jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
I think you are right about the HK cases but still China vetod it for his interests. I just checked Canadian Ministry of Justice have the final say even the Canadian Court have decided the verdict but with condition. So now China maybe pressuring the Canadian gov't to choose, in case Meng is guilty. Let's be honest, I don't view Meng as important as other Chinese members view, it may stall Hauwei for some time but it also encourage Hauwei work even harder and not so much family oriented. Since there are not much informations of this case available, let's wait and see what will happen next.
You got some senses here.
Canada have the right to refuse repatriation if the accused is risking to lose heir life or limbs, and Canada will simply flat out refused any extradition if the crime is punishable by death, and also, Canadian law allow accused to fight for their own extradition.
I guess we should have let the case run its course, if Meng is innocents, then the jokes is on the American, and if Meng is guilty, then Huawei should take the consequence, and as you said, Meng is not some big shot Huawei cannot do without, so I don't see why the Chinese Government need to interject themselves on the issue, that make the Chinese government look bad in international light.