What's new

China's expansion of N-weapons may push others to go nuclear

Indian Tiger

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
640
Reaction score
0
KUALA LUMPUR (PTI): A dangerous arms race is fast spreading in Asia due to the proliferation of naval weaponry, according to a top Australian expert, who warned that the expansion of China's atomic arsenal could prompt others in the region to exercise their nuclear options.

"The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missile systems is now proceeding much more rapidly and extensively in Asia than in any other part of the world," Des Ball of the Australian National University's Strategic Defence Studies Centre told an international gathering here.

He told an Asia-Pacific Roundtable conference, organised by the Institute of Strategic and International Studies, that China could have its first aircraft carrier at sea within a year and that the first 50 pilot cadets were inducted at the Dalian Naval Academy in 2008 to start training on what was reported as "ship-borne aircraft flight".

"The expansion of China's nuclear arsenal could also cause other countries in northeast Asia to exercise their own nuclear options," he warned.

Ball underlined that the arms race was much more complicated and a potentially more volatile process than the bipolar superpower strategic nuclear arms race of the Cold War period, adding that East Asia was embroiled in a serious maritime strategic competition.

Hideaki Kaneda, a retired Japanese vice-admiral, now director of the Okazaki Institute in Japan, said China had begun "acquiring capability for missions beyond the Taiwan issue to perform operations in areas more distant from China's shores", The Australian newspaper reported.

Participating in the discussion, Zhang Junshe, vice-president of China's Naval Research Institute, said there was "no discernible naval arms race, but modernisation".

"China pursues a national defence policy which is purely defensive in nature, and implements a strategy of active defence," he said, adding "Where conflict threatens our national interests, a strong navy can deter the ambitions of aggressors and protect our citizens while working to maintain good order at sea."

Ball said that during the 1980s and 1990s, Asian countries spent on replacing obsolescent equipment and modernisation.

This century had seen the rise of "action-reaction dynamics", shown by the acquisition of destroyers and frigates; large amphibious transports, helicopter carriers and "sea control ships"; submarines and anti-submarine capabilities; sea-based air and missile defence platforms; and electronic warfare systems.

China now had 62 attack submarines compared with the US's 53, Ball was quoted as saying by the Australian daily.

Taiwan had acquired 14 new frigates and four guided missile destroyers, while South Korea had built the first of three Aegis-equipped destroyers, and was constructing nine German-designed submarines.

During the more predictable, bipolar Cold War situation, there were numerous arrangements, constraints and firebreaks, he said.

Now, however, "there are no arms control regimes whatsoever in Asia that might constrain or constrict acquisitions, which since 2000 have all been aimed at one or other particular neighbour", Ball said.

'China's expansion of N-weapons may push others to go nuclear' - Brahmand.com
 
.
Make no mistake the Chinese nuclear arsenal is going to head towards the numbers and sopistication of that of the US as time passes. Anything else would be criminal negligence on the part of the Chinese governement.
 
.
interesting.

as a recongized nuclear power, China's move is going to push others to go nuclear

but

it is ok for india to illegal accquire nuke even when india still refuse to sign the NPT?

what a huge load of joke!!
 
.
So, China has more than 200, the United States has more than 9,000
who push others to go nuclear ?
the answer is very clear
 
.
interesting.

as a recongized nuclear power, China's move is going to push others to go nuclear

but

it is ok for india to illegal accquire nuke even when india still refuse to sign the NPT?

what a huge load of joke!!

1) Dont drag India in it.
2) Accept us as recognised Nuclear power and we will sign NPT. When China Make it first then get recognised as Nuke power after then NPT comes in force. We dont want discrimination.
3) Can you destroy your Nuke? No.... As you think US, Russia, and other western power have it so you want to secure your position, people and country. Same for us. Our 2 neighbour from whom we had war in past have already nuke before us so.... Isnt it our right to secure our people and make them feel safe like you. Your Billions of people have value for life and we dont have our life value............... is it?
 
.
1) Dont drag India in it.
2) Accept us as recognised Nuclear power and we will sign NPT. When China Make it first then get recognised as Nuke power after then NPT comes in force. We dont want discrimination.
3) Can you destroy your Nuke? No.... As you think US, Russia, and other western power have it so you want to secure your position, people and country. Same for us. Our 2 neighbour from whom we had war in past have already nuke before us so.... Isnt it our right to secure our people and make them feel safe like you. Your Billions of people have value for life and we dont have our life value............... is it?
no need to answer peacefuls statements he is just going to answer in another negative way
 
.
Lol, Chinese arms build-up is hardly directed at India. There're are no benefit in capturing Southern Tibet/Arunachal or Kashmir that's worth dying for. All of China's nuclear and conventional capabilities are tailored against the US on Taiwan, where territorial/resource (South China Sea), moral, econonmic, geo-strategic interests are granted immediately.

I do not see the justification behind Chindian hostility.
 
.
Lol, Chinese arms build-up is hardly directed at India. There're are no benefit in capturing Southern Tibet/Arunachal or Kashmir that's worth dying for. All of China's nuclear and conventional capabilities are tailored against the US on Taiwan, where territorial/resource (South China Sea), moral, econonmic, geo-strategic interests are granted immediately.

I do not see the justification behind Chindian hostility.

China is involve in the conflict with India only because of Pakistan. This is because Pakistan is a "permanent friend" that can supply it with an alternative route to energy demands. If its not because of this reason, there won't be a need for a Chinese section in this forum.
 
.
The people scared most of South Korean nuclear weapons is not China but Japan.

The people scared most of Japanese nuclear weapons is not China but USA.

If it wasn't why did USA suppress South Korea's nuclear program in the 80's?
 
.
It is always the first priority for us to enhance our second strike capability against US missile defence system.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom