What's new

China stalls India's move on Salahuddin: Officials

He is just trying to act good in front of his cheerleaders,as a TT his knowledge on the subject is quite poor

Good observation.

We"ve had 2 Pakistani and 1 Chinese think tanks on this thread so far and not single one of them has given a proper intellectual response on the topic.

I doubt they"ll have any proper response to my above post 44

Better just quote rational Indian members for opinions

Your Defense minister openly says that India is using/sponsoring terrorists, yet you cry when we ask for more evidence before blacklisting someone? :P

Your reading comprehension/ interpretation skills seems to be even worse :P

forget it, he is desperately trying to justify siding with those nutjobs. Must say, nice work pissing off every country surrounding China..

Even more hilarious is he currently is giving negative ratings to my posts from last year, unable to provide proper response to my posts. :lol:

US Exposes 20X Exaggeration in India's IT Exports | Page 2
 
.
You reading comprehension seems to be even worse :P

"You reading comprehension"? :P

Well, that's certainly an interesting sentence.

Again, India's own Defense minister is openly saying that India is using/supporting terrorists (in English no less), yet you guys cry simply because we asked for more evidence before blacklisting someone?

Does that make sense to you?
 
. .
The Chinese TT strikes again!

Indian Admitted, Ok? Sleep now buddy.

Only Pakistan and Pakistanis are taking you seriously on this. :rofl:

Your Defense minister just openly admitted it in front of the whole world, using English no less. :P

‘You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only,’ says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar | The Indian Express

Your senior politicians have to talk in English, otherwise many Indians won't understand it. The downside is you can't claim "translation errors" or misunderstandings.

What he said is perfectly clear.
 
.
"You reading comprehension"? :P

Well, that's certainly an interesting sentence.

Again, India's own Defense minister is openly saying that India is (will) using/supporting terrorists (in English no less), yet you guys cry simply because we asked for more evidence before blacklisting someone?

Does that make sense to you?
There is a big difference between is and will, if you know English.

Ok, even as per your logic you have admitted that you are using terrorism against India. You guys have no shame in using terrorism as a tool and official policy but lecture others if they say they will counter it. Typical chinese cry babies, they get scared the moment one shows mirror.
 
.
Ok, even as per your logic you have admitted that you are using terrorism against India. You guys will have no shame in using terrorism as a tool and official policy but lecture others if they say they will counter it. Typical chinese cry babies, they get scared the moment one shows mirror.

Except we never said that. We are not that dumb. :lol:

Even India itself agrees:

'No evidence of Chinese support to insurgents and Maoists': Indian Home minister - Indian Express

No evidence of China supporting Maoists: Chidambaram - The Times of India
 
.
If China had solved it's land border dispute with all its neighbors except India. India has not resolve any dispute with any of its neighbors, what does that say about the India/China dispute?

The only serious territorial dispute China has resolved is Russia. Add Hong Kong to the list.
China has territorial disputes with Japan, Taiwan, ASEAN states in the South China Sea.

India disputes with Bangladesh are minor. India has resolved disputes with Sri Lanka. India has no issues with Nepal, Bhutan or Burma.
 
.
Your Defense minister just openly admitted it in front of the whole world, using English no less. :P

‘You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only,’ says Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar | The Indian Express

Your senior politicians have to talk in English, otherwise many Indians won't understand it. The downside is you can't claim "translation errors" or misunderstandings.

What he said is perfectly clear.
We do not care what is perfectly clear to a person who does not understand the difference or constructs in English.

Not even for a TT :lol:
 
.
.
what is Pakistan's position on this man Salahuddin?

It seems India is really desperate to indict several Pakistani citizens (not just this one but many others) without the evidence to back it up.

He was masters graduate from university in kashmir, and indian occupiers started enforced disappearances mass rapes and genocide of kashmiris. He fled to azad kashmir where he advocates kashmiris to restore self rule and self determination free from the indian filth. There will never be peace so long as hindu occupiers are killing and maiming elderly, women, children and backlash will always occur, like just yesterday 2 mujahids embraced shahadat and 4 black pigs were dispatched to hell - 4 army men, 2 militants killed in gunfights across Kashmir Valley

indian state terrorism in occupied Kashmir
To-go-with-India-Kashmir--006.jpg

article-2099843-11AE4DD4000005DC-89_468x305.jpg

235EA2C600000578-2844386-image-10_1416588174229.jpg
 
.
Good observation.

We"ve had 2 Pakistani and 1 Chinese think tanks on this thread so far and not single one of them has given a proper intellectual response on the topic.

I doubt they"ll have any proper response to my above post 44

Better just quote rational Indian members for opinions



Your reading comprehension/ interpretation skills seems to be even worse :P



Even more hilarious is he currently is giving negative ratings to my posts from last year, unable to provide proper response to my posts. :lol:

US Exposes 20X Exaggeration in India's IT Exports | Page 2
Plz don't hurt feeling of are esteem TT, he just won't to be alpha dog for his cheerleaders , he is one guy who search for respect in a group of thugs, & will do anything even boot licking to gain one despite knowing deep down in his heart its wrong
 
.
We do not care what is perfectly clear to a person who does not understand the difference or constructs in English.

Not even for a TT :lol:

No matter how much you twist it, you can't change what he said. :P

"You have to neutralise terrorist through terrorist only".

That is what your Defense minister said, and he said it in English.

You can play games with grammar and semantics all day long, but what he said was too straightforward and too plain, to be the subject of petty and trivial arguments over semantics.

It's clear to anyone who reads that sentence, exactly what he means. There is no way to twist it.
 
. .
Except we never said that. We are not that dumb. :lol:
You just proved that chinese and your cheer leaders are really dumb.

The mere action of your protesting admit that you guys are using terrorism, did any other country protest against our minister's statement. Its only the chinese and their cheer leaders have their diapers wet.
 
.
You just proved that chinese and your cheer leaders are really dumb.

The mere action of your protesting admit that you guys are using terrorism, did any other country protest against our minister's statement. Its only the chinese and their cheer leaders have their diapers wet.

We asked for more evidence in the UNSC sanctions committee, and you could not bring any. :P

Then Modi came to China and begged us for a permanent seat at the UNSC:

PM Modi asks China to back India's bid for UNSC seat, NSG membership | DNA India
 
.
Back
Top Bottom