What's new

China sends missiles to contested South China Sea island: Fox News

There is no one day. Its now or never. You put SAMs there for a reason. If you ain't using it while planes still flying over your islands, then there is no point. Don't use that well we will do something about it 100 years from now. Or 1 year from now.

If your planes aren't dropping bombs while near our island, then there is no point.
 
.
This is posturing plain & simple. Not even China is stupid enough to shoot a military plane out of the sky.
 
.
This won't ultimately change anything. It's safe to assume the US has been preparing for this for sometime. The US will continue to conduct its patrols.

Yes, so maybe the missiles aren't just for US, Maybe that's why I dont see Vietnamese or Filipino planes flying near our island lol
 
.
This is playing big balls game, China balls growing irony harder. While US dropping it Long B...
 
.
This is posturing plain & simple. Not even China is stupid enough to shoot a military plane out of the sky.
Isn't US posturing a military intimidation against China by flying B52 near those island, China in respond by install anti air missile on those island to let US know, China can't be intimidated by US military posturing in the SCS, Chinese have the capacity to defense those island.
 
.
Combat experience?!, sound cool, but what about combat experience of fighting China, China also have good combat experience of fighting USA, oh, forget your follower:coffee:

after fighting, we will have the combat experience, you think you American are smarter than Chinese in war? you Amercia just have 300 years history, too young, hehe.
Only in China is the PLA the 'victor' against the US. In every serious military academies worldwide, the PLA was considered amateurish and only the sheer manpower China sent to Korea that gave China the avenue to tell the Chinese people that the PLA 'won'. I have personal experience in that. I work with Chinese engineers everyday and to a man, once they saw the Western version of the Korean War, they admitted they do not know as much as the Party allows. Everything about warfare and combat they do not know as much as they thought, from the technical aspects of combat such as troops deployment, artillery, or rifles in the cold, to strategies and political issues that led to the war. To a man, they were surprised that so much technical information are available. A Taiwanese engineer who did his time in the ROCA said that those details would have been classified away in China.
 
Last edited:
.
I see those islands as China's new "Pearl Harbor" base. If not now, but in the future.

It's actually brilliant what our Chinese partners did. Brilliant. She has also now extended AOC for the SSF.
 
. .
Only in China is the PLA the 'victor' against the US. In every serious military academies worldwide, the PLA was considered amateurish and only the sheer manpower China sent to Korea that gave China the avenue to tell the Chinese people that the PLA 'won'. I have personal experience in that. I work with Chinese engineers everyday and to a man, once they saw the Western version of the Korean War, they admitted they do not know as much as the Party allows. Everything about warfare and combat they do not know as much as they thought, from the technical aspects of combat such as troops deployment, artillery, or rifles in the cold, to strategies and political issues that led to the war. To a man, they were surprised that so much technical information are available. A Taiwanese engineer who did his time in the ROCA said that those details would have been classified away in China.
For normal Chinese, of course, we can't know every detail of Korea war, we are poor country, not like you, and you are open, for normal Chinese, it is in these years, we are much easier availabe to such huge information, you think we are not free, it is doesn't matter, the contact between you and US is not too long, you think we don't know your western version, do you really know we version?

As to Korean war, whether we won or not, depend on how do you define it, can say won, of coure, draw for Chinese, but absolutely not lose, it is doesn't matter, we sacrifice too much, but it is worthful, with much poorer equipment than you US, we can get this, that encough, you also lost too much, isn't it?!

China is strong, but compared with US, we know not encough, can protect ourself it encough, we are not world police, can't and no need like US now, you think PLA are amateurish, nothing, PLA's main duty is protect Chinese in China, you US army can be "professional" in the worldwide, that's because you strong economy and science, not because you Army are better than PLA, If we have strong economy and science, can provide encough equipment to PLA, it is too early to make conclusion that who is amateurish?! :coffee:

Maybe offend you, in fact, after seeing your army show in the world, I think you are just so-so, not outstanding, bullying some middle and small country is ok, but......, hehe.

LMAO, we can shoot down cheap J-20 just by Mig 17 if it dare to join the real air combat . Dont show Vnese your scrap here.:laugh:

Sub Mekong would be unified in 1979 if CN didnt bow down and beg for support from US-JP to stop VN till 1988.
Hehe, good talk, but what this can do?:-)

Mind you tell me what China had beg from US-JP?:-),

Seems, for you that China can invade you Vietnam is because we beg for support from US-JP, so now you beg for support from US-JP to stop China?
 
Last edited:
.
There is no one day. Its now or never. You put SAMs there for a reason. If you ain't using it while planes still flying over your islands, then there is no point. Don't use that well we will do something about it 100 years from now. Or 1 year from now.
Uncle Sam deploys many soldiers and weapon around korea .
Why do not you just use your army to kill fat Kim ?
 
.
Uncle Sam deploys many soldiers and weapon around korea .
Why do not you just use your army to kill fat Kim ?
If China promised -- on paper -- to stay out of Korea and let whatever consequences be, we will.
 
.
You mean the actual combat experience gap ? :lol:

lol you funny,

SEAD.JPG
 
. .
Only in China is the PLA the 'victor' against the US. In every serious military academies worldwide, the PLA was considered amateurish and only the sheer manpower China sent to Korea that gave China the avenue to tell the Chinese people that the PLA 'won'. I have personal experience in that. I work with Chinese engineers everyday and to a man, once they saw the Western version of the Korean War, they admitted they do not know as much as the Party allows. Everything about warfare and combat they do not know as much as they thought, from the technical aspects of combat such as troops deployment, artillery, or rifles in the cold, to strategies and political issues that led to the war. To a man, they were surprised that so much technical information are available. A Taiwanese engineer who did his time in the ROCA said that those details would have been classified away in China.

You care to explain why US never declared victory over the Korean war? show me some backup in US textbooks?
When USA joined the war, SK was pushed back to PUSAN,
When China joined the war, the allies were at Yalu River.
The war ended at 38th.
Neither side was willing to sacrifice more for a unified Communist/Democratic Korea.
Both sides achieved their objective.
koreanwar-fourmaps1200.jpg
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom