huzihaidao12
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 3,043
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
我不同意你的意见,鲁迅的文章里有反封建主义,但没有反资本主义,你从哪个文章看到有反资本主义的意思?鲁迅文章主要是反封建、反军阀、反落后,用一种非常尖锐讽刺的笔法,事实上,鲁迅是代表一种黑暗里的反抗精神,这才是一些人不能忍受的地方。I think it is a little far-fetched to say this. Actually the theme of Lu Xun's work focus on criticism of chinese traditional values particularly in Confucianism. Lu xun was one of the forerunners of new cultural movement in 1910s, when chinese scholars that times had completely negative view on chinese cultures. if Lu xun was still alive today, a lot of people would say he is a traitor, white wannabe, a CIA agent, 5 cent party member, etc.
Lu xun achieved his fame in acumen observation and in-depth reflection, and ruthless criticism on chinese culture. for the same reason he is always my favourite writer in Chinese literature. But i don't think t all of his work are suitable for high-school textbook. to appprieciate Lu xun's work, one need mental maturity, life experience, and history knowledge, which are exactly high-school student lack of. The first time i read <<狂人日记>> 12 yrs ago,i only feel lu xun was too radical and his writing genre was dull. it took me a decade to apprieciate its beauty. there are some of lu xun's work i think worthy for highschool students to read, such as <<狂人日记>> <<故乡>><<阿Q正传>>.still i think a few of his work i learnt in middle and highschool 10 yrs ago are not suitable for textbook. for example, <<纪念刘和珍君>>,<<友邦惊诧论>>, <<为了忘却的纪念>>. they were selected into textbook primarily for political reasons in the old days. actually i could barely believe these articles still exist in today's text. they sound anti-government
High school education ruined Lu Xun's work. CCP portray him as a communist warrior against feudalism and capitalism, actually he was not. i guess today's people might feel a joke to heard that Lu Xun wrote <<三味书屋>> to critcize "feudal education's persecution on children's growth" that's what i was told in middle school. besides lu xun's writing genre reads weird to modern chinese people. in his days, modern vernacular chinese was still in the cradle. it was not a good idea to make high school exposed to too much of these stuff.
至于5美分什么的,只是你自己的臆造,你见过有人这么说先生?时代不一样,那些5美分在那个时代能有这个胆子说和先生一样的话,我不介意称他们一句“民族脊梁”。