China to intrude into Bhutan To Connect with Bangladesh?

[idune]

Chicken neck corridor is not a disputed area with China.

But it is disputed area of others, Sikkim was occupied by india through illegal means and rest of chicken neck should not belong to india and need to be redefined and re allocated to rightful owners. That way livelihood of millions of people can be uplifted and potential confrontation point can be removed. Will bring lasting peace and stability for the region. But india offcourse was set up on occupied and disputed colonial land and had been stirring up confrontation since 1947.

 

[RangerPK]

I thought India has defense pact to protect Bhutan? are they going to do something about this Chinese intrusion , As matter of fact Bhutan gradually tilt toward China as Nepal did, eventurally China connect with BD is very feasible India worst nightmare is to see gradually all it's neigbors are on China's side, they're crying like baby now over China-Bhutan's diplomat contact.

Bhutanâ??s road to democracy leads to China? - Times Of India

If the Assam states want to get politically separated from India, if China has influence in Bhutan, then these states can become seperated quite easily with a little intervention by foreign forces.

But I doubt the Chinese would do it, Chinese policy is not to interfere in internal matters of other countries, unlike India...
But if Indian give any real threat to the Chinese, Assam states can become independent before India would even realize it...

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

But it is disputed area of others, Sikkim was occupied by india through illegal means and rest of chicken neck should not belong to india and need to be redefined. That way livelihood of millions of people can be uplifted and potential confrontation point can be removed. lasting peace and stability for the reason. But india offcourse was set up on occupied and disputed colonial land and had been stirring up confrontation since 1947.

China has never formally declare that Sikkim is part of India, we just keep silence until...one day

 

[Aka123]

China has never formally declare that Sikkim is part of India, we just keep silence until...one day

Until.... One day... When you helplessly see that we have liberated tibet completed your sentence.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

If the Assam states want to get politically separated from India, if China has influence in Bhutan, then these states can become seperated quite easily with a little intervention by foreign forces.

But I doubt the Chinese would do it, Chinese policy is not to interfere in internal matters of other countries, unlike India...
But if Indian give any real threat to the Chinese, Assam states can become independent before India would even realize it...

There is another perspecive why China don't want to break Indian's chicken neck, we want to keep India's vunerability of eternity:
If Assam is liberated, we won't have any leverage against India : for now they're so scare that China use water as weapon especially the Brahmaputra river, we're holding them hostage with this geographic handicap that's why solving South Tibet is not a pressing matter.

Zou En Lai and chinese generals were more clever at that time, we chose to liberate Aksai Chin rather than South Tibet: strategically speaking, Aksai Chin not only link Tibet to Xinjiang to provide inter-regional mutual defense support but also allow China to get New Deli closer to our bombarment platform such Long range canons, rocket, airplane and Chose not to liberate South Tibet to keep India's chicken neck expose to China's guillotine in eventual war.

Until.... One day... When you helplessly see that we have liberated tibet completed your sentence.

You can't do a sh1t about liberate Brahmaputra...let alone Tibet.

 

[Aka123]

There is another perspecive why China don't want to break Indian's chicken neck, we want to keep India's vunerability of eternity:
If Assam is liberated, we won't have any leverage against India : for now they're so scare that China use water as weapon especially the Brahmaputra river, we're holding them hostage with this geographic handicap that's why solving South Tibet is not a pressing matter.

Zou En Lai and chinese generals were more clever at that time, we chose to liberate Aksai Chin rather than South Tibet: strategically speaking, Aksai Chin not only link Tibet to Xinjiang to provide inter-regional mutual defense support but also allow China to get New Deli closer to our bombarment platform such Long range canons, rocket, airplane and Chose not to liberate South Tibet to keep India's chicken neck expose to China's guillotine in eventual war.




You can't do a sh1t about liberate Brahmaputra...let alone Tibet.

One word. Loser. That's enough to describe.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

One word. Loser. That's enough to describe.

That's the best you can do? try harder

 

[MST]

connect to Bangladesh? How? I'm only basing on the map above, but it seems, even taking over the whole country, would still be separated by India.

This move makes no sense. Why go into this place. Anybody sure this isn't some sort of misunderstanding or something blown out of proportion?

Every thing is possible in Bangladeshi Wet Dreams. Logic don't apply there.
Wet Dreaming is the most favorite activity in Bangladesh.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Can anyone explain what China's position is on Bhutan, along with its geo-strategic implications?

Also, is India willing to provide any road link with China through the "Chicken-Neck" corridor for the sake of regional economic integration? And why?

Let me try to answer your questions: I think China want to have diplomatic relation with Bhutan as with Nepal and other south Asian countries but India want to keep Bhutan as meatshield against China and open another front in eventual conflit. India sure don't want to lose this advantage but with time Bhutan will realise against China is futile so want to get alone with China for security and economic reasons and this cause a great concern for New deli.

As for the economic integration of SA, India want to be the dominant player in the region, last thing they want is to have China as competitor in this region so they're trying to isolate China as much as possible thu "Chicken-Neck" corridor is just a wet dream. But that's not a dead end, China has recently propose the China-Myanmar-BD corridor.

Don't forget about a few Chinese Donkeys. You can see one wetting pant already here.

Try to come with a decent arguments if you have brain, label Chinese as donkey won't help your cause

 

[RangerPK]

That's the best you can do? try harder

Kina pathetic the trolls have resorted to racism.. I just reported them..

 

[eastwatch]

But it is disputed area of others, Sikkim was occupied by india through illegal means and rest of chicken neck should not belong to india and need to be redefined and re allocated to rightful owners. That way livelihood of millions of people can be uplifted and potential confrontation point can be removed. Will bring lasting peace and stability for the region. But india offcourse was set up on occupied and disputed colonial land and had been stirring up confrontation since 1947.

By reading your post I have the impression that Sikkim should regain its independence and the area surrounding Darjeeling that stretches to Chicken Neck should GO BACK to Nepal.

Yes, it should be like that and the re-arrangement will cease Indian mainland connection with the NE. This will certainly be celebrated by the NE people. This region will automatically gain an independence status.

Oh!!!!! What a great idea?

 

[eastwatch]

China has never formally declare that Sikkim is part of India, we just keep silence until...one day

Are you a real mad? Why are you creating panic among the Indians? They will wet their pants at the thought of such a prospect.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Are you a real mad? Why are you creating panic among the Indians? They will wet their pants at the thought of such a prospect.

here the link of what I said it's true

Sikkim in India-China Relations | Stagecraft and Statecraft

But has Beijing itself made any such statement to date unequivocally recognizing Sikkim as part of India? The answer is no.

 

[GR!FF!N]

@GR!FF!N

Is there any scope for China to infiltrate Bhutan as per this ToI report?

I was skeptical after hearing the words:"According to intelligence reports"on the video.

actually this kind of info is available in public domain..they're just trying to sensationalize the news(as usual)..actually,Sino-Bhutan border clash is not new.and actual aim in this clash is to gain more and more lands in India's "Chicken's Neck" region.Bhutan serves as a buffer region between Indo-China.India barely guards this border,though around it multiple corps are deployed.and it is not an ideal terrain to clash.but if China gets leverage in this region,they'll pose a threat in this vitally important region.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

actually this kind of info is available in public domain..they're just trying to sensationalize the news(as usual)..actually,Sino-Bhutan border clash is not new.and actual aim in this clash is to gain more and more lands in India's "Chicken's Neck" region.Bhutan serves as a buffer region between Indo-China.India barely guards this border,though around it multiple corps are deployed.and it is not an ideal terrain to clash.but if China gets leverage in this region,they'll pose a threat in this vitally important region.

Geograpically speaking,

1-we're in high hill, any canon projectile can fly longer range compare to India on similar weapon.
2-We have New delhi with multi platform range (artillerie, rocket, cruise missile and tactical missle).
3-we have your Chicken neck within our range.
4-Off course water...

I don't know if this consider to be the leverages. But using Bhutan as meatshield for India is just act of cowadice: India knows than in any eventual war, China can flatterned Bhutan anytime without resistance but still using it as a buffer and expect the only victime will be bhutaneses and seen their cities destroyed instead of Indians and Indians cities.