PERSIAN GOD KING
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Messages
- 4,361
- Reaction score
- 0
Holy **** lol, that is a alot of sats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol nothing is matter with no of launches.....ok its just a propaganda tool..... 1 necessary launch is also good....... just for you information how many sats the china launch in single rocket launch? 3 stats?...... India launched 10 sats in single rocket mission (World record).
in some area India is already is behind and in some area india is ahead and in some area china and india neck to neck.....
Holy **** lol, that is a alot of sats.
This is nothing, the Chinese rocket thrust is weak.
Russians launch 36 rockets in a year. And thrust great.
This is nothing, the Chinese rocket thrust is weak.
Russians launch 36 rockets in a year. And thrust great.
Proton-M: ----------------LangMarch 3B:
mass:712tons--------------mass:425tons
GTO payload: 6000kg-------GTO payload: 5100kg
Soyuz (rocket):-------------LangMarch 2F/G:
mass:300tons---------------mass:464tons
LEO payload:6450kg---------LEO payload: 8400kg
in terms of LEO Rocket payload, China is behind, in terms of GTO Rocket payload, China is slightly weaker than Russian, in terms of rocket engine technology, China is far behind.
Proton-K ------------ LEO payload 19.76 tons
Proton-M ------------ LEO payload 21.60 tons
Long March 3B ---------LEO payload 12 tons
Proton-M Enhanced ---------- GTO payload 6.3 tons
Long March 3B/E ------------- GTO payload 5.5 tons
RD-180 LOX / RP-1 rocket engine ( in service)--------- Thrust (Vacuum) 416 tons
YF-100 LOX / RP-1 rocket engine ( under development) --------- Thrust (Vacuum) 137 tons
in terms of LEO Rocket payload, China is behind, in terms of GTO Rocket payload, China is slightly weaker than Russian, in terms of rocket engine technology, China is far behind.
It is characteristic of Chinese to mass produce something until the quality drops to made-in-china level. It was the case for their tilting apartment condos, lightning high speed raining (pun intended), and satellites will share the same fate.
Russia's cryogenic engine blew up so many times, so much about the reliability.
We are not India, we can build our own cryogenic engine.
And just wait for the CZ5, even this is merely a starting point for us.
LOX/LH2 Cryogenic engine
RD-0120 --------- first flight 1987 ----------- thrust 196 tons
YF-77 ---------- first flight someday in the future ---------- thrust 67 tons
LOX/RP-1 Semi-Cryogenic engine
RD-171 --------- first flight 1987 ----------- thrust 793 tons
YF-100 ---------- first flight 2014 planned ---------- thrust 137 tons
forget about India, India is not in the radar speaking of rocket, why dont we focus on Chinese rocket?
Energia was a failed/scrapped project, since USSR just got bankrupted before it can make it done.
Today's Russian Federation is not equivalent to USSR.
And i doubt YF-100 can be done on schedule, our Yinghuo project just got delayed because of their incompetent management.
We shouldn't cooperate with them on the Mars probe mission in the very beginning, since it wastes so much our precious time.
glad you hear me, look, i got no problem with you saying Russian suck or Russian space programme suck, i know very little about it, so i just dont bother, i got a problem with you saying Russian rocket engine suck, because it is not true base on what i know.
they possess RD-171, RD-180 is the prove.