Kiss_of_the_Dragon
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 10,253
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
so,by your logic,when you'll attack India,you'll attack any country within India's influence if needed???your warmongering is simply annoying.why you guys always post about attack this nation and attack that nation???and yes,India protects Bhutan from any external threats.and not from now,but since 1950s.and we'll kepp doing that.as for 1962,you and I know better about the situation.if you try to brag about 1962,I'll drag Chola incident,nathu la incident and other skirmishes and you'll loose your face right there.so,you should post on Sino-Bhutan relation,not about 1962.but yes,you couldn't pulled a war in vietnam in plains.you'll need 1:8 superiority in mountains.and without armors,you know what kind of situation it'll be.defender always get advantage of this kind of situation.
Isn't Bhutan had defense pact with India? If they're allowed Indian army to station in their country either carrying intelligent gathering or any activity against China even without fight, we reserve the right to deal with Bhutan proportionally all depend how critical the situation, in China we have law for equal punishment: punish the thief and punish those who harbor the thielf. If you call that warmonger...so be it.
and sure you can drag and brag about any insignicant battle...who care?
Bhutan had been used as a buffer state by the British taking the Russian and Chinese influence in Tibetan plateau into concern since long.This is a simple and well effective politico military strategy to counter your enemy and calling it a cowardice act is just hilarious.
Your country is a signatory of peace treaty with Bhutan in which both of you agreed to maintain harmony and tranquility across the 470 Km undemarcated border.In stead of signing this agreement your country has shamefully violated this treaty time to time in order to push Bhutan towards your so called package deal..This act does not sound too heroic,my friend.
Claiming some one else's territory,clearly not based on historical or traditional point but just to get hold a strategic upperhand does not sound too heroic. Isn't it?
If you are still in 1962,get a time machine.
As I said earlier, if Bhuthan is used as meatshield by india...than we will put it on the meat slicer...there is not misunderstanding on that. I don't know what you talk about the package deal...but If we have evil intention against Bhutan we could have annexed when we entered Tibet, we didn't need to play a nice guy up until now with Bhutan.
And no I'm not in 1962, but if Indian could invente a time machine for 1979 sino-vietnam war or sino-Japanese war when they lose arguments in the debat, then we Chinese are flattered, we're also capable of making our 1962 time machine...so don't try to predend innocent dude.