What's new

China won, but never wanted, Sino-Indian war

xataxsata

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
997
Reaction score
0
This article is from the Govt of China's official propaganda newspaper.

China won, but never wanted, Sino-Indian war


be807ae1-ec3f-40b9-971f-5352fcb1bf81.jpeg



By Hong Yuan

It has been half a century since peace returned to the Sino-Indian border following the end of the border war in 1962. But 50 years ago, when China faced several difficulties both domestically and internationally, the Nehru administration, encouraged by the US and the Soviets, brought more trouble to the Sino-Indian border between 1959 and 1962.

China initially tried to avoid military confrontation, out of respect to India's ancient culture and sympathy that it had suffered a similar painful past of oppression by colonial powers. However, India's persistent provocation eventually breached China's bottom-line, and the People's Liberation Army (PLA) was forced to join the battle in self-defense.

Under the command of the central military commission, Chinese soldiers fought bravely and selflessly despite harsh conditions. They not only broke India's offense, but also destroyed its elite forces, such as the Seventh Brigade of the Fourth Infantry Division, and captured Brigadier John Parashuram Dalvi.

But when the sound of China's artillery reached New Delhi, the PLA decisively halted its military operation and pulled back its troops. The PLA's performance in the war shocked Western strategists and did its country proud. Its victory has also brought peace on one of China's most important borders for half a century.

War is a negotiating approach, but not a goal. Similarly, China's decision to fight back against India in the 1962 border war was to strike a peace with its neighbor. Therefore, while fighting with the Indian troops, China constantly urged the Indian government to end the conflicts and solve the border issue on the negotiating table.

China's peaceful intentions were further testified by its unilateral ceasefire on November 22, 1962, and its withdrawal of troops a few days later to 20 kilometers from the line of actual control since November 7, 1959.

China also carefully treated Indian prisoners of war. Injured Indian soldiers were given proper medical treatment and were sent back to their homeland. Chinese soldiers were even ordered by their commander to polish seized Indian weapons and return them back to the Indian army. This was unprecedented.

Then Chinese leader Mao Zedong believed the battle with India was also a political combat, and the real target was not Nehru but the US and the Soviets that had been plotting behind the scenes against China.


As to Nehru, Mao wanted to wake him up from the superpowers' influence by giving him a heavy punch, so that he would come to his senses and end the war. War is an extreme means of communication between civilizations.

The Sino-Indian Border War was not only a special interaction of two ancient civilizations, but also an unfortunate tragedy between two formerly colonized and oppressed states.

Mao understood this from both a historical and philosophical perspective, and so gave India room to maneuver and think during the war. By calling for a unilateral ceasefire when in an advantageous position, pulling back troops and returning prisoners of war and well-maintained weapons to India, Mao wanted to send a message of peace to India, and to lay a good foundation for long-term friendship.

Some in India argued that these peaceful gestures were made to humiliate the Indian army. Such an understanding is narrow-minded.

The Chinese and Indian civilizations have generally been in a friendly relationship for 2,500 years. In ancient times, Chinese Buddhists believed that India was the paradisiacal home of Buddha, and this positive feeling about India has never faded.

Now, the two countries have found more similarities. They both suffered gravely from colonial invasion and oppression in the 18th and 19th centuries, and they are both now powerful emerging countries and key members of the BRICS.

These similarities and historical bonds indicate the border issue between China and India can be solved, as the issue was a result of former colonial rule.

Fifty years ago, the Indian government was blinded by selfish interests, and wanted to force the Chinese to accept an illegal border line created by colonial powers. This was boldly rejected. Today, both countries need to learn from their ancient friendly ties and the lesson from the war. For the Chinese, they love peace but they will also firmly defend their land.

China won, but never wanted, Sino-Indian war - Globaltimes.cn
 
India lost but also didn't want the war .Tell us something we don't know .

If Chinese were really so nice they would give us back Aksai Chin that they took from us in 1962 and solve the border issue through talks .

No , they decided to keep the captured territory and also decided to lay claim to Arunachal with an eye especially on Tawang .
 
to be honest it was actually india's fault but people will do disagree here.
But Indian foreign policy went a bit too extreme in accordance to china. The extent was placing indian troops inside tibet even further inside arunachal pradesh.. read in some declassified docs.. So the chinese were having a discomfort in indian troops inside tibetian border in some cases hence invaded when Indians didnt expected it. NB the concentration of indian troops were low but there as it did have significance which lead to war. I would also like to ask question on why is Indian media always complaining of chinese entering indian territory when Indians do the same on chinese territory but as china is commies they dont get reported as usual but atleast they show restraint where as Indian media always report however stupid news it is sometimes
 
when Indians do the same on chinese territory but as china is commies they dont get reported as usual but atleast they show restraint where as Indian media always report however stupid news it is sometimes

How do know that something like that happened, unless it was reported?
 
How do know that something like that happened, unless it was reported?
showing restraint in such matter is much wiser than shout out loud. It makes you look weak and helpless. Restraint is the best thing in such cases as it occurs both ways. I would also ask you this question, why does your media never reports Indian incursions in chinese territory?
 
This article is from the Govt of China's official propaganda newspaper.

China won, but never wanted, Sino-Indian war


be807ae1-ec3f-40b9-971f-5352fcb1bf81.jpeg



By Hong Yuan

It has been half a century since peace returned to the Sino-Indian border following the end of the border war in 1962. But 50 years ago, when China faced several difficulties both domestically and internationally, the Nehru administration, encouraged by the US and the Soviets, brought more trouble to the Sino-Indian border between 1959 and 1962.

China initially tried to avoid military confrontation, out of respect to India's ancient culture and sympathy that it had suffered a similar painful past of oppression by colonial powers. However, India's persistent provocation eventually breached China's bottom-line, and the People's Liberation Army (PLA) was forced to join the battle in self-defense.

Under the command of the central military commission, Chinese soldiers fought bravely and selflessly despite harsh conditions. They not only broke India's offense, but also destroyed its elite forces, such as the Seventh Brigade of the Fourth Infantry Division, and captured Brigadier John Parashuram Dalvi.

But when the sound of China's artillery reached New Delhi, the PLA decisively halted its military operation and pulled back its troops. The PLA's performance in the war shocked Western strategists and did its country proud. Its victory has also brought peace on one of China's most important borders for half a century.

War is a negotiating approach, but not a goal. Similarly, China's decision to fight back against India in the 1962 border war was to strike a peace with its neighbor. Therefore, while fighting with the Indian troops, China constantly urged the Indian government to end the conflicts and solve the border issue on the negotiating table.

China's peaceful intentions were further testified by its unilateral ceasefire on November 22, 1962, and its withdrawal of troops a few days later to 20 kilometers from the line of actual control since November 7, 1959.

China also carefully treated Indian prisoners of war. Injured Indian soldiers were given proper medical treatment and were sent back to their homeland. Chinese soldiers were even ordered by their commander to polish seized Indian weapons and return them back to the Indian army. This was unprecedented.

Then Chinese leader Mao Zedong believed the battle with India was also a political combat, and the real target was not Nehru but the US and the Soviets that had been plotting behind the scenes against China.


As to Nehru, Mao wanted to wake him up from the superpowers' influence by giving him a heavy punch, so that he would come to his senses and end the war. War is an extreme means of communication between civilizations.

The Sino-Indian Border War was not only a special interaction of two ancient civilizations, but also an unfortunate tragedy between two formerly colonized and oppressed states.

Mao understood this from both a historical and philosophical perspective, and so gave India room to maneuver and think during the war. By calling for a unilateral ceasefire when in an advantageous position, pulling back troops and returning prisoners of war and well-maintained weapons to India, Mao wanted to send a message of peace to India, and to lay a good foundation for long-term friendship.

Some in India argued that these peaceful gestures were made to humiliate the Indian army. Such an understanding is narrow-minded.

The Chinese and Indian civilizations have generally been in a friendly relationship for 2,500 years. In ancient times, Chinese Buddhists believed that India was the paradisiacal home of Buddha, and this positive feeling about India has never faded.

Now, the two countries have found more similarities. They both suffered gravely from colonial invasion and oppression in the 18th and 19th centuries, and they are both now powerful emerging countries and key members of the BRICS.

These similarities and historical bonds indicate the border issue between China and India can be solved, as the issue was a result of former colonial rule.

Fifty years ago, the Indian government was blinded by selfish interests, and wanted to force the Chinese to accept an illegal border line created by colonial powers. This was boldly rejected. Today, both countries need to learn from their ancient friendly ties and the lesson from the war. For the Chinese, they love peace but they will also firmly defend their land.

China won, but never wanted, Sino-Indian war - Globaltimes.cn

First india never had artillrey in NE area, nor had any mechanized vehicles... All they used was stick and horses...
There was nothing in that to defeat them,... But when "real" troops arrived with artillery and better weapons, they backed off..
WHY?

to be honest it was actually india's fault but people will do disagree here.
But Indian foreign policy went a bit too extreme in accordance to china. The extent was placing indian troops inside tibet even further inside arunachal pradesh.. read in some declassified docs.. So the chinese were having a discomfort in indian troops inside tibetian border in some cases hence invaded when Indians didnt expected it. NB the concentration of indian troops were low but there as it did have significance which lead to war. I would also like to ask question on why is Indian media always complaining of chinese entering indian territory when Indians do the same on chinese territory but as china is commies they dont get reported as usual but atleast they show restraint where as Indian media always report however stupid news it is sometimes

We will place our troops anywhere inside our territory...
We just placed troops in places, where troops have never been deployed, so whats the problem?
 
showing restraint in such matter is much wiser than shout out loud. It makes you look weak and helpless. Restraint is the best thing in such cases as it occurs both ways. I would also ask you this question, why does your media never reports Indian incursions in chinese territory?

actually it does...even army admits that they visit disputed territory.and midea even reported once about the story how a Indian army platoon crossed the border due to heavy fog and how that matter was solved quickly...India never got a chance to place troops inside tibet.if they did,and if tibetans fight,they would hold Chinese attack for months(thats what they claimed)..what they claimed placing soldiers in tibet is Arunachal Pradesh.

All they used was stick and horses...


:lol::lol::lol::lol::

i think you should read history from somewhere else other than CCP one..we still use mules in this area for supply.what indian army got was only few magazines of ammo per head.i think even a super soldier can't survive with that.
 
in that case china should move back from aksai chin and drop the claim of arunachal pradesh
 
First india never had artillrey in NE area, nor had any mechanized vehicles... All they used was stick and horses...
There was nothing in that to defeat them,... But when "real" troops arrived with artillery and better weapons, they backed off..
WHY?




We will place our troops anywhere inside our territory...
We just placed troops in places, where troops have never been deployed, so whats the problem?

I mean troops placed further inside Tibet which as per arunachal pradesh as part of india further inside tibet further than AP
 
It is unfortunate that most Indians still harbour the delusion that it was China that instigated the border war back in 1962. Most records - western and Chinese- attributes Indian foward policy, arogance and irresponsible loquaciousness as the main reason for the war.
It is well known that premier Zhou Enlai telegramed 3 messages to Nehru to halt the fighting during the war despite PLA forces decimating their Indian counterparts in the battlefield. Nehru didnt even bother to respond!
China has moved on, the 62 war is considered another era.
India however still has not come to terms with the war, their humiliating loss poisoning the psyche and pride of the Indian people to this day.
Indian comrades it is time to move on.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom