What's new

'China's full membership will provide SAARC extra bargaining power'

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
'China's full membership will provide SAARC extra bargaining power'

'China's full membership will provide SAARC extra bargaining power'

Nizam Ahmed

China has shown its active interest in becoming a full member of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), in place of its current status as an observer, reliable sources in Dhaka said on Saturday.

"The Asian giant (China) hopes that it will attain full membership of SAARC with the approval of all its eight members in the 18th summit of this regional cooperation forum to be held in Nepal in the first half of 2013," a senior official of the foreign ministry told the FE.

According to the rules of the bloc, every decision should be unanimously approved by all the members of the SAARC that was set up in 1985 at the initiative of Bangladesh.

Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, the Maldives, Pakistan and Sri Lanka are its founding members while Afghanistan joined the regional bloc in 2005.

"If China becomes a full member, SAARC will have more bargaining capability in relations to the global trade and politically also it will help ease rivalry between India and Pakistan," said Prof. Imtiaz Ahmed, a senior teacher of the Department of International Relations of the Dhaka University.

As China has a strong economic presence in several countries of the region, it believes by becoming a full member, it will be able to contribute in a major way to steer decision-making process of SAARC for common economic development and effective regional integration.

"China should be given full membership as it is the largest trading partner of the SAARC member-countries," Prof. Imtiaz said.

The trade between China and the member-countries of the SAARC at the bilateral level are likely to increase manifold if the Asian giant becomes a full member of the bloc and plays a greater role in the South Asian Free Trading Agreement (SAFTA), observers said.

Also the South Asian countries are likely to attract a substantial amount of Chinese investment in infrastructure development, agriculture, industry, housing, manufacturing of machinery, development of banking sector and other related fields, they said.

An international conference on 'Challenges and Opportunities of Twenty First Century SAARC', organised by the Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS) in Dhaka last month had called upon the SAARC member-countries to consider giving full membership to China.

The participants at the conference said China deserves the full membership as it is the largest trading partner with each of the South Asian countries.

India's trade deficit against China rose to $43 billion in the fiscal year (FY) 2011-12 to March against $19.20 billion in the previous fiscal year, according to the Press Information Bureau of India.

The overall trade imbalance of Pakistan increased nearly to $18 billion from July 2011 to April 2012 and its trade deficit alone with China totalled at more than $10 billion, according to Pakistani media reports.
 
. .
China, for starters, is not in South Asia.


Though Tibet is.

If a Chinese province is South Asia, then we are for sure. And we have interests here too.

Ask all your neighbours and see how China is welcomed (to balance the shadow of India in this region).

If India is the only real obstacle of China to SAARC, we can surely start a new forum/platform including China and all South Asia countries but without India.

We've done so long before with more than 50 African countries. Not that long before, a dozen of Central/Eastern European PMs lined up just to have a meeting with PM Wen.

xin_242110405084193751052.jpg


F201204270507192739965801.jpg
 
.
China is an South Asian country.

As I always said, a actively SAARC incuding China is for the whole South Asia to reestalish its geopolotical polar in the world, just as important as what the Asia pacific has achieved.

India
Few people reliaze that.
 
.
China is an South Asian country.

As I always said, a actively SAARC incuding China is for the whole South Asia to reestalish its geopolotical polar in the world, just as important as what the Asia pacific has achieved.

India
Few people reliaze that.

We are usually referred to as an East Asian country, because the vast majority of our population lives in the Eastern half of China.

However our territory certainly extends into both South Asia (Tibet Autonomous Region) and Central Asia (Xinjiang province) as well.

Which is why we are actively involved in these two regions. :tup:
 
.
If taking an interest is an criteria for being part of South Asia then why only China, Russia and USA should have been part of SAARC since long time back...And then India should be a part of OIC in the same way as China is interested to be part of SAARC...
 
.
If taking an interest is an criteria for being part of South Asia then why only China, Russia and USA should have been part of SAARC since long time back...And then India should be a part of OIC in the same way as China is interested to be part of SAARC...


India can have a observer status with OIC, but for india to have the membership, we will have to change the Charter of OIC. The OIC Charter states that only Muslim Majority countries can be a member ( Indian Muslims are only 13.4% of Indian Population).
sorry, no cigar...
 
.
One of the major goals of SAARC is SAFTA - similar to ASEAN. If some of the SAARC countries try to use this forum to offset Indian influence by bringing in China, kill the SAARC/SAFTA and focus on BIMST-EC without Pakistan and establish the industrial corridor with the countries in the Indo-China. If I am not mistaken, Japan is investing in the highway from Vietnam to India and if that succeeds, that is the start for the BIMST-EC.

India has the size/location advantage which no SAARC country can overlook as they do not share borders with each other except for Afghanistan/Pakistan. If they do, it is at their own peril economically.

India can have a observer status with OIC, but for india to have the membership, we will have to change the Charter of OIC. The OIC Charter states that only Muslim Majority countries can be a member ( Indian Muslims are only 13.4% of Indian Population).
sorry, no cigar...

I do not understand the benefit in joining OIC for India. The only benefit I see is to influence the Kashmir resolution the OIC comes up with now and then. It has not affected us before and is not going to affect us in future.

For India, it is another tea/biscuit organization where the foreign affairs officials get to travel for free with their family/friends.
 
.
India would never agree to have China in the mix since that would mean extending SAFTA to China. That would be a no no.. Our politicians aren't as stupid as Pakistani politicians.

PS: Over 85% of SAARC trade goes through India. South Asian countries can always have another forum where they could extend all trading rights to China, we don't care, just don't call it SAARC..

 
.
India would never agree to have China in the mix since that would mean extending SAFTA to China. That would be a no no.. Our politicians aren't as stupid as Pakistani politicians.

PS: Over 85% of SAARC trade goes through India. South Asian countries can always have another forum where they could extend all trading rights to China, we don't care, just don't call it SAARC..


Yet the Indian government has already officially applied to join the SCO. :cheesy:

India seeks full membership of SCO - Times Of India

NEW DELHI: For the first time, India has officially sought full membership of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), the central Asian grouping dominated by China and Russia, looked upon by many as an emerging counter-weight to NATO.

Which will end up having a similar affect to an FTA in terms of reducing trade restrictions among member nations.
 
. .
Yet the Indian government has already officially applied to join the SCO. :cheesy:

India seeks full membership of SCO - Times Of India



Which will end up having a similar affect to an FTA in terms of reducing trade restrictions among member nations.

SCO is more energy related than trade. In any case, I would like to know more about this new FTA you are talking about. Is it in the making? I would like to know more info if you have.. I remember China proposed it 2011 but no one took the bait yet.
 
. .
Sorry China..you are not welcomed in SAARC...India will never let you enter in South Asia...
 
.
Anyway no use in debating it. SAARC is nothing without India and fat chance India will agree for china to enter SAARC.

This news just deserves the attention any Bangladeshi article should - nilch.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom