That's what you say, but it seems that you simply lack the capability to come up with a counter argument.
Not surprising.
Now if your Defense minister had used an Indian language to make this statement, you might have been able to claim a translation error, or some other excuse.
However since India was created by the British, English is a natural link language for them. The result is that these statements are generally made in English, so you can't claim that there was a translation error.
Find me a place where he says "we are" or "we have" and we'll have a debate. Plus, if you're not supporting terrorism, why should you worry? He did say counter terrorism with terrorism, right? Why are you worried if you've done nothing wrong?