What's new

China Taiwan Province (ROC): News, Discussions & Images

Yet we took Xisha islands and are still holding them. :rofl:

Vietnamese victory = Losing territory. :P

In glad Vietnamese are so happy about losing territory, it makes it so much easier for us.
No, we dont lose forever it yet, its still a disputed zone and China just got a humiliated lost in the latest conflict :P
 
OT what are they doing different for the national exam?

Here is the new structure of the GaoKao.

English test to exit 'gaokao'

By Li Hongmei

The English test will be removed from China's gaokao (the national college entrance exam) by 2020, according to details of exam and admission reform revealed by the Ministry of Education.

Instead, tests will be held several times a year to allow students to choose when and how often they sit the exam so as to alleviate study pressure and change China's once-in-a-lifetime exam system.

The plan and suggestions for its implementation will be announced in the first half of next year. It will be piloted in selected provinces and cities and promoted nationwide from 2017. A new exam and admission system will be established by 2020, according to the education ministry.

The decision has aroused a heated discussion among both educators and parents who doubted the reform would reduce the burden of learning English or if the substitute test could reflect a student's English skills and help students learn English better.

"The reform shows China is learning from the West to give students more test-taking chances. But more chances might become more of a burden since Chinese students are likely to repeat the test until they get the highest score," said Cai Jigang, a professor at Fudan University's College of Foreign Languages and Literature and chairman of the Shanghai Advisory Committee for College English Teaching at Tertiary Level.

Cai said he was against any plan to reduce the status of English in the college entrance exam because it failed to take into account the nation's demand for foreign language ability, the demand to accept the challenge of globalization and the internationalization of higher education.

Yu Lizhong, chancellor of New York University Shanghai, where classes are in English and students are required to have a high standard of English, said the most important aspect of the reform lay in what to test and how to test.

"As far as I see, the reform doesn't mean English is no longer important for Chinese students after it will be excluded from the unified college entrance exam," Yu said. "In a way, English is even more important than before since the test would only serve as reference, while every college and university, even every major, can have different requirements of a student's English skills under a diverse evaluation system."

Yu said some students will have their study pressure reduced if the major they choose doesn't need excellent English while others still need to study hard if they want to be among the best students.

Yu said he was looking forward to hearing details of the new English test to see how it might alter current English teaching in China from test-oriented to ability-oriented.

Zhang Hui, the mother of a fourth-grade girl, said English was her daughter's strength, so canceling the English test would not favor her child.

"I know I say this quite selfishly, but my daughter's strength will no longer be a distinguished advantage if students can take the test for many times and get equally good scores," Zhang said.

Even so, Zhang said she would continue to let her daughter study English in and out of class because her daughter likes English and she might study overseas in the future.

Educators also said colleges and universities would not lower English thresholds in some majors since the internationalization of China's higher education was imperative. The role of English as an important tool couldn't be overlooked in many other industries in a world environment.

The education ministry said the reform would not affect students attending the college entrance exam over the next three years.
 
are you Hua Qiu ?
Viet or Chinese ethnic, it's not important.

My post's a joke. Just calls Mr Xi a king or a dictator.
毛太祖 (King Mao)
邓太宗 (King Deng)
习圣宗 (King Xi)
 
Viet or Chinese ethnic, it's not important.

My post's a joke. Just calls Mr Xi a king or a dictator.
毛太祖 (King Mao)
邓太宗 (King Deng)
习圣宗 (King Xi)

I suppose you meant "Emperor"?
 
I suppose you meant "Emperor"?
Well, thanks. I think Mr Xi is a king now and he will try to become the Emperor soon. :nhl_checking:
  • A king rules one "country" or "nation"; an emperor rules over many.
  • A king normally rules by birthright; an emperor normally rules by conquest.
 
Viet or Chinese ethnic, it's not important.

My post's a joke. Just calls Mr Xi a king or a dictator.
毛太祖 (King Mao)
邓太宗 (King Deng)
习圣宗 (King Xi)

back ground (ethnicity) of each poster here, true ID is important bro. When you are Hua in native, you could say something what Viet mostly don't agree. Because the interst is different.
 
Taiwan should not miss the boat
By Tim Collard


001ec949c22b1564ef8f0a.jpg

Lin Join-sane (L), chairman of the Taiwan-based Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), shakes hands with Chen Deming, president of the mainland-based Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS), during the signing ceremony of a cross-Strait service trade agreement in Shanghai, east China, June 21, 2013. [Xinhua/Ren Long]

It looked like a hopeful sign for regional economic integration when the Chinese government and the Taiwanese administration signed the Cross-Straits Services Trade Agreement in June of last year. Building on the earlier achievement of the establishment of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement in 2010, the agreement was supposed to remove restrictions on trade in services such as banking, telecommunications and tourism. This in turn could pave the way for a further agreement liberalising cross-Straits trade in goods.

However, the Taiwanese authorities have not yet succeeded in ratifying this agreement. An attempt earlier this year to do so was met by demonstrations and an occupation of the Legislative Yuan, which sufficed to make the authorities back off from full ratification. Attempts are still underway to arrive at a formula for the agreement to be adopted with a parallel monitoring agency to check the implementation of the pact.

There will, however, be a price to pay for Taiwan if the ratification of the agreement is delayed much longer. The liberalization of trade in the Asia-Pacific region is moving inexorably ahead. Many of Taiwan's neighbors are quite serious rivals in the quest to do business with the Chinese mainland – not so much in the field of services, where the common language gives Taiwan a crucial advantage, but in the field of goods. And any delay in completing the service trade agreement will impose an even longer delay on the vital issue of cross-Straits trade in goods.

South Korea is an excellent example of an important trade rival. China is the ROK's largest trading partner, as it is Taiwan's. And the kind of goods in which the Koreans specialize – high-tech machinery as well as metals and petrochemicals – overlap heavily with Taiwan's principal exports. Earlier this year, the leaders of China and the ROK met to give an impulse to progress on a comprehensive free trade agreement, which will provide a complete abolition of tariffs on most South Korean imports. This may be finalized as early as this year. The Taiwanese Ministry of Economic Affairs estimates that this could threaten up to US$49bn of Taiwan's exports. Taiwan has lagged behind some of its regional neighbors in the liberalization of internal trade, which of course filters through to external trade. And the delay in ratifying the key China agreement is slowing down the process of reform, which is necessary for reasons going far beyond the cross-Straits trading relationship.

One of the main factors in regional trade is now the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an initiative which has grown hugely in significance since it was set up in 2005 between four slightly unlikely partners: Chile, Singapore, New Zealand and Brunei. Since then another eight countries have joined the framework negotiations – Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States and Vietnam. Neither the Chinese mainland, nor Taiwan, nor South Korea are as yet involved; but the potential scope and significance of the agreement means that all bilateral negotiations among regional economies are conducted with at least half an eye on the TPP. President Obama has announced that the USA is seriously committed to joining the partnership; this would suggest that it would be highly desirable for China also to be involved, to avoid a geographically lop-sided configuration. And obviously Taiwan's chances of involvement depend on the mainland's cooperation.

But Taiwan's commercial diplomacy is clearly aimed at facilitating entry into the TPP at a later date. In the last year Taiwan has signed free trade agreements with Singapore and New Zealand. These involve relatively small trading volumes – around US$30 billion, less than the amount estimated to be threatened by competition from the ROK – but it is surely no coincidence that those two countries belong to the four pioneers of the TPP. However, South Korea has the advantage there, having already signed a much larger free-trade agreement with the United States on the basis of the emerging requirements of the TPP. And Taiwan still has a long way to go before meeting these requirements in terms of its own trade laws.

It would seem that the implementation of a comprehensive cross-Straits trade agreement, with due attention paid to how the process works in practice, would be an excellent vehicle for both sides of the Straits to further develop the liberalization of their markets, to which both sides are in theory fully committed. There are potentially great gains, not just for the cross-Straits economic relationship but in the sense of integration into the wider economic future of the region. And Taiwan should not risk isolation by failing to implement a pact already agreed in principle and a necessary part of the forward-looking relationship – that would do no good to anybody.

The writer is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/timcollard.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.
 
China is becoming a magnet for well-educated people across Asia as the scale of its economy grows. That's a promising development, which will ultimately lead to the peaceful unification of Taiwan with the motherland.

This also suggests that the anti-services agreement folk do not represent the mainstream Taiwanese.

***

Half of Taiwan's youth willing to work in mainland: survey

TAIPEI, Aug. 30 (Xinhua) -- Half of Taiwanese aged between 18 to 22 said they are willing to find jobs in the Chinese mainland, according to a survey published on Saturday.

The survey, conducted by the United Daily News, found that the island's young people have more willingness to work in the mainland than the older generations.

According to the survey, 46 percent of the 23 to 29-year-olds said they will consider job opportunities in the mainland, compared with 32 percent among the 50-plus age group.


Meanwhile, 53 percent of respondents think investment from the mainland will benefit Taiwan's development, and adults aged below 40 are more positive toward opening up the island's market, results showed.

Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou cited the survey on Saturday during a meeting with the ruling KMT's young members, saying he was happy to see that youngsters are more open-minded and more willing to take challenges than his generation.

 
China should initiate certain quotas for young talents from Taiwan to increase its soft power over the province.

My guess is that, as the old generation who heard the first hand accounts of Japanese colonialism and economic boom that followed die away, the new generation will be more pro-China.

Enough soft power and greater economic and social interaction (which is already massive) will in time bring Taiwan into the warm embrace of the mainland.

China will strike a huge strategic point when it anchors the PLAN vessels on a naval base in Taiwan.
 
The percentage for people from the northern half of Taiwan is much much much higher。:D
 
People will make a chose between the Despotism Bread and the Hungry Democracy, TaiWan's youth also did it.
 
Back
Top Bottom