What's new

China's Google Earth rival claims Arunachal.

. .
google map of the world via the united nations

imgres


---------- Post added at 01:23 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:22 AM ----------

google map of the world via the REST OF THE WORLD

Google Image Result for http://www.theindiatravelguide.com/test/indiamap1.JPG
 
.
I DON,T THINK IT MATTERS WAT THEY SAY OR WRITE IN CHINA SINCE THE REST OF THE WORLD CANT UNDERSTAND WAT THE CHINEASE ARE SIGNING.

Give us a English or United Nations Map showing Kashmir or Himachal as not indian then we have an ounce or 1% of credibility.

Who gives a dam wat they do accross the THE GREAT WALL

"NO UNDERSTAND" china language
 
.
. .
Relax. They are not saying anything new. I can understand the furore if they changed their position and claimed Himachal or something. Trust Times of India to make a mountain out of a molehill.
 
. .
seriously, indian members, this is a map service basically from the chinese government, you know very well what they claim did you seriously expect anything else?
 
.
What, India and China are going to war for this? If the Chinese government are serious about this. People shouldn't blame Indian medias hysteria.

India's government excepts Tibet as Chinese territory and didn't get into that Tibetan Independence thing in the Beijing Olympics the west was trying to pull. Why cant they respect Indian territory?
 
Last edited:
.
What India and China are going to war for this? If the Chinese government are serious about this. People shouldn't blame Indian medias hysteria.

India's government excepts Tibet as Chinese territory and didn't get into that Tibetan Independence thing in the Beijing Olympics the west was trying to pull. Why cant they respect Indian territory?

In 1962, as a result of Nehru's forwarding policy, your nation invaded our territory. After numerous warnings, we launched direct attacks in separate front lines on the border and within days we effectively conquered all your armed forces leading up to your capital city New Delhi.

As a part of the conflict, we captured South Tibet which traditionally belongs to China. However, we concluded that it will be difficult to keep occupying and defending South Tibet. We thus withdrew our troops under the condition that both side should restore controls to the pre-1962 war status.

The regime in new Delhi didn't honor its words and illegally moved troops into South Tibet after just a few months. Now you tell me why it belongs to India.

btw, when necessary, our PLA can re-capture South Tibet within days.
 
.
They will claim everything from Taiwan to anarchical Pradesh to Sikkim because now they made their own version. Point is who will use it beside Chinese.

the point is your sicked nation couldn't even come up with a domestic version.

your IT industry is just a lie.
your people are not capable of doing this.

period.
 
.
As usual the Chinese will live like frogs in their own well.
I wonder if the people know whether they're being suppressed at all.

Buddy, rest assured that they know they are suppressed but never to the children. And they also know that you have been suppressed even more: 42% huger children of the world, suppressed and deprived of food, are in your country. :hitwall:
 
.
They will claim everything from Taiwan to anarchical Pradesh to Sikkim because now they made their own version. Point is who will use it beside Chinese.

btw, please stop contributing your view on Taiwan.

tell me dude, since when india/Indians have a say about world politics? or even politics in Asia? do you seriously believe your nation is capable of this?

world politics 101: our land base missiles deployed in our border can wipe out the entire New Delhi within minutes, there will be no conflict between us in the future because you guys simply do not stand a chance.

work harder, get yourself qualified to be our enemy, for now, please just shut up.
 
.
The separation between China and Taiwan currently is political, not national, simplar to NKorea and SKorea.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom