That is the point of Li's argument: That dictatorships are ALWAYS more flexible and rapid in redirections with no regards for the people. But the flexibility he speaks of is not of political structures but more of political wills, as in from one dictator to another, and this is also the deception Li seeks to put pass the readers.
i will see for how much time your govt will feed you and hide the dark side of communism or dictators
And patently hypocritical to boot. Communists know very well that they cannot compete on the results front as evident by the spectacular collapse of the Soviet Union and the radical changes made by China in order to survive as a nation-state. They also know that as long as wealth and political freedom disparities exist with the communist world the inferior and too uncomfortable for them to live in, the only solution is to live in functional democracies and try to effect changes from within, all the while living with higher standards than what could possibly be under communism. In other words, instead of trying to live UP to standards, communists must bring DOWN the society they are living in.
.
if needed,people can fk their leaders in democracy and last time when did u allow protest on streets??and you talk about illusions.
you see what your govt forced to see and xactly they are doing same,by giving you the lollypop of development
There is nothing 'extraordinary' about it. Absent an alternate since the communists effectively crushed all oppositions on mainland China and the Nationalists have been quite isolated on Taiwan, if the CPC does not radically change course to compensate for shifting geopolitical conditions and the effects of their disastrous policies, China would have collapsed before the Soviet empire did. These radical changes were necessary out of two sense of self preservations: Of first the Party and of second China.
