What's new

China's COVID vaccines: Do the jabs do the job?

Yeah sure, superior Sinovac is in such a huge demand that we can't even procure more than 2% of our population. :lol:
Wake up, vax was indeed in short supply around the world for a long time.
And of course, also depends on which way the sheperd wants to guide the sheep. lol

 
.
And of course, also depends on which way the sheperd wants to guide the sheep. lol

You mean this?

1672574050568-png.908821
 
.
.
.
Why did Malaysian not continue with Sinovac?

View attachment 908822
lmao, someone from SG resorted to seeking confirmation from Msia.
And again using 2 dose old data.
Next u will ask why indon use Sinovac & india dont use mrna. Why bother looking at studies then ? Learn to think ! lol
 
.
lmao, someone from SG resorted to seeking confirmation from Msia.
And again using 2 dose old data.
Next u will ask why indon use Sinovac & india dont use mrna. Why bother looking at studies then ? lol

I've cited data from HK which shown 3 doses for Omicron. But continue coping and believe that Singapore can't procure enough Sinovac when your country Malaysia don't even want LOL. Joke.
 
.
You are applying double standards yourself. You say the sample size is small in HK. Isn't the OP citing the same pool of data from HK to prove Sinovac's efficacy as well? So we can disregard this part of the article as well? Or should we cherry pick to suit your rhetoric?
When did I say OP article has the final say on anything? I always say it's very controversial and no one can conclude anything for certain, it's you who tries to talk about your theory as a matter of fact.
 
.
I've cited data from HK which shown 3 doses for Omicron. But continue coping and believe that Singapore can't procure enough Sinovac when your country Malaysia don't even want LOL. Joke.
Then why continue to use old 2 dose data to mislead ? lol
Continue to cope thinking vax procurement has nothing to do with business & political considerations. lol
And yes continue to ignore study from NUS Duke too. Again learn to think.
 
.
I never trust western scholars "studies" about China of anything, they are almost always very biased against China to suit their anti China propaganda rhetoric. Even before Chinese vaccines came out, western media had already pulled out all stops to discredit them.
 
.
And yes continue to ignore study from NUS Duke too. Again learn to think.

What did it say that we don't know since the beginning?


2021:
 
Last edited:
.
What did it say that we don't know since the beginning?
All in plain english dude. If still dont get it, I'll try to bring it down to ur logic level.
It goes something like this ......... since india dont use pfizer/moderna, therefore cow pee is better. lmao.

 
.
All in plain english dude. If still dont get it, I'll try to bring it down to ur logic level.

No new insights and no new figures provided. Just theory.

We've long known that inactivated vaccines offer broader protection against variants in theory, but in practice Sinovac performs poorer.

2021:


Death rate is twice as high:

1672578793375.png
 
.
U cannot make this s*** up !

In places where both Chinese vax & usa mrna are available, u may have heard of anecdotes where those on mrna were more infected & worse off than those on China vax.

Turns out it may not be just insignificant anecdotes. lol


Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine​

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine protects against COVID-19.
Methods Employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment on the day the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available to employees, were included...............................

By the end of the study, 10804 (21%) were bivalent vaccine boosted. The bivalent vaccine was the Pfizer vaccine in 9595 (89%) and the Moderna vaccine in the remaining 1178..................

DISCUSSION​

This study found that the current bivalent vaccines were about 30% effective overall in protecting against infection with SARS-CoV-2,.......................

.......The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. ..................
.......................
Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses. This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. Another study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7].
.........................
no point in getting upset. I have been reading this entire discussion with amusement. first, who you are arguing with are just paid kids with nothing else to do but to glorify anything and everything. It is just a matter of nationalism even though they have their head in the sand. Let it be - they get paid to be here and this forum is just festered with their propaganda rubbish with the moderators do nothing to clamp down on either by design or purpose.

mRNA is the new frontier not only in vaccines but various pathologies; covid vaccine was just one application for it.

Each country's health dept can make a choice what is best for their country. In our case, our late president died from covid despite being a denier of it. However, he had a point - we never imposed lockdown as the economy would just make life unbearable for the poor which these Chinese have learnt. CCP unfortunately failed to miserably capitalise on preparing for the normalisation. While health care may be good in cities, in the rural areas, it is pretty much basic and will not be able to handle this crisis especially with the elderly.

In our case, authorities kept mum and we were not allowed to report true number of deaths. Life carries on at the end of the day.

Our worry is next variants that will immerge out of originating Wuhan motherland after the mother/child re-unification.
 
.
No new insights and no new figures provided. Just theory.

We've long known that inactivated vaccines offer broader protection against variants in theory, but in practice Sinovac performs poorer.

2021:


Death rate is twice as high:

View attachment 908827

It has been well known that sinovac had a poorer efficacy rate. However, during time of crisis supplies were very difficult if not impossible to obtain from Pfizer/moderna, this was the only solution available. Something is better than nothing. Now, the same is not true like before; there is plenty of supply available.

In terms of omicron, sinovac has marginal efficacy and you may as well drink water. Omicron does not worry me, we have been very fortunate that this came out of southern africa and has petered off the mortality rate vs beta/delta - it is omicron child which has gone to meet Wuham mother = what will come out next from that region.
 
.
.......................

Our worry is next variants that will immerge out of originating Wuhan motherland after the mother/child re-unification.
Dude, usa had about 5 mil cases around Nov/Dec 2019 when Wuhan reported.


Coronavirus Was In U.S. Weeks Earlier Than Previously Known, Study Says​


December 1, 20202:50 AM ET
............................
Researchers came to this conclusion after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed blood donations collected by the American Red Cross from residents in nine states. They found evidence of coronavirus antibodies in 106 out of 7,389 blood donations. The CDC analyzed the blood collected between Dec. 13 and Jan. 17.

The presence of antibodies in a person's blood means they were exposed to a virus, in this case the coronavirus, and that their body's immune system triggered a defensive response.............
 
.
Back
Top Bottom