What's new

China's Blitzkrieg on U.S. Carrier

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope.

OTH radar is keeping track of the carrier.

And a large amount of J-20s are also there to provide more accurate targeting information. :lol:
A combination of satellites, OTH radar, ships, and Chinese Global Hawk will be keeping track of your carrier even before the shooting war has started.
OTH radars are very large arrays, as in meters, dozens of meters, or even hundreds of meters in array size.

Eyeballing the US Air Force Over the Horizon-Backscatter Transmitting Array
The Over-The-Horizon Backscatter Radar, often described as the world's largest radar, was developed over 25 years for $1.5 billion and occupies an area nearly twice the size of New York's Central Park.
An OTH array does not need to be completely destroyed, just need to have a part damaged and that will sufficiently deform any beam to render the array worthless.

We know exactly where you are.
And we would know exactly where those Chinese OTH stations are.

You think China is the first one to think of the OTH? :lol:
 
.
Chinese satellites, OTH radar, ships, and Chinese Global Hawk will be keeping tabs on all American ships during peacetime.

And if/when the shooting war starts, we already know where you are.

How simple can this get?

Are you going to attack every Chinese ship you see in international waters even during peacetime?

Will you launch a preemptive strike on OTH radars right now?

Let me know when that happens. :lol:
 
.
Chinese satellites, OTH radar, ships, and Chinese Global Hawk will be keeping tabs on all American ships during peacetime.

And if/when the shooting war starts, we already know where you are.

How simple can this get?

Are you going to attack every Chinese ship you see in international waters even during peacetime?

Will you launch a preemptive strike on OTH radars right now?
usaf_bombers_trio_1440-2160.jpg


No defense by China.

Let me know when that happens. :lol:
No need for me to do that. A blackout on news, OTA and the Internet, by the PLA, head of the new Chinese praetorian government, will inform you of when THAT happens. :lol:

WE will decide when this hostile relationship become a shooting war. And when we do so decide, WE will fire the first shot. The PLA will be blind. What you do not understand, understandably because you are a conscript reject, is that the side with the longer reach can and usually do force its opponent to be on the defensive at the onset of a war. USAF bombers will have China's long range detection capabilities either on the ropes or KO-ed.
 
.
usaf_bombers_trio_1440-2160.jpg


No defense by China.

You just posted pictures of the non-stealth B-52 and B-1 and you believe China has no defense against that?

Go ahead and send them in.

Let me remind you that it took the US several months to build up the forces necessary to invade Iraq.

China isn't blind.

And please bring all your forces within missile range.

That would be wonderful.:lol:

vT54r.jpg
 
. .
Chinese satellites, OTH radar, ships, and Chinese Global Hawk will be keeping tabs on all American ships during peacetime.

And if/when the shooting war starts, we already know where you are.

How simple can this get?

Are you going to attack every Chinese ship you see in international waters even during peacetime?

Will you launch a preemptive strike on OTH radars right now?

Let me know when that happens. :lol:
Why aren't you sure the Americans are doing that right now?
 
.
You just posted pictures of the non-stealth B-52 and B-1 and you believe China has no defense against that?

Go ahead and send them in.

Let me remind you that it took the US several months to build up the forces necessary to invade Iraq.

China isn't blind.

And please bring all your forces within missile range.

That would be wonderful.:lol:
No one is talking about 'invading' mainland China. If China is not Iraq, then the US tactics for China will not be as Iraq's. This 'China is not Iraq' is simplistic thinking. But understandable on your part.
 
.
WE will decide when this hostile relationship become a shooting war. And when we do so decide, WE will fire the first shot.

All talk and no action.

You didn't nuke China during the Korean war because China was protected by the Soviet Union.

After that, you needed China to contain the Soviets during the Sino-Soviet split.

So the time to strike China was probably in the early 90s right after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

But you didn't.

Instead, you went to Iraq.

And now you're still in Afghanistan.

In the meantime, the US maintains the world's largest trade deficit with China making us richer by the year.

How dumb can you get? :lol:
 
. .
All talk and no action.

You didn't nuke China during the Korean war because China was protected by the Soviet Union.

After that, you needed China to contain the Soviets during the Sino-Soviet split.

So the time to strike China was probably in the early 90s right after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

But you didn't.

Instead, you went to Iraq.

And now you're still in Afghanistan.

In the meantime, the US maintains the world's largest trade deficit with China making us richer by the year.

How dumb can you get? :lol:
Um the Soviet Union was about to nuke you in 1969.
 
.
No one is talking about 'invading' mainland China. If China is not Iraq, then the US tactics for China will not be as Iraq's. This 'China is not Iraq' is simplistic thinking. But understandable on your part.

If those tactics consist of sending in unescorted B-52s and B-1s against China, go right ahead.

Just do it.:lol:

vT54r.jpg
 
.
If those tactics consist of sending in unescorted B-52s and B-1s against China, go right ahead.

Just do it.:lol:
More simplistic thinking. Just because a B-2 may be unescorted, what make you think it will be detectable? And by what definition do you mean 'escort'? The kind you see in movies where the setting is WW II where bombers and fighters are within visual range of each other? I do hope the PLA thinks like you do. It will make its defeat so much easier.
 
.
. .
If those tactics consist of sending in unescorted B-52s and B-1s against China, go right ahead.

Just do it.:lol:

vT54r.jpg

yar, except some fancy statements, you are not talking with any sense.... how many times you will post same pics....:rofl:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom