us of supporting genocide against Rohingyas.

They are supporting the US and Indian narrative against China. And they cancelled Sonadia port due to US and Indian influence.

Now tell me how is the CPC wrong here? They are absolutely correct.

Now ask me who I will support, the CPC or Bangladesh? I will support the CPC every time.
 
.
you are the real traitor of chinese if you are really a chinese
He is not Chinese but a CIA payroll or Muslim which settle in Canada, he can never become Chinese!

Well, there're more than 1.4 billion Chinese, we should support different viewpoints, he does have valid points in his comments whether or not he is Chinese.

BD has its unique strategic value different from MM. The weakness of India is its diverse culture and population, Kashmir and its 7 North East states. If BD can join our team, India will face a great pressure in its weak NE state, this is what MM can't or wouldn't like to offer.

It's very obvious that BD has its a dilemma of *jailed by India from three sides*, the independence of India NE is the only way to break this dilemma, it's not necessarily to become a reality, keep the pressure to India is where the China and BD have common interest.
 
.
I never had any problem with Bangladesh, but not only have they sold us out on the Sonadia port, they are accusing us of supporting genocide against Rohingyas.

They are supporting the US and Indian narrative against China. And they cancelled Sonadia port due to US and Indian influence.

Now tell me how is the CPC wrong here? They are absolutely correct.

CPC's soft attitude was also the main problem, they lack the determination to protect the small South Asian neighbors against India's aggression.

They are too timid and passive, and got pushed around by a far weaker India.

Just look at the Doklam standoff, what a perfect opportunity they have missed. If it was Chairman Mao, he would have seized this perfect opportunity and crushed India like a bug.

Just look at 1962 compared the Doklam standoff; embarrassing.

Today's PLA might be military comparable to the US, but mentality they are by far weaker than a half century ago.
 
.
Guys take it easy on the personal attacks, try to debate against his argument instead.



I never had any problem with Bangladesh, but not only have they sold us out on the Sonadia port, they are accusing us of supporting genocide against Rohingyas.

They are supporting the US and Indian narrative against China. And they cancelled Sonadia port due to US and Indian influence.

Now tell me how is the CPC wrong here? They are absolutely correct.

Now ask me who I will support, the CPC or Bangladesh? I will support the CPC every time.
1. you lost sonadia port, simply because CPC wanted full control of the port. Banglaesh would get loan and for that China would get interest. Beside that Chinese workers would work here and share would have been 50-50.
But your CPC wanted full of it. Now tell me, who was more rational here ?
2. you forgot to mention USA has eye on sonadia long before you have. We continuously denied them.
Now tell me, did not we do a favor to you by keeping USA out of here ?
 
.
CPC's soft attitude was also the main problem, they lack the determination to protect the small South Asian neighbors against India's aggression.

They are too timid and passive, and got pushed around by a far weaker India.

Just look at the Doklam standoff, what a perfect opportunity they have missed. If it was Chairman Mao, he would have seized this perfect opportunity and crushed India like a bug.

Just look at 1962 compared the Doklam standoff; embarrassing.

Today's PLA might be military comparable to the US, but mentality they are by far weaker than a half century ago.

I'm sorry but there is zero chance that I will ever support Bangladesh over the CPC.

I'm glad the CPC works for the interests of China, not for the interests of Bangladesh or the Rohingyas, or any other foreigners.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom