What's new

China Unveils FC-31; Brief Analysis of Possible Buyer(s)

Quwa

Research Partner
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
2,538
Reaction score
47
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
China Unveils FC-31; Brief Analysis of Possible Buyer(s)

9 November 2015

By Bilal Khan

The Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) recently unveiled the FC-31 Gyrfalcon at the 2015 Dubai Air Show. The twin-engine FC-31 is marketed as a 5th-generation multi-role stealth fighter based on the J-31 that has been under development and testing in China for the past several years. It is an export-focused design meant for prospective customers unable to access and/or afford the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightening II. A surface level observation shows that the FC-31 shares numerous design similarities with the F-35 and F/A-22, especially in terms of low-observability and low-detectability design traits.

Lin Peng, the AVIC project manager, told the media that the agency was looking for an international partner, ostensibly to assist with the development of the fighter (Aviation Week). That said, AVIC noted that it was negotiating with the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) for the purchase of FC-31s.

AVIC officials claimed to the media that the FC-31’s low-observable design would position it well against a range of multi-spectrum sensors, including L-band and Ku-band radars (Aviation Week). In addition, the aircraft is equipped with six external as well as four internal weapons stations or hardpoints. The internal weapons bay can carry up to 2000kg in munitions; externally the fighter can take up to 6000kg (Aviation Week). In terms of the FC-31’s expected specifications and performance parameters, the following is what AVIC gave (via Aviation International News).

Length is 55 feet, 1.5 inches, span is 37 feet, 8.75 inches and height is 15 feet, 8.5 inches. Maximum takeoff weight is listed at 55,000 pounds and weapons carrying capability at 17,600 pounds. AVIC claims that the FC-31 will be able to reach a service ceiling of 52,500 feet, and a top speed of Mach 1.8. Combat radius is 648 nm. The airframe is stressed to +9/-3 g, and has a projected service life of 6,000 to 8,000 hours, or 30 years.

AVIC is claiming that the FC-31 will exhibit numerous design changes and improvements to the J-31. Indeed, the FC-31 mock-up shows a number of airframe alterations as well as the addition of an integrated Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS). In addition, AVIC promises that the FC-31 would offer “outstanding situational awareness” through the use of an advanced radar (Defense News). According to AVIC the FC-31 will see its first flight in 2019, and will enter full service by 2024 (Defense News).

Any Takers?

It is no secret that China has been looking to drive its aircraft industry to success with exports. Aircraft, with fighter aircraft in particular, are high value and high profile sales with several decades’ worth of maintenance and upgrade opportunities down the line.

But besides its established export markets (most notably Pakistan), China has not been able to make many inroads (relative to its product offerings) in the world fighter market. Even the JF-17, a good fighter package in its own right, is having trouble penetrating and adapting to a market that has become bifurcated; customers who would have considered the JF-17 are instead going for low-powered counter-insurgency (COIN) and close air support (CAS) designs such as the Embraer A-29 Super Tucano.

The FC-31 is looking to meet the apparent opportunities left open by the Lockheed Martin F-35. To China, there is a fairly big market of prospective buyers who may be interested in a ‘5th generation’ platform, but are unable to acquire what is on offer by the West due financial and/or political constraints. The FC-31 is meant to alleviate both limitations by offering key elements of the F-35 at a lower cost, whilst still considerably improving the operational capabilities of the user. Speaking in ideal terms, an FC-31 equipped with Anti-Radiation Missiles (ARM) or Air Launched Cruise Missiles (ALCM) in its internal storage bay makes for a good strike package, does it not? This is basically the message China is trying to push.

So will it succeed? Well, that depends on the buyer. Political and financial considerations are important, yes, but so are the prospective buyer’s actual needs and the aircraft’s actual performance.

In terms of performance it is unclear how good the final product will be, especially in light of the criticisms some observers lent to the J-31 when it (the platform the FC-31 is based on) gave its performance at Airshow China in November 2014. Aviation International News’ Reuben Johnson noted that it “[bled] too much energy and the pilot had hard time keeping the nose up during turns and other maneuvers. He also had to engage afterburners far too often to maintain a proper energy utilization curve.” But to be fair the J-31 was a prototype design, so let us hope that the FC-31 is a substantive improvement in this regard.

In terms of needs however, I think there is some genuine potential (assuming the FC-31 meets the user’s performance parameters). Pakistan is slotted as one of the leading (if not the first) buyer of the FC-31 (IHS 360 Jane’s). Even with the induction of the JF-17 the Pakistan Air Force (PAF)’s Mirage ROSE (short for Retrofit Strike Element) fighters will continue to soldier on for years to come; these are the PAF’s primary strike and – before the induction of JF-17 with the No. 2 squadron – maritime platforms.

With EOTS (which would serve as an integrated targeting pod) and internal weapons storage bay, the FC-31 could be a suitable long-term replacement of the ROSE in the strike department. The twin-engine configuration of the FC-31, paired with a powerful radar and strong electronics warfare (EW) and electronics countermeasure (ECM) suites, would make for a very good maritime fighter as well. Of course, if the PAF persists with using the RD-93 turbofan, then it will gain from engine commonality (between FC-31 and JF-17) as well, which is a plus from a maintenance standpoint.

Overall, in the context of the PAF it is important to understand that the FC-31 would necessarily be considered a ‘game changer’ or a decisive edge against India. Absolutely not. Rather, it could be a viable successor to the venerable Mirage ROSE, which to date and into the foreseeable future will carry a significant portion of the PAF’s strike missions. In that context, the FC-31 could very well be an extremely important addition considering the role it would take on, and in that context, would most certainly be a credible means of defence for the PAF as well as the armed forces generally.

Iran (Defense News) is also seen as another possible opening buyer, for whom military sanctions will be lifted by the time the FC-31 is in testing and nearing operational clearance. In Iran’s case the reasons are more to do with refreshing a largely depleted and obsolete fighter fleet. The induction of the FC-31 would be a clear improvement across the board as well as a good visual morale booster, not just for the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF), but the Iranian population. It would not at all surprise me if Iran ends up being the first actual customer of the FC-31, even before Pakistan (who has is China’s biggest importer of arms).
 
.
I personally do not think that FC31 will be able to qualify as 5thG fighter or strike aircraft. It will end up as 4.5th or 4++G aircraft and will belong to category of F15SE.
PAF in particular if decide to use RD93 then it will be a major negative point since those smoky and (comparatively low thrust) engines don't have right to be placed in a fifth generation aircraft......
My point is, I don't know how good FC31 will be or how much improvements it will have over J31, but it will not be able to compete likes of other 5th Generation aircrafts of that time.........
We must also focus on another similar platform.....
May be J20, may be TFX......

Jf31 for strike role (yes mutual product) and XX as air superiority fighter.......
 
.
I personally am not optimistic about FC-31s' prospects either. The aircraft as it is right now is heavily dependant on a foreign or domestic partnership to fund research and development. And even if finds that, the Chinese produced AESA, avionics, electro optical and EW suite will always remain questionable entities in comparison to their western counterparts and, very limited information released by the parent companies. But, if a buyer tomorrow settles for less because of unavailability of western tech due to various reasons, there's still one lumbering problem that will haunt the otherwise finely designed platform, i.e., engines. Jet engines are one bottleneck that Chinese haven't been able to overcome after decades of tinkering with the tech and, I do not see them going anywhere with it for an other decade either. Thus, it's a big no no from my humble PoV but, in regards to it's future customer, I agree that Iran could be it's first potential buyer and operator.

If I had my pick, I'd choose the South Korean TFX programme for many reasons.
 
.
Even in the future,possibly only handful countries will maintain meaningful number of 5th Gens.And many of these already chose F-35,some has their Indigenous Projects,India and Russia has a JV which might become potential contender of F-35 and J-31.So,Possibility is quite grim,considering a 5th Gens are extremely costly and not many countries of "Chinese Camp" has capability to buy this in good number.

Pakistan and some other 2-3 countries may go for it,but others will possibly choose a decent 4.5 gen from west over a 5th gen coming from China.One of the major factor of course is lack of War.
 
.
I personally am not optimistic about FC-31s' prospects either. The aircraft as it is right now is heavily dependant on a foreign or domestic partnership to fund research and development. And even if finds that, the Chinese produced AESA, avionics, electro optical and EW suite will always remain questionable entities in comparison to their western counterparts and, very limited information released by the parent companies. But, if a buyer tomorrow settles for less because of unavailability of western tech due to various reasons, there's still one lumbering problem that will haunt the otherwise finely designed platform, i.e., engines. Jet engines are one bottleneck that Chinese haven't been able to overcome after decades of tinkering with the tech and, I do not see them going anywhere with it for an other decade either. Thus, it's a big no no from my humble PoV but, in regards to it's future customer, I agree that Iran could be it's first potential buyer and operator.

If I had my pick, I'd choose the South Korean TFX programme for many reasons.

South Korean TFX is a very bad choice. First, its not even a stealth fighter. No internal weapon bay which weapons it carries contributed to RCS. Most of the avionics and engine depend on foreign assist. US recently reject South Korea request for 4 major components which stall this project.

U.S. Tech Rebuff Slams Korea's KFX Fighter

South Korea many fanciful weapon heavily depend on foreign assist. Its K2 tank and SPH major component all depend foreign import.

Pakistan will be making a right choice when partner with an aviation powerhouse like China who design and manufacturer all components by herself. Even right now, we are making our own engine and depends on Russian engine supply is getting lesser and lesser.
 
.
I personally do not think that FC31 will be able to qualify as 5thG fighter or strike aircraft. It will end up as 4.5th or 4++G aircraft and will belong to category of F15SE.
PAF in particular if decide to use RD93 then it will be a major negative point since those smoky and (comparatively low thrust) engines don't have right to be placed in a fifth generation aircraft......
My point is, I don't know how good FC31 will be or how much improvements it will have over J31, but it will not be able to compete likes of other 5th Generation aircrafts of that time.........
We must also focus on another similar platform.....
May be J20, may be TFX......

Jf31 for strike role (yes mutual product) and XX as air superiority fighter.......
jf-17 block 3 is also 4+ generation jet we need 5th not 4++ gen jet.
 
.
jf-17 block 3 is also 4+ generation jet we need 5th not 4++ gen jet.

No way!

The FC-31 is way way way better than the JF-17 will ever be。

There is ABSOLUTELY no comparison between the FC-31 and the last iteration of the JF-17。

I personally do not think that FC31 will be able to qualify as 5thG fighter or strike aircraft. It will end up as 4.5th or 4++G aircraft and will belong to category of F15SE.
PAF in particular if decide to use RD93 then it will be a major negative point since those smoky and (comparatively low thrust) engines don't have right to be placed in a fifth generation aircraft......
My point is, I don't know how good FC31 will be or how much improvements it will have over J31, but it will not be able to compete likes of other 5th Generation aircrafts of that time.........
We must also focus on another similar platform.....
May be J20, may be TFX......

Jf31 for strike role (yes mutual product) and XX as air superiority fighter.......

Forget about J-20。

It is NOT available for export to any country,including Pakistan。
 
.
South Korean TFX is a very bad choice. First, its not even a stealth fighter. No internal weapon bay which weapons it carries contributed to RCS. Most of the avionics and engine depend on foreign assist. US recently reject South Korea request for 4 major components which stall this project.

U.S. Tech Rebuff Slams Korea's KFX Fighter

South Korea many fanciful weapon heavily depend on foreign assist. Its K2 tank and SPH major component all depend foreign import.

Pakistan will be making a right choice when partner with an aviation powerhouse like China who design and manufacturer all components by herself. Even right now, we are making our own engine and depends on Russian engine supply is getting lesser and lesser.

Well, we are in the process of helping our S.Korean friends with their TF-X fighter program, hopefully we will help them finish this great fighter. We make the best engines in the world(at par with the U.S if not better) not like Russia's smoky stuffs it calls engines.lol So i'm sure we will help S.Korea make their fighter more powerful/supersonic and one of the most potent fighter jets in Asia and even the world, since the U.S is reluctant to go out of its way to help them, we by contrast are a pragmatic lot, so we will help Seoul. :)

Seoul's KF-X fighter jet mulling European offer - UPI.com

South Korea’s New Fighter Jet: Brought to You by Airbus? | The Diplomat

BAE Systems secures $1bn contract to upgrade South Korean fighter jets | Business | The Guardian

Win-Win.:cheers:
 
.
Well, we are in the process of helping our S.Korean friends with their TF-X fighter program, hopefully we will help them finish this great fighter. We make the best engines in the world(at par with the U.S if not better) not like Russia's smoky stuffs it calls engines.lol So i'm sure we will help S.Korea make their fighter more powerful/supersonic and one of the most potent fighter jets in Asia and even the world, since the U.S is reluctant to go out of its way to help them, we by contrast are a pragmatic lot, so we will help Seoul. :)

Seoul's KF-X fighter jet mulling European offer - UPI.com

South Korea’s New Fighter Jet: Brought to You by Airbus? | The Diplomat

BAE Systems secures $1bn contract to upgrade South Korean fighter jets | Business | The Guardian

Win-Win.:cheers:
I'm sure we offered a variant of the ej-200 to south korea for the kfx. the same engine that the turkish tfx will be powered by
 
.
China Touts Stealth Fighter Jet, But So Far No Takers
Lara Seligman 12:18 p.m. EST November 8, 2015
635825486361340644-DSC01008.JPG

(Photo: Aaron Mehta/Staff)

228 CONNECT 74 TWEET 44 LINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — China showcased its first stealth fighter jet here on the opening day of the Dubai Air Show, but so far the fifth-generation aircraft has no customers in sight.

The Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) is "in negotiations" with the Chinese Air Force to buy the multi-role FC-31, AVIC project manager Lin Peng told reporters on Sunday. Peng declined to say when a deal would be finalized.

Top company officials briefed the media on the stealth characteristics and attack capabilities of the FC-31, but did not take questions from the audience.

This is the first time the Chinese company has showcased the FC-3, also known as the J-31 internationally, although a prototype aircraft flew during the Zhuhai Air Show in China last year. Chinese fighters are designated with a "J" for fighter and "FC" for export.


DEFENSE NEWS

With J-31 Flight, China Makes a Statement

FC-31 would be the first aircraft of its kind available to global customers who face US export restrictions or cannot afford Lockheed Martin's F-35 joint strike fighter. The Chinese company is trying to pitch the FC-31 as a competitor to the JSF, but at this point it is unclear how successful this will be. The customer lineup appears to be Iran and Pakistan.

The FC-31, which closely resembles the F-35, is a medium-sized, low-observable aircraft designed for "the demands of future battlefield environments," Peng told reporters during the briefing.

Officials touted the aircraft's "outstanding situational awareness" achieved with advanced radar, high maneuvering capabilities, and multi-spectrum low-observability. The plane is equipped with twin engines made in China, officials said — not the Russian RD-93 engines previously on the aircraft.

The FC-31 will carry the Small Diameter Bomb, as well as a variety of guided and unguided weapons, officials said.

The test aircraft has been flying for more than two years, Peng told reporters after the briefing. AVIC is planning first flight of the production aircraft in 2019, with initial operational capability scheduled for 2022. The FC-31 will be fully operational in 2024.

US officials and analysts widely believe the FC-31 design was stolen from the F-35 after reports of a major cyber breach of Lockheed's programs by Chinese hackers in April 2009.


DEFENSE NEWS

Industry Fears Massive Losses Through Espionage

Email: lseligman@defensenews.com

Twitter: @laraseligman
 
.
Well, we are in the process of helping our S.Korean friends with their TF-X fighter program, hopefully we will help them finish this great fighter. We make the best engines in the world(at par with the U.S if not better) not like Russia's smoky stuffs it calls engines.lol So i'm sure we will help S.Korea make their fighter more powerful/supersonic and one of the most potent fighter jets in Asia and even the world, since the U.S is reluctant to go out of its way to help them, we by contrast are a pragmatic lot, so we will help Seoul. :)

Seoul's KF-X fighter jet mulling European offer - UPI.com

South Korea’s New Fighter Jet: Brought to You by Airbus? | The Diplomat

BAE Systems secures $1bn contract to upgrade South Korean fighter jets | Business | The Guardian

Win-Win.:cheers:
I doubt UK will help. Helping a competitor to ruin more Typhoon order? Precisely, US reject 4 core technology assist.
 
. . .
No, worst decision ever. Its a plane achieve nothing for PAF. Using western technology that will makes PAF prone to embargo.
to an extent, sort of. the j31 is a good jet, but in term of technological capability i think turkey is better suited as it has access to advanced tech, something which pakistan has a taste for. i know the j31 is almost indigenous except for the engines,yet. this makes it perfect as sanction can't affect its sales. the tfx may be a problem here but i would assume they will make most of the components in-house. similar to that of the t129, its italian origin yet its made completely in turkey, except for a few things.

any progress an the ws-13?

 
.
to an extent, sort of. the j31 is a good jet, but in term of technological capability i think turkey is better suited as it has access to advanced tech, something which pakistan has a taste for. i know the j31 is almost indigenous except for the engines,yet. this makes it perfect as sanction can't affect its sales. the tfx may be a problem here but i would assume they will make most of the components in-house. similar to that of the t129, its italian origin yet its made completely in turkey, except for a few things.

any progress an the ws-13?
China is developing its own high technology and days of rely on access of foreign technology is over. If not how can our huge AEW/AWACS fleet and AESA destroyer are build up? Even when comes to advance airframe technology, we have come together shoulder to shoulder with US. I think you shall have know the largest 3D printing aircraft component are made in China. The newest C919 are also latest proof of China ever improving aviation technology.

WS-13 might make its debut next year. It is entering it final stage of certification and currently tested on a JF-17 pt.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom