What's new

China Top Source of Counterfeit U.S. Military Electronics

Americans, Europeans & Russians who have killed thousands directly or their indirect support having led to thousands killed, have a good impression or image, while China which is making counterfeit products has a bad image.
What a logic.

Taimi, is the topic not about counterfeit products only.. My comments were on topic and were meant for a specific issue.. Please do not put words in my mouth..


I wonder, how come the designs of these counterfeit products reach the Chinese. Definitely someone among the western nations are providing them with these designs and helping the Chinese in making such things.

May be May be not.. but if someone is legally providing designs then why would they call it counterfeit.. It looks more like those designs were illegally copied or stolen..

Chinese have a lot positive image other then Pakistan & N.Korea.

Ok. But even African countries complain about counterfeit products and dangerous medicines being shipped from China by putting labels of other countries. I don't think that in any way gives them a positive image that we are talking about..
 
.
Now these are the reasons, why you are caught. while you sing a song in praise of development, you totally ignore its brutal behavior towards its own people.
:lol: No real chinese would support the brutal genocide of CCP and praise the development @ same time.
there you get caught of being a Chinese, as no neutral person will only talk positive.

Better come out like a brave and show your true color.
could be a :pakistan: in Germany...:oops:
 
.
Götterdämmerung;2955613 said:
To be honest, it's arguably the most ugly city in Brittany.

Are you familiar with Paris?

Quite funny, a false flagger Chinese is testing a ethnic French living in Australia..
 
. .
Götterdämmerung;2957702 said:
Here it comes again. :lol:

Yeah it does.. A sheep hiding in wolf's skin doesn't become a wolf ;)

Anyways, Show me a single comment from yourself which you have said on the topic..
 
.
Yeah it does.. A sheep hiding in wolf's skin doesn't become a wolf ;)

Anyways, Show me a single comment from yourself which you have said on the topic..

I never claimed to be a wolf, must be a projection from your side. :)

We all went off topic long time ago and all of us played along. :cheers:
 
.
Götterdämmerung;2957838 said:
I never claimed to be a wolf, must be a projection from your side. :)

We all went off topic long time ago and all of us played along. :cheers:

u r caught.

Götterdämmerung;2957593 said:
How is the Chinese gov. brutal in comparison to your gov. where millions are dying a slow and painful death caused by hunger and simple diseases? Just make a simple comparison of the social indicators of both countries!

That's what I meant having the cheek to criticise China!

Colored wolf.
 
.
u r caught.

Colored wolf.

It that makes you happy!
sport0020.gif
sport0020.gif
sport0020.gif
 
.
Götterdämmerung;2957460 said:
In case you missed my other post about whether India should scrap democracy where I mentionned Maslow's hierarchy of needs. What you said about freedom is historically as well as scientifically not proven. In fact, all successful domocracies were in their industrialisation phase anything but democratic. Not in Germany, not in France, not in the UK, the USA, Japan, Korea or Taiwan. NONE!

Maslow's hierarchy of needs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May be we are advanced in terms of system of governance. Just because Germany, France, UK or USA were not democracies (I don't know how their system of governance evolved and hence thinking you to be true) while in development phase, doesn't make their evolution superior.

Anyway, China is not rich. Its per capita is 1/10th of an American. China is in the process of bring out millions out of poverty, so is India
 
.
May be we are advanced in terms of system of governance. Just because Germany, France, UK or USA were not democracies (I don't know how their system of governance evolved and hence thinking you to be true) while in development phase, doesn't make their evolution superior.

Anyway, China is not rich. Its per capita is 1/10th of an American. China is in the process of bring out millions out of poverty, so is India

better than 1/50th. The average Chinese has the chance to match a European, but the average European makes more in 1 year than an Indian in an entire lifetime.
 
.
May be we are advanced in terms of system of governance. Just because Germany, France, UK or USA were not democracies (I don't know how their system of governance evolved and hence thinking you to be true) while in development phase, doesn't make their evolution superior.

Anyway, China is not rich. Its per capita is 1/10th of an American. China is in the process of bring out millions out of poverty, so is India

All of the above mentionned democracies evolved differently, their only common trait was that they were not democratic during inudstrialisation and full democracy was established after WWII when illiteracy was eradicated, the median income very high and the economy fully industrialised.

China is not rich, indeed, there are still a few percentage of illiteracy, large parts of western China just started industrialisation and thus to early for democracy.
 
.
Götterdämmerung;2958378 said:
All of the above mentionned democracies evolved differently, their only common trait was that they were not democratic during inudstrialisation and full democracy was established after WWII when illiteracy was eradicated, the median income very high and the economy fully industrialised.

China is not rich, indeed, there are still a few percentage of illiteracy, large parts of western China just started industrialisation and thus to early for democracy.

So you say communism is better for China than democracy at this stage?
 
.
So you say communism is better for China than democracy at this stage?

IMO, yes, authoritarism is better for China at this stage. China is ruled by a communist party only by name. But by the end of the day, it's the Chinese who should decide what kind of democracy or no democracy they choose and evolve into.
 
.
Götterdämmerung;2958424 said:
IMO, yes, authoritarism is better for China at this stage. China is ruled by a communist party only by name. But by the end of the day, it's the Chinese who should decide what kind of democracy or no democracy they choose and evolve into.

So you do not foresee someone like Mao taking over the Chinese Government and coming up with a cultural revolution version II and easily undermine whatever work which has happened till now?
 
.
No, because of your replies/ interest/ aggression towards anything anti china/ Never condemn human right abuse by CCP etc etc etc. the list goes on.

...

Just curious: when was the last time you condemed human rights abuse in India?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom