1. Yes, that guy called that Chinese patents, while actually, they are applications sent to some offices ( in China SIPO )
Just read post #5 again, figure A7 "actually" and explicitly says they are "
patent applications for top five offices", China tops in this count.
In the same post, figure A17 "actually" and explicitly says "
patent applications (filed in residence and broad)
for top 20 origins", Applicants from China (837,817) filed the largest number of equivalent patent applications in 2014, followed by the US (509,521) and Japan (465,971). China has been the largest origin of patent applications since
2012 when it overtook Japan. Furthermore, the gap between China and the other origins has increased considerably over the past three years.
Were you blind, or you simply can't read?
2. In China they also count utility model, which is low quality than real patent in total of applications.
When does "quality" comes into play in utility model? Despite the requirements for acquiring a utility model are less stringent than for patents,
the requirement of "novelty" is always to be met. In practice, protection for utility models is often sought for innovations of a rather incremental character which may not meet the patentability criteria. Utility models are considered particularly suited for SME's that make minor improvements to, and adaptations of, existing products. Utility models are primarily used for mechanical innovations.
You don't know that other than China,
many other countries do this? What is your "quality" crap when these countries are doing the same:
Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belize, Brazil, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Chile, China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Malaysia, Mexico, OAPI, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Trinidad & Tobago, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay and Uzbekistan?
3. The massive and rapid growth applications by Chinese residents only happened in China, while not in oversea offices. It reflects the govt incentives policy promotes Chinese enterpreneurs register their IP have some effects.
And too many factories or trading companies submitted what they consider theirs to have some advantages if the quarelling happens.
Bull crap, or show me data to backup your idiotic claims?
What "only happen in China"? Inventors traditionally file at their national offices and then subsequently abroad, China is fast expanding overseas following path of US and Japan:
- China’s applications filed abroad have increased markedly – from around 15,300 in 2010 to 36,700 in 2014
- Share of Chinese applicants at the USPTO increased from 3.2% in 2010 to 6.1% in 2014.
- The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) offers applicants an advantageous route for seeking patent protection internationally as an alternative to using the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property to pursue patent rights in different countries. Together, China and the US accounted for 87% of the total annual growth in PCT filings, which saw some 215,000 applications in total in 2014. The US was the primary country of origin for PCT filers in 2014, with 61,476 applications and 7% growth. Japan followed with 42,380 applications, 3.2% down on 2013. Applicants from China filed 25,548 applications – an 18.7% annual increase.
