China warns of instability in response to report on US, India considering patrols in South China Sea

[kasper95]

China is not the only one who arm but US and now Russia are selling arm to Pakistan. doesn't seem you guys complain about that and did we complain to Russia that they arm India against us?, all arms you guys got from Russia were more sophisticated than what we got from them. As for NW you better ask Pakistanis friends and don't put the blame on us. And we don't have any problem if you sell missile to Vietnam such Brahmos, subs or warship...if you're able to compete with Russia.

If you want to come to SCS, we don't have problem, it's a fair game that you come to SCS and we go to Indian Ocean. When we go to Indian Ocean, we go alone, we don't need protector nor other nation to gang up against Indian but if you think that by join US to counter us in SCS, you make a big mistake, we can very well return the same favor to you.



You can do Vietnam any favor you want.

you would not have said that if you had Vietnam with nuclear weapons and long range missiles ,trust me

 

[帅的一匹]

Guess why is J16 bomber and J20 is not in the sale list to PAF? I guess you Indian shall know it. We don't wanna change the balance of power. If we sell those fighter to PAF, they are able to penetrate your air defense and give you a punch. We Chinese are not war monger, you know?

I would rather save India there cause you might be a important equilibrium force that we need to kick those westerner out of Asia. Don't ruin the last respect and hope we have in you.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

you would not have said that if you had Vietnam with nuclear weapons and long range missiles ,trust me

Lol, we have nuclear North Korea, US + Japan....and you think we will be scare by nuclear Vietnam?

 

[帅的一匹]

Have some spine and unite with China.

USA is playing you like a chess, they finally sell F16 to Pakistan. Can you count on Yankee to go against China?! You can ask deep inside of your heart, did China fire a single bullet 50 years since 1962 along the border!!! The muscle building of China is to target insatiable USA, don't fit yourself in the bracket.

 

[chhota bheem]

Missile yes, nuke no.

By the way, can India build Hydrogen bomb?

What China help Pakistan to do is to build minimal deterrence to India!! Not mean to destroy India, do you understand?

if deterance was the reason,now they have nuclear weapons,nothing can come close to any deterance to what NW can.so will China stop all the military aid to them.

common bro who are we kidding.

 

[帅的一匹]

if deterance was the reason,now they have nuclear weapons,nothing can come close to any deterance to what NW can.so will China stop all the military aid to them.

common bro who are we kidding.

NW is the weapon never gonna be applied man. Conventional weapon are always applied. Do you think Pakistan will first use NW to India when India has ten times strong NW than them? JF17 is superior to Rafale?!

When you compare NW Arsenal between India and Pakistan is like comparing India to China's, dare India first use NW to China when China has Hydrogen bomb?

Actually we Chinese like Indians, unlike Nixon described Indians as the most despicable race on this planet.

The culture is quite closed.

Some times PDF member see me spew shit, actually I'm quite a non crazy man.

 

[libertycall]

Chhota Bheem's claims that: 'we could have supplied Vietnam with NW but didn't because we were being nice to China' remind me of one of those guys who in a fight throws himself in people's arms and loudly shouts, 'don't hold me back guys, i'm going to show him, just don't hold me back!'

The conditions at the time and prevented India from doing that because of very serious consequences if they had...

 

[帅的一匹]

if deterance was the reason,now they have nuclear weapons,nothing can come close to any deterance to what NW can.so will China stop all the military aid to them.

common bro who are we kidding.

Now even USA continues to provide F16 to pakistan, why can't China? JF17 is no better than F16 blk52?

 

[Hellfire]

What a troll fest! Few points

1. India will continue to traverse the South China Sea, both its naval ships and its merchant ships. Reason being very clear, India has not adopted any position either for or against China, instead calling upon all parties to mutually reach a settlement, a politically correct statement being made by both countries forever. This does not put China in a position where it needs to feel threatened by India. Local force commander may act belligerent, but then the isolated incidents are given a befitting reply and have never been aggravated by either side. (In SCS)

2. It is not in India's interest to seek confrontation with China. The land boundary dispite between India and China will remain on back burner for atleast few more decades and China is not really crazy to open a war where none is required. They have continued with their economic and military upgradation and strengthening in the true political domain of being a power by balancing both. So they are not going to get dragged into the irresponsible power tag by such stupidities.

3. India itself is following the aforementioned policy. Any sensible nation will. And all the statements or editorials in our trashy media is just that - trash.

4. The economic practices and trade is in upswing over the years, no one is interested in unbalancing them.

5. Any nation has the right to legitimately take steps for its own interests - India is doing so in IOR. That China is seen as a rival is but a given. Similarly, China is doing so in SCS. That it is being challenged by its neighbours there is for it to deal with. As long as the SLOCs in that area are not endangered and not denied to India, there is no legitimate Indian interest as of yet. Yes, if China was to close the lanes and enforce it militarily, the situations will change, again depending upon the international laws and ethics.

 

[vayuputhra]

Your trade going through SCS are negligible.

3% of the total trade is a lot, there are many south east Asian countries who have lesser business than India, India's trade is double than UAE and saudhi, larger than Vietnam, and our trade is ever expanding, we have our friends Japan, with whome we have a lot of business, even with 1% trade we have all the rights to navigate there is no one to stop us, oceans are not the sole prerogative of China, or China doesn't own south China sea, when you can come to Indian ocean or bay of Bengal or Arabian sea or specific ocean how can you stop others, to protect our 3% trade we which is a lot, we have all the rights to secure our ships from aggressive Chinese navy, for that we have to send our navy for escort, and we have our friends vietnam, Japan, south Korea, Australia, so as for diplomatic connection we send our naval ships on a friendly visit, as the ships has to go through SCS you should not have problems with others.

 

[SrNair]

Read this: "
The Indian navy has never carried out joint patrols with another country and a navy spokesman told Reuters there was no change in the government's policy of only joining an international military effort under the U.N. flag.

Source: China warns of instability in response to report on US, India considering patrols in South China Sea"

In short, Indian navy will attend such a practice if China agrees.

Warning worked.

US denies planned patrols with India in South China Sea as China reacts

Oh really ?
Both nations are testing the waters .In future if situation demands you can see them jointly in SCS .

 

[MKC]

China has lots of business to be in the Indian Ocean. A lot of China's imported oil and trade with Europe goes through the Indian ocean. The Marine Silk road also goes through the Indian ocean. These shipping are also under threat from pirates. The middle east is also very unstable. China needs to be there to protect its citizens. So there are many reason for China to be in the Indian ocean.

But India has no business in South China seas. Name me one.

AFAIK more than too much of trade of India passes though SCS like China's passes through Indian Oceans but India doesn't claim entire Indian Ocean.

 

[axisofevil]

we are waiting for your punch like we gave to you in 1962.

You only gave a punch, when we decided to counter and knock out .......you retreated and called for an unilateral stop to the fighting. No objective obtained or maintained.