What's new

China sent missile vehicles to N. Korea

GR!FF!N

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
8,706
Reaction score
-4
Country
India
Location
India
China shipped missile launch vehicles to North Korea last year in breach of UN resolutions, but was never rebuked because the US did not want to embarrass Beijing, a Japanese newspaper said on Wednesday.


The report, based on Japanese government sources, is the most strident of recent claims that China has been involved in helping to arm its wayward ally after earlier allegations Beijing supplied technology.


Four giant trucks capable of transporting and launching ballistic missiles were exported by a Chinese firm last August, the leading Asahi Shimbun said.


The vehicles were likely those on display at the huge military display in April marking the centenary of the birth of the state’s founder Kim Il Sung, the Asahi said.


The sale of weapons systems to Pyongyang is banned under UN Security Council resolutions aimed at containing the hermit state’s nuclear ambitions.
But at Washington’s urging, Tokyo and Seoul have avoided confronting Beijing in a bid to keep North Korea’s patron onside in the international effort to tamp down tensions on the peninsula, the paper reported.



Top government spokesman Osamu Fujimura declined to confirm the report, saying it was “a matter of intelligence”.


But he added, in general terms “if Japan obtains information about any violation of the UNSC resolution, the government will address the matter in cooperation with concerned nations.”


Japanese government papers reveal four 16-wheel vehicles were transported aboard a Cambodian-registered ship, which was tracked by spy satellites leaving Shanghai on August 1 and arriving at Nampho in western North Korea three days later, the Asahi said.
The vessel then moved on to Osaka where the Japanese coastguard conducted an on-board inspection and discovered documents detailing the export of the vehicles, issued by an agent in Shanghai, the Asahi said.



A report was passed on to the Japanese government’s intelligence office, the Asahi said.

The Asahi said four WS-51200 transport vehicles with a length of 21 metres (about 69 feet) were exported by a subsidiary of the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp., which is affiliated to the Chinese military.
Vehicles of this kind are used in China to transport ballistic missiles and the 16-wheeler 51200 model was likely developed to transport the Dongfeng 31 intercontinental ballistic missile, the report said.



Japan, South Korea and the US agreed the shipment was a violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1974, which bans the export of weapons to North Korea, the paper said.


Washington raised the issue with Beijing in April, the paper reported. Chinese officials acknowledged the export had taken place, but said the vehicles were for civilian purposes, including the transportation of timber.


Two months ago the United States said it believed China’s assurances that it was abiding by sanctions on North Korea after charges that Beijing supplied missile launcher technology.
“China has provided repeated assurances that it’s complying fully with both Resolution 1718 as well as 1874. We’re not presently aware of any UN probe into this matter,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner told reporters.
“I think we take them at their word,” Toner said at the time.


http://www.defence talk/china-shipped-missile-vehicles-to-n-korea-report-43120/

(for viewers,copy the link,paste it in browser and just erase the space between "Defence" and "Talk"...the link will work.text editor is changing the term into stars..sorry for that)... :tup:
 
.
Why the *beep* does China help NK, knowing that it may turn on them, as quickly as Usain Bolt with a golden retriever on his tail??:disagree:
 
. .
Nice source, did you come up with it yourself?

Anyways, I read the story and seen the trucks. Those are heavy lift trucks. If North Korea decides to modify their use, then it's not China's problem. If a knife shop sold a kitchen knife and the buyer stabs somebody with it, do you go after the buyer or the shop?

W020120419336943149253.jpg


Is Japan openly funding terrorists by providing Toyota trucks by the same logic?

toyota_taliban-300x245.jpg

pict24.jpg

Toyota%20wars5.jpg

500x_taliban_11.jpg
 
.
Nice source, did you come up with it yourself?

lolll....its from website "defence talk"(i have to change the name little bit as text editor changes this name into stars)..


and North Korea isn't some independent militia group i guess,who bought weapons as posing civilian... :lol: :lol:
 
.
and North Korea isn't some independent militia group i guess,who bought weapons as posing civilian... :lol: :lol:
The fatal flaw in your argument is that those heavy lift trucks are meant for civilian use, which North Korean chosed to modify into missile platforms. It's the same as Taliban, Somalian and Libyan armed groups modifying Toyota pick up trucks into technicals. By the same token, China should not sell toilet paper to North Korea, since the toilet paper could end up being used by its military.

Sensationalist content not worth a dime.
 
. .
A US maker's diesel engine and a German manufacturer's automatic transmission system may have been used for a missile launch vehicle seen in a military parade in Pyongyang on April 15, raising questions over the efficacy of the international effort to contain and reverse Pyongyang's nuclear weapons threat, Asia Times Online has learned.

Asia Times Online :: US plays a bit part in Pyongyang's parade



The US didn't rebuke China not because she was afraid of embarrass China, rather she too was implicated, directly or indirectly, by supplied the crucial parts for the TELs. The TELs use engines from Cummins Engines and transmissions from Germany.
 
.
A US maker's diesel engine and a German manufacturer's automatic transmission system may have been used for a missile launch vehicle seen in a military parade in Pyongyang on April 15, raising questions over the efficacy of the international effort to contain and reverse Pyongyang's nuclear weapons threat, Asia Times Online has learned.

Asia Times Online :: US plays a bit part in Pyongyang's parade


The US didn't rebuke China not because she was afraid of embarrass China, rather she too was implicated, directly or indirectly, by supplied the crucial parts for the TELs. The TELs use engines from Cummins Engines and transmissions from Germany.

and their paint-brushes from india! india in big trouble!
 
.
The fatal flaw in your argument is that those heavy lift trucks are meant for civilian use, which North Korean chosed to modify into missile platforms. It's the same as Taliban, Somalian and Libyan armed groups modifying Toyota pick up trucks into technicals. By the same token, China should not sell toilet paper to North Korea, since the toilet paper could end up being used by its military.

Sensationalist content not worth a dime.


lol at ignorant Chinese...they can't differentiate between toilet paper and missile carrying transport vessel.no country use a vehicle bought for civilian purpose into military...where is your source that states its bought for civilian purpose???

A US maker's diesel engine and a German manufacturer's automatic transmission system may have been used for a missile launch vehicle seen in a military parade in Pyongyang on April 15, raising questions over the efficacy of the international effort to contain and reverse Pyongyang's nuclear weapons threat, Asia Times Online has learned.

Asia Times Online :: US plays a bit part in Pyongyang's parade



The US didn't rebuke China not because she was afraid of embarrass China, rather she too was implicated, directly or indirectly, by supplied the crucial parts for the TELs. The TELs use engines from Cummins Engines and transmissions from Germany.


lol...did you even opened that link???that stated that in that Chinese vehicle,USA built engine and germany bult transmission is used,but its not USA and Germany sold these vehicle,its China who sold it..its like as Russian built ak-47 was used to kill a person,so jury should prosecute Russia too..hight of delusion.. :lol: :lol:
 
.
lol at ignorant Chinese...they can't differentiate between toilet paper and missile carrying transport vessel.no country use a vehicle bought for civilian purpose into military...where is your source that states its bought for civilian purpose???
Hey dumbass Indian, WS52100 truck is a heavy lift truck for civilian use, designed to move overlength heavy cargo. North Korean bought these trucks and allegedly converted them into mobile missile platforms, which is beyond the reach of China. It is no different than Japan selling Toyota pick up trucks to Afghanistan and Somalia, eventhough these Toyota were used by armed terrorists. If you want to ban everything that might contribute to North Korean military, you might as well not sell any food or toilet paper, since it is for certain these supplies will end up in the hands of KPA first due to military first doctrine.

One more thing retard, we published the open deal in the news in 2010, worth 30 million dollars. It's not like we were hiding anything. It took you two years to notice we sold some truck back in 2010?

201204160943421f6e3.jpg


lol...did you even opened that link???that stated that in that Chinese vehicle,USA built engine and germany bult transmission is used,but its not USA and Germany sold these vehicle,its China who sold it..its like as Russian built ak-47 was used to kill a person,so jury should prosecute Russia too..hight of delusion.. :lol: :lol:
Now let's examine your own logic. China sells a civilian heavy lift truck and North Korea converts it into a missile vehicle, and yet China is at fault? Looks like you went full retard on yourself.

Take your medication on time please.
 
. .
Even if Chinese had violated international law, how you can? Do not just saying no, you should use the action told Chinese Not.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom