What's new

China to buy S-500 missile system from Russia? It was tempting but it will put a hindrance in international law

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
18,063
Reaction score
12
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
After watching the final test of Russia’s S-500 missile system, the Chinese media is praising it. Chinese experts are also strongly advocating to buy this missile system. The great thing is that the S-500, which is considered to be the world’s most advanced defense system, has not yet been commissioned in the Russian army. China already has an older version of this system, the S-400, although its range is less than 300 km due to international law and the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR).

S-500 is being praised in Chinese media
Many defense experts in the Chinese media are praising this advanced missile defense system of Russia. Military expert Lin Sen in thepaper.cn wrote that China’s domestic military industry has recently made great progress in the production of advanced air defenses. Despite this, there is no weapon in China’s arsenal like the S-500 and its integrated air defense capability. In such a situation, China should consider buying it.

Global Times Compares America’s THAAD
At the same time, China’s state media Global Times has also praised the S-500, citing military analysts. Chinese experts have described this missile system of Russia as many times more powerful than America’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD). He believes that this Russian missile system can be of great use against American missiles and fighter planes.

Friendship strengthened between Russia and China
Russia and China have come together very rapidly in the last few years due to rising tensions with the US. Just a few months ago, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov visited Beijing and talked about increasing cooperation with China. Not only this, both the countries had also discussed to make a common strategy against the dollar. Tension is also at its peak in China and America on many issues. This includes issues like Taiwan, South China Sea, Tibet and Uighurs. At the same time, America and Russia have been each other’s johnny enemies since the era of the Cold War.

MTCR to block the sale of S-500
According to Russia, the S-500 missile system has a range of 600 km. Within this distance, this missile system can identify and destroy any enemy target. But due to the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), Russia cannot sell this missile system to China even if it wants to. According to this law, if a country is not a member of the MTCR, then missiles, missiles, drones or bombs with technology beyond 300 km cannot be sold to it. China is not a member of it, while India is.

Russia’s Defense Ministry last month released the first video footage of the S-500 surface-to-air missile system. The Russian Defense Ministry said the video was shot at Kapustin Yar near Astrakhan in southern Russia. During this, the missile of the S-500 air defense system shot down another ballistic missile on its target in the blink of an eye. Initially it will be deployed to monitor air activities around the capital Moscow. Russia has deployed the A-135 anti-ballistic missile system to monitor the skies around Moscow.

navbharat-times.jpg

S-500 has a range of 600 kms
According to Russia’s state media outlet RIA Novosti, the S-500 missile system will have a maximum range of 595 km. The missiles of the S-500 system are packed in fixed silos. The missiles of this system are mounted on a 10 x10 transporter-erector-launcher on the chassis of the BAZ truck. With this, these missiles can be deployed easily and in less time from one place to another. The Voronezh Long Range Early Warning Radar has been installed in the S-500 missile system. This long-range early warning radar is the backbone of this missile defense system.

 
.
Again Russia develops an anti aircraft system that would be better off as ballistic missiles.

I remember Russia saying the S400 couldn't detect American cruise missiles in Syria because of the curvature of the earth, so much for 400km range. Easily defeated by stealth systems low level flight
Any nation that thinks air defense systems would negate aircraft is wrong.
 
.
Again Russia develops an anti aircraft system that would be better off as ballistic missiles.

I remember Russia saying the S400 couldn't detect American cruise missiles in Syria because of the curvature of the earth, so much for 400km range. Easily defeated by stealth systems low level flight
Any nation that thinks air defense systems would negate aircraft is wrong.
Not so fast there buddy. What about the soviet era S-200 that shot down your F-16?
 
.
Not so fast there buddy. What about the soviet era S-200 that shot down your F-16?
One shot down out of literally thousands of strike mission. First Israeli aircraft shot down since the 80s.
And even that was a result of a human error, flying too high above Israel not expecting a missile hitting him over there. Also, 19 S-200 missiles were launched during that mission.

You'd more likely die of a flu shot than get shot down by one Russian missile lol
 
.
What happened to the Chinese HQ19 and HQ29? Aren’t they good enough?
 
.
One shot down out of literally thousands of strike mission. First Israeli aircraft shot down since the 80s.
And even that was a result of a human error, flying too high above Israel not expecting a missile hitting him over there. Also, 19 S-200 missiles were launched during that mission.

You'd more likely die of a flu shot than get shot down by one Russian missile lol
more related to the incompetence and piss poor maintenance by syrians than anything else.
 
.
MTCR isn’t an issue unless you make it one. Russia can sell the system with <300km missiles and China could “make” one that looks exactly like the 600km missile ;)
 
.
more related to the incompetence and piss poor maintenance by syrians than anything else.
No, there isn't much to firing a missile.
You get a radar lock and fire. You're just being naive. What's up with people over this forum being so damn naive?
 
. .
No, there isn't much to firing a missile.
You get a radar lock and fire. You're just being naive. What's up with people over this forum being so damn naive?

You cannt fire missiles at aircrafts that dont enter firing range of air defense, idiot.

The only single downing of Israeli F-16 by Syrian obsolete 60 years old S-200 system is enough to laugh about incompetent and poor quality Israeli Air Force.
 
.
What happened to the Chinese HQ19 and HQ29? Aren’t they good enough?
I don't even know where the info where Chinese expert advocate on buying S-500. Another make up?
 
.
What happened to the Chinese HQ19 and HQ29? Aren’t they good enough?
Different, these are active duty arsenal deployed in large quantities on PLA's grid of C4ISTAR.

Just like the cases of S400 (2 sets) and Su-35 (24 units) before, I believe China will work with Russia as the first user (outside Russia of course) of S500 and get a small quantity of it for training & development right away. Our units under FTTC (Flight Test and Training Centre) say 172 brigade or OPFOR say 175 brigade as "blue teams" are the primary users of non-standard equipment that employs different PLA protocol. Even Pak Airforce had also "battled" against S400 during the 2019 Shaheen VIII, in future Shaheen drills PAF may run against S500 whenever available. The deal should also set a price reference for S500, and financially cover (at least partially) the excellent R&D efforts invested by Russian developer, just like the S400 deal.
 
Last edited:
.
You cannt fire missiles at aircrafts that dont enter firing range of air defense, idiot.

The only single downing of Israeli F-16 by Syrian obsolete 60 years old S-200 system is enough to laugh about incompetent and poor quality Israeli Air Force.
Lol an uneducated Iranian putting words in my mouth, oh well, what can I expect from a fools like you.
 
.
No, there isn't much to firing a missile.
You get a radar lock and fire. You're just being naive. What's up with people over this forum being so damn naive?
lock n fire? I guess all those missile air defence schools around the world put their troops through months and months of playing patty cake.. :lol:

your telling me everyone is naive and your just alright? is it naivity on everyone's part or is it arrogance on your part. answer is very obvious.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom