Kamikaze Pilot
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 5,241
- Reaction score
- -66
- Country
- Location
Be it war or be it economy, the comparison between China and India is not fair because India was under colonial rule for 200 years. Even a conservative guess would put the duration of colonialism at 150 years. Why else would there be revolt in 1857?
150-200 years of racist colonial rule can change the country beyond recognition. An example should drive home the point. When Abraham Lincoln was president, only half of what is now USA was controlled by Anglo-Saxons. By the turn of the century the vast territory was annexed by wiping out the native Americans who had established societies.
When the British left India, they didn't want orderly withdrawal. They left no stone unturned to create chaos.
1. British orchestrated partition on two fronts.
2. British orchestrated the partition violence.
3. The treaties which bound the princely states to the central government ceased to exist. It was left to Indian leaders to unite the country by persuasion or by force.
4. British created the Kashmir dispute by making suggestions to politicians and armies of India and Pakistan. I have heard that in 1948 war, the chiefs of the two armies - who were English - were in touch with each other throughout the war.
5. British handed over the reins of administration to impressionable men who were British agents till independence.
6. British issued discouraging and insulting statements about India's future.
China never faced such problems. China had military experience of fighting wars. In fact it was on expansionist spree annexing Tibet and laying claims to territories of countries like Bhutan. It was a permanent member of United Nations Security Council.
So clearly China had a head start in the competition.
150-200 years of racist colonial rule can change the country beyond recognition. An example should drive home the point. When Abraham Lincoln was president, only half of what is now USA was controlled by Anglo-Saxons. By the turn of the century the vast territory was annexed by wiping out the native Americans who had established societies.
When the British left India, they didn't want orderly withdrawal. They left no stone unturned to create chaos.
1. British orchestrated partition on two fronts.
2. British orchestrated the partition violence.
3. The treaties which bound the princely states to the central government ceased to exist. It was left to Indian leaders to unite the country by persuasion or by force.
4. British created the Kashmir dispute by making suggestions to politicians and armies of India and Pakistan. I have heard that in 1948 war, the chiefs of the two armies - who were English - were in touch with each other throughout the war.
5. British handed over the reins of administration to impressionable men who were British agents till independence.
6. British issued discouraging and insulting statements about India's future.
China never faced such problems. China had military experience of fighting wars. In fact it was on expansionist spree annexing Tibet and laying claims to territories of countries like Bhutan. It was a permanent member of United Nations Security Council.
So clearly China had a head start in the competition.