What's new

China's new leader!

That's a good point. Xi Jinping just admires some aspects of the USA but he doesn't openly fawningly look up to them as a superior and accept condescension (remember Wen Jiabao and Dai Bingguo). He does what the USA does, he doesn't do what the USA says.

:tup: :china: :tup:

Patrick Kabila of the Congo and other African dictators named Monbuto also does what the US does.

Wen straight up laughed at the US in 2005 when he passed the Anti Secession law.
 
Patrick Kabila of the Congo and other African dictators named Monbuto also does what the US does.

Wen straight up laughed at the US in 2005 when he passed the Anti Secession law.
Hu Jintao himself epitomizes the problem with the Chinese government -- lack of transparency. Wen Jiabao is just an actor who goes around pretending to care about the common people's daily struggles but at the end of the day he gets nothing done except butt kissing foreigners and looking weak and passive.

But Xi Jinping is ALREADY impressing the whole world with his charisma. He cultivates an image that appeals to the Chinese masses. He can attract people in other countries to LIKE China just like a movie star. During the Cold War entertainment personalities like Michael Jackson had a huge effect on people behind the Iron Curtain.




China looks serious, while U.S. seems frivolous

WASHINGTON -- China, for better or worse, is a serious country. The United States had better start acting like one.

I got a glimpse of the future Wednesday in the vast ballroom of a Washington hotel where hundreds of august dignitaries - and some journalists as well - gathered at a luncheon in honor of Vice President Xi Jinping, who is widely expected to become China's top leader after a year-long transition.

Xi's status is such that he was introduced by no less than Henry Kissinger, who spoke, not for the first time, of the Nixon-to-China breakthrough four decades ago. It is useful to remember that the country we now think of as a trillion-dollar creditor and the manufacturer of iPads was once a Maoist bastion, hermetically sealed against the capitalist influences of the Western world.

Let me interject that this column will include quite a few Chinese names, which can be hard for English-speaking readers to follow. Please make the effort. Being an informed citizen of the world is increasingly going to require some level of comfort with Chinese nomenclature.

Xi's father - Xi Zhongxun, once one of Mao Zedong's lieutenants - fell out of favor and was persecuted during much of that era. Xi Jinping is part of a remarkable generation that survived the apocalypse of the Cultural Revolution; he spent long, hard years as a teenager living in a cave in the poor, remote Shaanxi province.

Xi fared better than the man considered his chief rival for power and influence in China - Bo Xilai, the Communist Party chief for the Chongqing metropolitan area, which is home to nearly 30 million people. Bo's father, Bo Yibo, was one of Mao's most trusted associates before being purged in the Cultural Revolution. The whole family was sent to a prison for five years, then to a labor camp for another five. Bo Xilai's mother either committed suicide or was beaten to death.

I recount this history because it helps me understand why the men - and a few women - now running China are the way they are: impatient to make up for lost time, pathologically wary of the slightest instability, tough, resourceful, adaptable, coldly unsentimental and, as Kissinger generalized in his introduction, convinced "that every solution is the beginning of a new set of problems."

The speech Xi delivered at the luncheon was fairly stilted and anodyne, as one might have expected. He's not president yet, and clearly he was intent on not making headline news. China wants a "cooperative partnership" with the United States, he said, adding that his meetings with President Obama and Vice President Biden were "fruitful."

There was an overall message, however. Xi referred to the U.S.-China relationship as "an unstoppable river that keeps surging ahead." He was pointing out the obvious: For decades to come, the United States and China will be the world's two biggest economic powers. We're stuck with each other, like it or not.

China is a one-party state, but that does not mean there is no debate about the country's direction. Xi is considered likely to keep the nation on its current path of free-market economic growth. His political adversary Bo Xilai advocates a more robust safety net to care for the millions who are being left out of the Chinese economic miracle.

There are also internal disagreements about how aggressive China should be in asserting its military influence throughout the region, especially in the South China Sea. Addressing the environmental cost of the country's rapid development will be an urgent task for the incoming leadership. China's record on human rights and political openness is still abysmal.

These are serious questions - but Chinese leaders at least are grappling with them in a serious manner. But here in the United States?

"We're having the most frivolous of conversations - in an election year!" This assessment came from Jon Huntsman, the former ambassador to China who recently ended his bid for the GOP presidential nomination, and who attended the lunch for Xi.

We hear a lot of China-bashing on the campaign trail. Yes, there's plenty to criticize - currency manipulation, intellectual piracy, the appalling veto of a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for the ouster of the murderous Assad regime in Syria. What we're not hearing is a serious debate about farsighted reforms that are needed to keep the United States from falling behind.

If we are to thrive in a changing world, singing "America the Beautiful" isn't enough.

Eugene Robinson writes for The Washington Post and is the 2009 Pulitzer Prize winner for commentary.

China looks serious, while U.S. seems frivolous


Look, the article is actually implying that China is an advanced, modern state with equivalent moral and legitimacy status as any Western government. Sounds a bit like a throwback to the days when Westerners admired with curiousity the mysterious Celestial Kingdom on the other side of Eurasia. Xi Jinping is "soft power" incarnate.
 
that's not what they really think.

Xi had the good luck of taking over after Hu Jintao did a good job with the economy. Jiang Zemin made the country into shambles. Free market is a total scam. Xi opened the country's auto insurance sector to foreign competition, is he nuts? he allows more US propaganda into China, is he nuts? Does this serve any useful purpose? Does this strengthen China in any way?
 
that's not what they really think.

Xi had the good luck of taking over after Hu Jintao did a good job with the economy. Jiang Zemin made the country into shambles. Free market is a total scam. Xi opened the country's auto insurance sector to foreign competition, is he nuts? he allows more US propaganda into China, is he nuts? Does this serve any useful purpose? Does this strengthen China in any way?
Hu Jintao allowed the sweat and blood of Chinese people to evaporate by artificially depressing the RMB and building up excessive US dollar reserves. How much did China lose on Fanny and Freddie? 500 billion?
 
Xi Jinping's father is a good man, much better than Bo Xilai's father, this is no doubt.
 
Hu Jintao allowed the sweat and blood of Chinese people to evaporate by artificially depressing the RMB and building up excessive US dollar reserves. How much did China lose on Fanny and Freddie? 500 billion?

It would've been lost anyways. Jiang PEGGED the RMB to the dollar and lost proportionally even more in 1998. Hu took us off the dollar peg and never looked back.

How did Hu artificially depress the RMB, it rose from 8.2:1 at the start of office to 6.29 today, when he is still in office.

Jiang, who is the personal friend of Xi Jinping, kept it at 8.2:1 for 13 years.

---------- Post added at 04:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:49 PM ----------

Xi Jinping's father is a good man, much better than Bo Xilai's father, this is no doubt.

why do we care about their fathers, Deng Xiaoping's father is a farmer what does that mean, Hu's father is a small time merchant, what does that mean? this is what's wrong with China today, we look at family history instead of personal merit. This convinced me that the Cultural Revolution was not deep enough, it did not totally wipe out feudal thought.
 
It would've been lost anyways. Jiang PEGGED the RMB to the dollar and lost proportionally even more in 1998. Hu took us off the dollar peg and never looked back.

How did Hu artificially depress the RMB, it rose from 8.2:1 at the start of office to 6.29 today, when he is still in office.

Jiang, who is the personal friend of Xi Jinping, kept it at 8.2:1 for 13 years.
That is not relevant. What is important is that in 2002 when Hu Jintao came to power, China's foreign exchange reserves were only around 300 billion. In 10 years, the foreign exchange reserves have increase 6x to 8x. Now they are more than $3 trillion.

To kiss up to USA, Hu Jintao lend USA a lot of money. Way too much! This uncontrolled credit is now bad debt and China faces a catastrophic write-off. It's like Hu Jintao basically "gave away" one year of labor from every single person in China to the USA.

:tdown: to Hu and :tup: to Xi Jinping!
 
谁当都无所谓,但要相信土鳖

王立军那属于小打小闹,掀不起多大的风浪

还有重庆现在很牛,GDP都过10000亿了,上海19200亿,北京16000亿

以前重庆可差远,这也是薄熙来的功劳,虽然此人野心很大和生活腐败,但不少贪官办事效率还是有一套的,就像去年被办的那个刘志军

Mr. Bo (through Wang Lijun) killed thousands in Chongqing without proper trial. He is a hard-core cultural revolutionary.

He might be called Mao Zedong the second in that sense, but since he doesn’t have the capability nor charisma of Mao, he is much much inferior.

Jews control at most 50% financial of USA, they have been usually overrepresented to give the Anglo-Saxons a free pass.

Morgan Stanley right now is the most powerful financial institution of USA, and it is 100% Anglo-Saxon, not Jew, while other Jewish financial institutions like Rothschild have been greatly weakened.

So they seek China to contain those Anglo-Saxons.

If you read history, Morgan Stanly is controlled by Jew family called Rothchild, very much like GS. Did you pay recent attention of the bankrupt case of American Airlines? AA handed its bankrupt case to Rothchild and gave it billions of dollars as fee.

你这种说法恐怕连米国人自己都不相信

TG在新中国的建设方面的功劳可是史无前例的,反正现在说了你也不相信,再过5到10年就可以看到新中国如何的让米国和西方世界颤抖了


LOL!

Don't you guys see TG and Midi are in the same pants?

More precisely, 1% of TG is in the same pants with 1% of Midi: TG provides Midi with cheap labor and vast market, Midi provides TG with $. The only question is how much the remaining 99% could benefit.

China and US could only go conflict when the profit sharing goes wrong. Otherwise, peace will prevail.
 
LOL!
Don't you guys see TG and Midi are in the same pants?

More precisely, 1% of TG is in the same pants with 1% of Midi: TG provides Midi with cheap labor and vast market, Midi provides TG with $. The only question is how much the remaining 99% could benefit.

China and US could only go conflict when the profit sharing goes wrong. Otherwise, peace will prevail.

You can only say that TG and the Jews are now in the same pant just for the sake of profit, but not with the entire USA.

Since the Jews cannot access into the US military and the military industrial complex.

Those Jews are indeed a very powerful fraction in USA, but just don't overrepresent them since their population is still no more than 2%, and they are not omnipotent.

Before WWII, those Jews have financially controlled Germany, yet they couldn't prevent the Holocaust from the Nazi Germany.
 
That is not relevant. What is important is that in 2002 when Hu Jintao came to power, China's foreign exchange reserves were only around 300 billion. In 10 years, the foreign exchange reserves have increase 6x to 8x. Now they are more than $3 trillion.

To kiss up to USA, Hu Jintao lend USA a lot of money. Way too much! This uncontrolled credit is now bad debt and China faces a catastrophic write-off. It's like Hu Jintao basically "gave away" one year of labor from every single person in China to the USA.

:tdown: to Hu and :tup: to Xi Jinping!


I am not an ecomonist, but when you export so much more then you import wouldn't you end up with lots of US$ ?
Besides, if not US$ what other options are there. EURO ? Luckily not. Gold ? there is not enough in the world.

US$ is still the best option. I think.


Credit should also go to Hu for stoping Taiwan drift to independent.
 
chinese traitor xi jinping just gave into american demands and forced china to accept more american propaganda films into china.
this will hurt our domestic industry.

first letting foreigners enter china's auto insurance market destroying domestic companies and then allowing foreign banks to issue credit cards in china and now this.

xi jinping got nothing in return for china and crumbled to american pressure and western media propaganda and america got very favourable deals while we got barely anything in return. all we got was the typical bullsh*t human rights talk and got lectured on syria,iran,etc.
china has given concessions to america and the west.

repeat of the Qing dynasty here folks.

xi jinping has his daughter AND sister in america.
xi is a double agent, an american puppet, a lapdog for america.

sad day for china.

Have to wait and see how he proves himself when he comes in power. I salute both Wen and Hu for doing a great job. Xi has alot of issues to tackle.
 
Back
Top Bottom